1. Latency and real-time analysis
Challenge:
Accessing stored data directly typically incurs less latency compared to virtualized data retrieval, which can impede real-time predictive maintenance analyses, where timely insights are crucial.
Design considerations:
We need a two-pronged approach to ensure real-time insights and minimize delays in accessing virtualized data. First, we’ll analyze the network infrastructure and optimize data transfer protocols. This can involve techniques like network segmentation to reduce congestion or using faster protocols like UDP for certain data types. By optimizing data transfer, we decrease the time it takes to retrieve the information you need. Second, we’ll implement data refresh strategies to maintain a reasonably up-to-date dataset for analysis. This might involve using batch jobs to perform incremental data updates at regular intervals, balancing the update frequency with the resources required. Striking this balance is crucial: too frequent updates can strain resources, while infrequent updates can lead to outdated data and inaccurate predictions. By combining these strategies, we can achieve both minimal latency and a fresh data set for optimal analysis.
2. Balancing update frequency and source system strain
Challenge:
Continuously querying virtualized data for real-time insights can overload the source systems, impacting their performance. This poses a critical concern for predictive analysis or AI, which depends on frequent data updates.
Design considerations:
To optimize query frequency for your predictive analysis and reporting, need to carefully design how it accesses data. This includes focusing on retrieving only critical data points and potentially using data replication tools for real-time access from multiple sources. Additionally, consider scheduling or batching data retrievals for specific crucial points instead of constant querying, reducing strain on data systems and improving overall model performance.
3. Virtualization layer abstraction and developer benefits
Advantage:
The virtualization layer in the data platform acts as an abstraction layer. This means developers building AI/ML or data mining applications for business once the abstraction layer is ready without worrying about where the data is physically stored or its specific storage details. They can focus on designing the core logic of their models without getting bogged down in data management complexities. This leads to faster development cycles and quicker deployment of these applications.
Benefits for developers:
By utilizing an abstraction layer, developers working on data analytics can focus on the core logic of their models. This layer acts as a shield, hiding the complexities of data storage management. This translates to faster development times as developers don’t need to get bogged down in data intricacies, ultimately leading to quicker deployment of the predictive maintenance models.
4. Storage optimization considerations
Storage optimization techniques like normalization or denormalization might not directly apply to all functions of a specific data analysis application, but they play a significant role when adopting a hybrid approach. This approach involves integrating both ingested data and data accessed through virtualization within the chosen platform.
Assessing the tradeoffs between these techniques helps ensure optimal storage usage for both ingested and virtualized data sets. These design considerations are crucial for building effective ML solutions using virtualized data on the data platform.