YAML and JSON share similarities in data representation, however, YAML stands out for its readability, expressiveness and support for complex data structures. YAML is a superset of JSON, meaning that it contains all the features of JSON in addition to expanded features and commands.
JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) utilizes a more explicit syntax with braces {}, brackets [], and commas. While concise and widely used, JSON's syntax might become less readable, especially in larger datasets. JSON's support for data structures is comparatively limited, primarily featuring arrays, objects and scalar values.
JSON is often favored for its cross-compatibility for data interchange in web applications and APIs, while YAML is more commonly used in scenarios where human readability and more complex data structures are required, like configuration files and certain types of data documentation and exchange.2
When compared to XML, YAML offers a more concise and human-friendly alternative, emphasizing simplicity and ease of comprehension in data representation and exchange. YAML and XML have fundamental differences in syntax and purpose.
XML is highly structured, relying on explicit opening and closing tags, making it slightly confusing. In contrast, YAML employs a simpler and more natural language-like structure, focusing on readability through indentation and key-value pairs without explicit closing tags.