Native integration (sometimes called in-house integration or point-to-point integration) refers to built-in methods for connecting applications that enable data exchange without the need for external connectors (or integrations), such as third-party software or middleware.
Native integrations are typically built and maintained by a software provider’s engineers and often use application programming interfaces (APIs) to connect platforms. The term “native,” in its most technically correct usage, refers to integrations between applications made by the same organization, such as an integration between Google Meet and Google Calendar. In practice, “native integration” is also commonly used to refer to integrations which are provided by one of the platforms involved in an integration.
Many platforms, including those offered by Salesforce, Google, Microsoft and Shopify, provide their own marketplaces featuring many optimized integrations which are colloquially called “native.” An integration between Zoom and Google Calendar provides a native-like user experience: the integration is found on Google’s Workspace Marketplace and is subject to a review process by Google that regulates use of user data, misleading or offensive content, scams and other potentially objectionable elements.
Native integrations of this sort are designed to be as seamless as possible, available within an application’s standard interface. They are, in a sense, out-of-the-box solutions to connect two applications.
When possible, organizations often opt for native integrations over custom or third-party integrations because native integrations often present less friction than third-party solutions, and they help organizations avoid the increased time, money and labor involved in creating and maintaining custom integrations.
Native integrations are designed to provide the most commonly used features for the most users. Inevitably, they are insufficient for some use cases. For example, unsupported legacy software or small custom-built applications might be too niche to garner a native integration on a platform’s marketplace.
Native integrations might also not offer sufficient control for certain use cases. Organizations might require more complex “if/then” interactions, integrations among several different applications in a coordinated workflow, more granular control over data flow, or more specific compliance features than native integrations can offer. In such cases, organizations might opt for other integration solutions, such as unified APIs, or iPaaS or embedded iPaaS platforms that enable greater customization and streamline the integration of many applications and systems.
Sometimes the term “API” is used to differentiate third-party integrations from native, built-in integrations. This is misleading, as native integrations often use APIs (commonly REST APIs) to facilitate data exchange. Native integration is simply an approach to building integrations.
The difference isn’t in API integration or non-API integration; it’s in whether the integration is built and maintained by the application vendor or by a third-party. In the Zoom and Google example, the native integration would be built and maintained by engineers from Zoom or Google. If that native integration didn’t exist, a third-party company might need to build and market that integration to enable integration of the two products and their respective features.
Native integrations can be used to save time, reduce error potential and streamline processes. Each organization has individual integration needs, but there are many common native integration constructions.
Many IT departments and development teams use dedicated issue management platforms, such as Jira or Asana, to keep track of request tickets, progress and collaborations throughout an issue’s lifecycle. These platforms have native integrations to help with the process of resolving tickets: requests can be linked to employee identity automatically, can send emails with updates and can sync with documentation or collaboration tools.
Chat applications such as Slack offer many seamless integrations with other commonly used applications and platforms. A workspace administrator can visit a chat app’s marketplace to install a variety of integrations, as well as controlling some basic permissions and settings.
For example, project management tools such as Jira can integrate with Slack to allow users to create tickets, check ticket status, receive notifications in specified channels and more. Calendar applications such as Outlook and Google Calendar can sync with Slack to automatically change a user’s Slack status to “in a meeting” in concert with calendar appointments. Video chat applications can be launched with a simple slash command.
Customer relationship management, or CRM, platforms help businesses centralize and manage customer data. CRM tools are used to store customer data, customer support interaction records, sales and billing information, contracts and more. CRM platforms often feature native integrations that facilitate the creation of customer-related workflows.
CRM platforms can integrate with social media networks, noting interactions and engagement that indicate sales lead potential. Ecommerce platforms can automatically add order and customer information to CRM platforms. Email marketing services can use customer data in a CRM platform to send more efficient, targeted emails. Payment processors can have payments listed automatically in a CRM’s sales data flow, all in real-time.
Stay up to date on the most important—and intriguing—industry trends on AI, automation, data and beyond with the Think newsletter. See the IBM Privacy Statement.
There are other integration methods beyond native and third-party APIs. Unified API and iPaaS platforms, for example, are designed to add flexibility, scalability and power to integrations.
Unified APIs are single, standardized interfaces used to access the APIs of multiple third-party applications within a particular vertical (such as accounting, CRM or payroll). A unified API enables developers to communicate with multiple services through one endpoint, rather than integrating with each individual service and dealing with data, syntax and authentication differences among them.
One use case for a unified API integration is in the case of a large corporation in which different departments, due to mergers or specific feature or localization needs, uses different CRM platforms. A unified API can build integrations to normalize, streamline and consolidate data from multiple different CRM platforms to provide a superior experience.
Integration platform as a service (iPaaS) is a cloud-based platform with integration tools and solutions used to integrate data from multiple SaaS applications, legacy systems, databases, IoT devices and APIs hosted in different IT environments.
iPaaS platforms typically contain cloud-based libraries of pre-built connectors for different apps and services, low-code and no-code development tools for integration development and other capabilities to facilitate secure, scalable integration. iPaaS is an extension of the concept of a native integration, designed to address the reality that modern organizations often have many applications that need to be organized in workflows and data that needs to be shared and synced among them.
Their main function is to help organizations overcome integration complexity and reduce integration costs across hybrid environments, by ensuring compatible formatting, orchestrating multi-step workflows, automating data flows, handling API management and more. iPaaS is also specifically designed as a hybrid integration environment, meaning it connects applications both on-premises and in the cloud, while providing a cloud-based platform for management of those connections. That capability makes iPaaS an enticing integration method for organizations with extensive legacy systems.
Embedded integration platform as a service (EiPaaS) is a cloud-based integration solution that enables software providers to embed integration capabilities directly into their applications. In contrast with traditional iPaaS, which is used primarily by internal teams for internal use, EiPaaS is external-facing. EiPaaS is designed for customers of software applications to set up and manage their own integrations without ever leaving that host platform.
EiPaaS tools are typically streamlined to enable a variety of integrations without the need for extensive technical know-how. EiPaaS tools can be thought of as pre-packaged infrastructure that enables easier integrations for organizations that don’t need or don’t want to build their own iPaaS platform. For SaaS companies that host EiPaaS tools, they can keep customers on their own platform rather than sending them to an iPaaS provider, and can often offer EiPaaS tools at a lower cost for consumers than they’d have with a separate iPaaS platform.
According to Zylo, enterprises managed an average of 275 SaaS applications in 2025. Integration can be a challenge, and major SaaS platforms such as Salesforce, Shopify and Microsoft offer thousands of integrations. Such integrations can provide several benefits, including:
Organizations can turn integrations on with simple configuration instead of building and maintaining custom connectors, so teams start using connected workflows in hours or days instead of weeks.
Native integrations reduce labor and development costs for the client organization. Setup is typically simple, and internal teams generally have few requirements to manage.
Many native integrations are free—they’re simply included features. Others might require a premium subscription or have per-user charges, but they’re often less expensive than building your own integration or purchasing a separate integration platform.
The vendor, not the client organization or end user, bears the responsibility for maintaining, updating and monitoring a native integration. This means that the client does not have to worry about performance and functionality in the face of updates and other changes.
Native integrations can offer better performance and reliability than many third-party options. Because the same vendor designs and maintains both the app and the integration, users typically get more stable behavior, sensible defaults for retries/throttling, and fewer breaking changes.
Native integrations can be more secure than third-party integrations. One reason for this is the lack of a middleman. Companies constructing a native integration between their services, or between their service and another application, often use their own APIs and security mechanisms, which are specifically designed to work with their systems and requirements.
For example, Microsoft adds enterprise-grade security layers on top of standard OAuth and OpenID Connect features to strengthen security for its Azure environments.1
While native integrations are commonly used, so too are third-party integrations. There are reasons why organizations might stray from built-in integrations, including:
With native integrations, typically clients must accept what the vendor provides. Users with more specific needs might find that their use cases are not covered.
For example, a native integration might not allow custom data fields or the ability to insert complex logic beyond simple settings. This can make it hard to support nuanced workflows like multi-step processes.
Scalability can also be an issue; custom integrations won’t have the obstacle of per-user costs, so while native integrations might be less expensive up front, they might be more expensive in the long term.
At high data volumes, native integrations can struggle with throughput limits, timeouts, or API rate constraints that the vendor hasn’t optimized for enterprise scale. And native connectors typically cover only a subset of popular apps and scenarios. As a tech stack grows, gaps might emerge, leaving an organization with partial connectivity or data silos.
Clients have little, if any, control over macro changes in native integrations. If a client organization builds workflows around native integrations, any changes in integration capability or availability can disrupt operations. Integrations can be discontinued, or protocols might change in ways that break compatibility with client workflows and systems.
Enable dynamic, scalable integration that adapts to evolving business needs. AI-powered, API-driven automation
Unlock business potential with IBM integration solutions, which connect applications and systems to access critical data quickly and securely.
Harness hybrid cloud to its fullest value in the era of agentic AI
1 “Microsoft identity platform app types and authentication flows,” Microsoft.com, 14 April 2025