The simple answer: spear phishing is a special type of phishing attack.

Phishing is any cyberattack that uses malicious email messages, text messages, or voice calls to trick people into sharing sensitive data (e.g., credit card numbers or social security numbers), downloading malware, visiting malicious websites, sending money to the wrong people, or otherwise themselves, their associates or their employers. Phishing is the most common cybercrime attack vector, or method; 300,479 phishing attacks were reported to the FBI in 2022.

Most phishing is bulk phishing—impersonal messages that appear to be from a widely-known and trusted sender (e.g., a global brand), sent en masse to millions of people in hope that some small percentage of recipients will take the bait.

Spear phishing is targeted phishing. Specifically, spear phishing messages are

  • sent to a specific individual or group of individuals
  • highly personalized, based on research
  • crafted to appear to come from a sender who has a relationship to the recipient—say, a coworker or colleague the recipient knows, or someone to whom the recipient is accountable, such as a manager or company executive.

Spear phishing attacks are much rarer than phishing attacks, but they pursue much larger or more valuable rewards and, when successful, have a much larger impact than bulk phishing scams. According to one recent report, spear phishing emails represented just 0.1 percent of all emails during a 12-month period, but accounted for 66 percent of data breaches during those same 12 months. In one high-profile spear phishing attack, scammers stole more than USD 100 million from Facebook and Google by posing as legitimate vendors and tricking employees into paying fraudulent invoices.

What’s different about a spear phishing attack?

Spear phishing attacks employ several strategies that make it more difficult to identify and more convincing than bulk phishing attacks.

Credibility based on extensive research

To make their targeted attacks more believable, spear phishers research their senders and their targets—so they can impersonate the senders effectively, and so they can present a credible story to the targets.

Many spear phishers get to know their senders and their victims through social media. With people sharing information so freely on social media and elsewhere online, cybercriminals can now find relevant and detailed information without much digging. For instance, studying a victim’s LinkedIn page might help a scammer better understand an employee’s job responsibilities and learn which vendors their organization uses, so they can more effectively impersonate a reliable sender of a fictitious invoice.

According to a report from Omdia, hackers craft convincing spear phishing emails after about 100 minutes of general Google searching. Some hackers may even hack into company email accounts or messaging apps and spend more time observing conversations to gather more detailed context on relationships.

Specific social engineering tactics

Social engineering tactics use psychological manipulation to trick people into believing false premises or taking unwise actions. Based on their research, spear phishing scammers can craft believable situations, or pretexts, as part of their messages—e.g., We’ve decided to go with a new law firm for the land deal, can you please wire the attached invoice to cover their retainer fee? They can create a sense of urgency to drive recipients to act rashly—e.g., Payment is already overdue—please send funds before midnight to avoid late fees. Some even use social engineering to keep the scam a secret—e.g., Please be discreet, keep this quiet until the deal is announced later this week.

Multiple message types

Increasingly, spear phishing scams combine messages from multiple media for added credibility. For example, spear phishing messages include phone numbers the target can call for confirmation; the numbers are answered by fraudulent reps. Some scammers followed up spear phishing emails with fraudulent SMS text messages (called smishing). More recently, scammers have followed up spear phishing emails with fake phone calls (called vishing) that used artificial intelligence-based impersonations of the alleged sender’s voice.

Types of spear phishing

Spear phishing attacks are divided further into subtypes, based on who the attacks target, or who they impersonate.

Business email compromise

Business email compromise (BEC), is a spear phishing email scam that attempts to steal money or sensitive data from a business.

In a BEC attack, a cybercriminal (or cybercriminal gang) sends employees of the target organization emails that appear to be from a manager or fellow employee—or from a vendor, partner, customer or other associate known to the recipient. The emails are written to trick the employees into paying fraudulent invoices, making wire transfers to bogus bank accounts, or sending sensitive information to someone who allegedly needs it. (In rarer cases, BEC scammers may try to spread ransomware or malware by asking victims to open an attachment or click a malicious link.)

Some BEC scammers take the extra step of stealing or obtaining the sender’s email account credentials (username and password) and sending the email directly from that sender’s actual account. This makes the scam appear more authentic than one sent from even the most carefully impersonated or spoofed email account.

In a special type of BEC attack, called CEO fraud, the scammer masquerades as a high-ranking executive, pressuring lower-level employees to wire funds or disclose sensitive data.

Whale phishing

Whale phishing is a spear phishing attack that targets the highest-profile, highest-value victims—or “whales”—including board members, C-level management, and non-corporate targets like celebrities and politicians. Whale phishers know these individuals have things only high-value targets can provide, including large sums of cash, access to highly valuable or highly confidential information, and reputations worth protecting. Unsurprisingly, whaling attacks typically require much more detailed research than other spear phishing attacks.

Example of a spear phishing attack

In August 2022, cloud-based communication giant Twilio suffered a sophisticated spear phishing attack that compromised its network.

Phishers targeted Twilio employees using fake SMS text messages that appeared to come from the company’s IT department. The messages claimed the employees’ passwords had expired or their schedules had changed and directed them to a fake website that required them to reenter their login credentials. To make the phishing scam even more realistic, the hackers included “Twilio,” “Okta,” and “SSO” (short for single sign-on) in the fake website’s URL to further convince employees to click the malicious link.

Using the login credentials from employees who fell for the messages, the scammers broke into Twilio’s corporate network.

The phishing scam made news not only because of its sophistication—with one expert calling it “one of the more sophisticated long-form hacks in history”—but also because of Twilio’s unique position as a B2B company, servicing many other tech companies. As a result, several other tech companies found themselves implicated in the phishing scam, including Twilio-owned Authy, a two-factor authentication service, and Signal, an encrypted messaging app that used Twilio for SMS verification services.

Ultimately, the Twilio attack impacted over 163 of its customer organizations, including 1,900 Signal accounts. Further, it proved that spear phishing attacks like the one Twilio faced are becoming increasingly common.

Staying ahead of spear phishing and phishing attempts

Email security tools, antivirus software, and multi-factor authentication are all critical first lines of defense against phishing and spear phishing. Organizations also increasingly rely on security awareness training and phishing simulations to better educate their employees on the dangers and tactics of phishing and spear phishing attacks.

However, no security system is complete without state-of-the-art threat detection and response capabilities to catch cybercriminals in real time and mitigate the impact of successful phishing campaigns.

IBM Security® QRadar® SIEM applies machine learning and user behavior analytics (UBA) to network traffic alongside traditional logs for smarter threat detection and faster remediation. In a recent Forrester study, QRadar SIEM helped security analysts save more than 14,000 hours over three years by identifying false positives, reduce time spent investigating incidents by 90%, and reduce their risk of experiencing a serious security breach by 60%.* With QRadar SIEM, resource-strained security teams have the visibility and analytics they need to detect threats rapidly and take immediate, informed action to minimize the effects of an attack.

Learn more about IBM QRadar SIEM

*The Total Economic Impact™ of IBM Security QRadar SIEM is a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of IBM, April 2023. Based on projected results of a composite organization modeled from four interviewed IBM customers. Actual results will vary based on client configurations and conditions and, therefore, generally expected results cannot be provided.

Register and download the study
Was this article helpful?
YesNo

More from Security

Data privacy examples

9 min read - An online retailer always gets users' explicit consent before sharing customer data with its partners. A navigation app anonymizes activity data before analyzing it for travel trends. A school asks parents to verify their identities before giving out student information. These are just some examples of how organizations support data privacy, the principle that people should have control of their personal data, including who can see it, who can collect it, and how it can be used. One cannot overstate…

How to prevent prompt injection attacks

8 min read - Large language models (LLMs) may be the biggest technological breakthrough of the decade. They are also vulnerable to prompt injections, a significant security flaw with no apparent fix. As generative AI applications become increasingly ingrained in enterprise IT environments, organizations must find ways to combat this pernicious cyberattack. While researchers have not yet found a way to completely prevent prompt injections, there are ways of mitigating the risk.  What are prompt injection attacks, and why are they a problem? Prompt…

Building the human firewall: Navigating behavioral change in security awareness and culture

4 min read - The latest findings of the IBM X-Force® Threat Intelligence Index report highlight a shift in the tactics of attackers. Rather than using traditional hacking methods, there has been a significant 71% surge in attacks where criminals are exploiting valid credentials to infiltrate systems. Info stealers have seen a staggering 266% increase in their utilization, emphasizing their role in acquiring these credentials. Their objective is straightforward: exploit the path of least resistance, often through unsuspecting employees, to obtain valid credentials. Organizations…

IBM Newsletters

Get our newsletters and topic updates that deliver the latest thought leadership and insights on emerging trends.
Subscribe now More newsletters