These practices must address all of the stack layers, including the containerization platform, container images, orchestration platform and individual containers and applications.
First and foremost, container security policies must revolve around a zero trust framework. This model verifies and authorizes every user connection and ensures that the interaction meets the conditional requirements of the organization’s security policies. A zero-trust security strategy also authenticates and authorizes every device, network flow and connection based on dynamic policies, by using context from as many data sources as possible.
Container security has become a more significant concern as more organizations have come to rely on containerization technology, including orchestration platforms, to deploy and scale their applications. According to a report from Red Hat6, vulnerabilities and misconfigurations are top security concerns with container and Kubernetes environments.
As previously mentioned, containerized applications inherently have a level of security since they can run as isolated processes and operate independently of other containers. Truly isolated, this might prevent any malicious code from affecting other containers or invading the host system. However, application layers within a container are often shared across containers. Regarding resource efficiency, this is a plus, but it also opens the door to interference and security breaches across containers. The same might be said of the shared operating system since multiple containers can be associated with the same host operating system. Security threats to the common operating system can impact all associated containers; conversely, a container breach can potentially invade the host operating system.
But what about the risks and vulnerabilities associated with the container image itself? A robust containerization strategy includes a “secure-by-default” approach, meaning that security should be inherent in the platform and not a separately deployed and configured solution. To this end, the container engine supports all the default isolation properties inherent in the underlying operating system. Security permissions can be defined to automatically block unwanted components from entering containers or to limit communications with unnecessary resources.
For example, Linux Namespaces helps to provide an isolated view of the system to each container; this includes networking, mount points, process IDs, user IDs, inter-process communication and hostname settings. Namespaces can limit access to any of those resources through processes within each container. Typically, subsystems that do not have Namespace support are not accessible from within a container. Administrators can easily create and manage these “isolation constraints” on each containerized application through a simple user interface.
Additionally, a wide range of container security solutions are available to automate threat detection and response across an enterprise. These tools help monitor and enforce security policies and meet industry standards to ensure the secure flow of data. For instance, security management software tools can help automate CI/CD pipelines, block vulnerabilities before production and investigate suspicious activity with real-time visibility. This approach falls under DevSecOps, the application and development process that automates the integration of security practices at every level of the software development lifecycle.