Asset performance management (APM) is a strategic approach to managing company assets used in daily business operations. Enterprises rely on APM to optimize the performance of their most valuable assets, including buildings, equipment, vehicles, software and technology.
Top-performing APM solutions combine software and asset management best practices to increase the performance and reliability of everything from a smart office building to a fleet of transport vehicles.
Using advanced capabilities such as predictive maintenance, AI-enhanced analytics and remote monitoring, APM solutions reduce equipment failures, improve asset reliability and extend asset lifespans while avoiding extra operational costs for organizations.
An asset is any piece of property that is (or can be) useful or valuable to an organization. The term can include both physical and non-physical assets, such as infrastructure and equipment, capital resources and intellectual property (IP).
Although talented employees contribute significant value to an organization, personnel are not assets in the technical sense. Human beings cannot be owned or controlled in the same way a business might operate a warehouse or hold voting shares in an investment property.
In essence, assets are valuable property used for business purposes. Generally, assets are divided into four major categories:
Stay up to date on the most important—and intriguing—industry trends on AI, automation, data and beyond with the Think Newsletter, delivered twice weekly. See the IBM Privacy Statement.
Across industries, organizations use asset performance management (APM) as part of their overall asset strategy to reduce asset failures, decrease unplanned downtime and minimize maintenance costs. Modern APM solutions also generally improve compliance capabilities, equipment diagnostics capabilities, asset connectivity and maintenance ecosystems.
Broadly, the benefits of effective APM include the following capabilities:
Enabled by a range of modern hardware and software solutions, asset performance management (APM) programs use a layered stack of technologies to collect, analyze and respond to asset data.
These APM capabilities are the key components of the APM technology stack.
Internet of Things (IoT) technology allows organizations to create connected networks of smart sensors for real-time asset monitoring.
Vibration sensors and condition monitoring tools track equipment endurance and physical stress to flag early signs of wear. Computer vision‑enabled visual inspection technologies use video and photography to identify defects that human inspectors might overlook.
SCADA systems collate data from sensors across the entire production facility.
When the data is collected, SCADA solutions provide centralized visibility and control for equipment operators and management and serve as a primary data source for APM software.
APM technologies use artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to detect performance anomalies, enabling organizations to predict and prevent unexpected equipment failures and downtime.
Predictive analytics support condition-based and prescriptive maintenance, often incorporating generative AI tools to create high-level summaries to quickly draft reports and work orders on-demand.
At the level of the APM stack, automation and management tools such as enterprise asset management (EAM) solutions and computerized maintenance management systems (CMMS) ingest and centralize information from the lower layers.
Depending on operational requirements, EAM and CMMS solutions will also automate recommended maintenance tasks and incorporate digital twin virtualized models for simulating asset performance and predicting operational outcomes.
Today’s top-performing asset performance management (APM) solutions use software, tools and a data-driven approach to help organizations achieve their digital transformation initiatives. APM software solutions help business leaders construct a unified strategy, increase their risk management capabilities and deliver operational excellence.
Here are three steps to building an effective APM program inside your organization.
Effective APM begins in the first stage of the asset lifecycle: planning. Before an asset is even acquired, decision-makers need to think about how operating and maintaining it fits into their broader operations. To do this assessment, they need to assess the asset’s value.
Asset valuation varies greatly between organizations and industries. For example, in a food delivery business, the health and performance of vehicles used to transport goods is going to be critical. However, for a software company, even if it owns a fleet of vehicles used occasionally, the health and performance of those vehicles are not critical to its daily business operations. Therefore, these two organizations would value the same asset differently.
When you’re starting to form your APM strategy, choose assets that are critical to business operations first. You can address the condition of your lower priority assets later.
One technique that has become increasingly valuable in APM is the creation of a digital twin. A digital twin is a virtual representation of an asset that allows operators to run tests and predict performance based on simulations. With a good digital twin, decision-makers can know how well an asset is likely to perform under the conditions they plan to subject it to.
Digital twins help operators and maintenance leaders spot performance issues and gain insights into possible improvements to maintenance plans.
When monitoring asset performance and the automation of critical asset workflows, APM software, such as an enterprise asset management (EAM) system, is crucial. EAM combines software and services to help organizations maintain, control and optimize their operational assets.
With the amount of data being generated these days through the Internet of Things (IoT), maintenance managers increasingly rely on management software such as EAM equipped with AI‑enhanced data analysis. This software helps them make smarter decisions.
In addition to EAM, many APM initiatives deploy a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) to help maintenance departments centralize vital asset information. A CMMS tells maintenance managers where an asset is, what kind of services or repairs it requires and who should perform them. A strong CMMS can make critical information about an asset immediately accessible and auditable to its operators.
Modern APM approaches rely on preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance.
Preventive maintenance uses regularly scheduled maintenance activities to reduce the chances of assets breaking down. Downtime is planned by using best practices and historical averages, such as mean time between failure (MTBF).
Predictive maintenance continuously assesses and reassesses an asset’s condition by using sensors that collect data about the asset in real time. AI‑enabled EAM or CMMS systems ingest this data and advanced analysis tools and processes identify, detect and address issues.
Based on this data and the subsequent analysis, algorithms build models that predict when future potential problems with a piece of equipment might arise. Predictive maintenance has been proven to lower maintenance costs, decrease asset downtime by 35–50% and increase asset lifespan by 20–40%.
To determine whether your asset performance management (APM) strategy is working, it’s critical to select the right success metrics.
Key performance indicators (KPIs) let you know whether a strategic approach is successful and help business leaders understand the impact of their decisions. Choosing the wrong metric can give an inaccurate picture of an asset’s performance and cause companies to take strategic decisions that might be harmful over time.
Many factors influence how performance metrics are identified, including the industry your organization operates in, its size, the kinds of assets it owns and its overall business priorities. Here are a few proven methods companies use to measure the success of their APM initiatives.
Perhaps the most widely used metric for evaluating the success of any maintenance program is the mean time between failure (MTBF) of the assets it has been made responsible for repairing.
MTBF is a simple formula that calculates the average amount of time between needed repairs on a piece of equipment. It does this calculation by dividing the total time of operation by the number of failures during that period. A maintenance department whose assets have a high MTBF is assessed as “strong.”
The MTTR represents the average time that it takes from a breakdown or maintenance-required work stoppage until all requisite maintenance is performed and a piece of machinery or production has been restored. MTTR factors in the time it takes to diagnose, repair and return equipment to normal function. A shorter MTTR means faster recovery and less unplanned downtime.
Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) is determined by multiplying three metrics:
Planned maintenance percentage (PMP) measures the amount of planned maintenance performed as compared to the total amount of maintenance performed. PMP calculates planned maintenance hours as a share of total maintenance time, combining both planned and unplanned work.
A higher PMP indicates a higher percentage of planned maintenance, a positive indicator that more resources are being applied to preventive and predictive maintenance as opposed to responding to unexpected breakdowns. Conversely, a low PMP would indicate a more reactive and likely more disruptive and expensive, approach to maintenance. A PMP of 80% or higher is recognized as the benchmark for a successful APM program.
Two complementary metrics for evaluating the success of an APM program include how quickly and effectively maintenance technicians close their assigned work order tickets. The second measures the overall percentage of completed compared with incomplete work.
Typically associated with long-term maintenance strategies, the frequency of emergency maintenance tasks metric provides insights into the effectiveness of a preventive maintenance program. The better a maintenance department is at performing preventive maintenance, the rarer breakdowns requiring emergency intervention should be.
While there are many key metrics for measuring the performance of an asset performance management (APM) strategy, return on investment (ROI) provides a view of the overall value of the entire program. ROI expresses that value in financial terms that can influence broader business operations. By calculating the ROI of an APM, decision-makers across an organization can justify APM-related expenses or optimize their asset strategy over time.
The first step in calculating the ROI of an APM program is to establish a baseline of the total cost of maintenance fees. You also need to determine the frequency of machine breakdowns and the amount of unplanned downtime an organization experiences before or without an APM solution. This baseline provides the reference point needed to quantify the financial impact of implementing APM.
After establishing this baseline, an APM program is evaluated on various cost-saving and revenue-preserving categories, including the following metrics:
While savings from reduced maintenance and recovered production can be realized quickly, long-term value derived from machinery optimization and risk mitigation takes longer to materialize. For this reason, it’s important to track APM savings over more than one budgetary cycle after establishing a robust baseline.
With enough time and data, an organization can calculate its ROI by subtracting the total cost of an APM program from the total financial value it generates. It then divides that result by the total cost to express the value as a percentage.
While specific use cases vary across a wide range of industrial applications, asset performance management (APM) solutions offer several valuable benefits to many different types of operations: