Organizations can know they have data health problems, without knowing how those problems actually map to events in their pipelines or attributes of the data itself. This puts organizations in a reactive position in relation to their data SLAs.
The problem described is an observability problem, and it stems from the inability to see the context of pipeline performance due to a fractured and incomplete view of their data delivery. If you are only looking at success/failure counts to understand pipeline health, you may miss critical problems that affect your data SLAs (like uptime), for example, a task running late causing a missed data delivery, and how that might cascade to broader issues.
At Databand, we believe data observability goes deeper than monitoring by adding more context to system metrics, providing a deeper view of system operations, and indicating whether engineers need to step in and apply a fix.
Observability for production data pipelines is hard, and it’s only getting harder. As companies become more data-focused, the data infrastructure they use becomes more sophisticated. This increased complexity has caused pipeline failures to become more common and more expensive.
Data Observability within organizations is fractured for a variety of reasons. Pipelines interact with multiple systems and environments. Each system has its own monitoring in place. On top of that, different data teams in your organization might have ownership over parts of your stack.