Advances in large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s GPT and related techniques involving machine learning algorithms resulted in the generative AI (gen AI) boom of recent years, and further advancements have led to the emerging field of autonomous agents.
By integrating tools, APIs, hardware interfaces and other external resources, agentic AI systems are increasingly autonomous, capable of real-time decision-making and adept at problem-solving across various use cases.
Complex agents can’t act without making a decision, and they can’t make good decisions without first making a plan. Agentic planning consists of several key components that work together to encourage optimal decision-making.
Goal definition
The first and most critical step in AI planning is defining a clear objective. The goal serves as the guiding principle for the agent’s decision-making process, determining the end state it seeks to achieve. Goals can either be static, remaining unchanged throughout the planning process, or dynamic, adjusting based on environmental conditions or user interactions.
For instance, a self-driving car might have a goal of reaching a specific destination efficiently while adhering to safety regulations. Without a well-defined goal, an agent would lack direction, leading to erratic or inefficient behavior.
If the goal is complex, agentic AI models will break it down into smaller, more manageable sub-goals in a process called task decomposition. This allows the system to focus on complex tasks in a hierarchical manner.
LLMs play a vital role in task decomposition, breaking down a high-level goal into smaller subtasks and then executing those subtasks through various steps. For instance, a user might ask a chatbot with a natural language prompt to plan a trip.
The agent would first decompose the task into components such as booking flights, finding hotels and planning an itinerary. Once decomposed, the agent can use application programming interfaces (APIs) to fetch real-time data, check pricing and even suggest destinations.
State representation
To plan effectively, an agent must have a structured understanding of its environment. This understanding is achieved through state representation, which models the current conditions, constraints and contextual factors that influence decision-making.
Agents have some built-in knowledge from their training data or datasets representing previous interactions, but perception is required for agents to have a real-time understanding of their environment. Agents collect data through sensory input, allowing it to model its environment, along with user input and data describing its own internal state.
The complexity of state representation varies depending on the task. For example, in a chess game, the state includes the position of all pieces on the board, while in a robotic navigation system, the state might involve spatial coordinates, obstacles and terrain conditions.
The accuracy of state representation directly impacts an agent’s ability to make informed decisions, as it determines how well the agent can predict the outcomes of its actions.
Action sequencing
Once the agent has established its goal and assessed its environment, it must determine a sequence of actions that will transition it from its current state to the desired goal state. This process, known as action sequencing, involves structuring a logical and efficient set of steps that the agent must follow.
The agent needs to identify potential actions, reduce that list to optimal actions, prioritize them and identifying dependencies between actions and conditional steps based on potential changes in the environment. The agent might allocate resources to each step in the sequence, or schedule actions based on environmental constraints.
For example, a robotic vacuum cleaner needs to decide the most effective path to clean a room, ensuring it covers all necessary areas without unnecessary repetition. If the sequence of actions is not well planned, the AI agent might take inefficient or redundant steps, leading to wasted resources and increased execution time.
The ReAct framework is a methodology used in AI for handling dynamic decision-making. In the ReAct framework, reasoning refers to the cognitive process where the agent determines what actions or strategies are required to achieve a specific goal.
This phase is similar to the planning phase in agentic AI, where the agent generates a sequence of steps to solve a problem or fulfill a task. Other emerging frameworks include ReWOO, RAISE and Reflexion, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses.
Optimization and evaluation
AI planning often involves selecting the most optimal path to achieving a goal, especially when multiple options are available. Optimization helps ensure that an agent's chosen sequence of actions is the most efficient, cost-effective or otherwise beneficial given the circumstances. This process often requires evaluating different factors such as time, resource consumption, risks and potential rewards.
For example, a warehouse robot tasked with retrieving items must determine the shortest and safest route to avoid collisions and reduce operational time. Without proper optimization, AI agents might execute plans that are functional but suboptimal, leading to inefficiencies. Several methods can be used to optimize decision-making, including:
Heuristic search
Heuristic search algorithms help agents find optimal solutions by estimating the best path toward a goal. These algorithms rely on heuristic functions—mathematical estimates of how close a given state is to the desired goal. Heuristic searches are particularly effective for structured environments where agents need to find optimal paths quickly.
Reinforcement learning
Reinforcement learning enables agents to optimize planning through trial and error, learning which sequences of actions lead to the best outcomes over time. An agent interacts with an environment, receives feedback in the form of rewards or penalties, and refines its strategies accordingly.
Probabilistic planning
In real-world scenarios, AI agents often operate in uncertain environments where outcomes are not deterministic. Probabilistic planning methods account for uncertainty by evaluating multiple possible outcomes and selecting actions with the highest expected utility.
Collaboration
Single agent planning is one thing, but in a multiagent system, AI agents must work autonomously while interacting with each other to achieve individual or collective goals.
The planning process for AI agents in a multiagent system is more complex than for a single agent because agents must not only plan their own actions but also consider the actions of other agents and how their decisions interact with those of others.
Depending on the agentic architecture, each agent in the system typically has its own individual goals, which might involve accomplishing specific tasks or maximizing a reward function. In many multiagent systems, agents need to work together to achieve shared goals.
These goals could be defined by an overarching system or emerge from the agents’ interactions. Agents need mechanisms to communicate and align their goals, especially in cooperative scenarios. This could be done through explicit messaging, shared task definitions or implicit coordination.
Planning in multiagent systems can be centralized, where a single entity or controller—likely an LLM agent—generates the plan for the entire system.
Each agent receives instructions or plans from this central authority. It can also be decentralized, where agents generate their own plans but work collaboratively to help ensure that they align with each other and contribute to global objectives, often requiring communication and negotiation.
This collaborative decision-making process enhances efficiency, reduces biases in task execution, helps to avoid hallucinations through cross-validation and consensus-building and encourages the agents to work toward a common goal.