Bare metal vs. virtual machine cloud: Which option is right for me?

Share this post:

There is no doubt that cloud brings us an entire new set of value propositions for enterprise computing environments, offering a huge set of benefits like application scalability, operational flexibility, improved economies of scale, reduced costs, resource efficiencies, agility improvement and more. It is harder to find all these benefits when considering just the traditional computing model.

Managed-Hosting-as-a-Service-MHaaSGenerally speaking, organizations today can choose between two types of clouds. Traditional clouds offer virtual machines (VMs) that are extremely easy to use but abstract disk, memory and CPU and come with a performance penalty. Bare metal clouds are essentially physical servers that can be deployed on demand and billed hourly.

When I first heard about bare metal in a cloud context, all of a sudden a question came up in my mind: From a conceptual perspective, does a cloud configuration require some kind of virtualization?


(Related: Three key advantages of using SoftLayer for cloud deployment)

In fact, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), whose cloud definition is widely accepted in the industry, omits virtualization as a criterion for cloud. The essential characteristics mentioned by NIST include on-demand self-service, broad network access, resource pooling, rapid elasticity and measured service, but not virtualization. This may surprise many in the IT community (like me!) who have always assumed that a virtualized server infrastructure was necessary to provide the flexibility and scalability associated with cloud.

With that said, you can see that VMs are great for some things and bare-metal servers are great for other things. Sometimes those reasons are technology and sometimes those reasons are based in finance issues.

You should consider VM cloud for highly dynamic workloads where you’re not really worried about performance. For example, if you have an application that spins up and down rapidly, or if you have very temporary workloads that must be spun up in minutes and run for a short period of time before you turn them off, virtualization is great.

But if your application is sensitive to performance, bare metal can be unbeatable. Bare metal cloud services refer to a type of high-performance, hosted-server offering that combines the advantages of traditional dedicated servers with those of infrastructure as a service (IaaS) virtual servers.

With bare metal cloud, all of the resources of physical servers are dedicated to a single user and can offer better performance than a comparable virtualized server. Because resources are not being shared, no hypervisor layer is needed, allowing more of the server’s processing power to be allocated to the application.

Some of the advantages of bare metal cloud services are:

• Resources dedicated to a single customer
• Greater processing power and input/output operations per second (IOPS)
• More consistent disk and network I/O performance
• Quality of Service (QoS) that guarantees elimination of the noisy neighbor problem in a multitenant environment.

Another benefit from bare metal is security. The potential of breaking regulatory compliance in a multitenant environment was the main reason why security-sensitive organizations were originally reluctant to move their data to the cloud. With bare-metal servers, it is possible to implement physical segregation of resources.

Another important issue addressed by bare metal is that there are some software vendors with license and support agreements that don’t support sub-capacity license models. In this case, the vendor does not allow the use of soft partitioning as a means to determine or limit the number of software licenses required for any given server.

You will have to pay for the software license as if you are using the entire physical server, even if you are not.

There are just a few cloud providers that offer a real bare-metal cloud computing instance in their cloud service portfolio. SoftLayer, an IBM company is leading the way in this type of offering by giving its clients the opportunity to enjoy the flexibility, provisioning and on-demand billing advantages of cloud computing and running applications on dedicated physical servers at same time.

In addition, SoftLayer customers can move data with the click of a button from virtual servers to physical and back, whenever they choose, in the SoftLayer data centers.

As you can see, there is not a correct answer for the question in the title of the post. It will always depend on the type of workload you need to run on top of the cloud.

I would like to hear from you. Which cloud would you choose and why?

More Infrastructure stories

Solving the productivity crisis: Digital process automation for deep deployments

The way we do work today isn’t working for many employees and employers. Employers have fewer qualified people to perform complex tasks, while employees get bogged down with low-value tasks. What slowly emerges is a productivity crisis. How can companies solve it? Automation is one of the go-to solutions, but automation fixes are still segmented, focusing on […]

Continue reading

How to start scaling automation projects with design thinking

Digital business automation is helping companies across industries improve operational efficiency, drive innovation and better serve customers. Automating work helps businesses offer a better experience at speed and scale. To begin, businesses must evaluate their big picture. What are the complex processes with multiple steps that when done manually are slow, costly and frustrating for […]

Continue reading

5 keys to overcoming cloud migration challenges

Cloud migration challenges continue to bedevil enterprises, despite the fact that the cloud itself has been around for nearly 20 years. Many enterprises have yet to realize the full promise of an abstract, distributed, federated data environment because migrations are still often so difficult. Nobody embarks upon a cloud migration expecting to fail, of course. […]

Continue reading