#### Quantum Computing

# Hitting a Quantum Volume Chord: IBM Quantum adds six new systems with Quantum Volume 32

July 7, 2020 | Written by: Jay Gambetta and Doug McClure

Categorized: Quantum Computing

Share this post:

Six months after the first Quantum Volume 32 demonstration at the beginning of 2020, IBM now hosts eight quantum computing systems that cross the QV32 performance threshold available to IBM Q Network organizations. Six of these are completely new systems — three 27-qubit *Falcon* processors, and four 5-qubit *Canary* processors.

Improvements to hardware design and a new “target rotary” pulsing technique enabled the rapid roll-out of our QV32 systems. Target rotary increases the fidelity of two-qubit entangling operations while mitigating spectator errors. Our entire fleet now includes 22 systems that deliver generational learning from all aspects of quantum research and development to our clients and users.

As quantum systems with increasing numbers of qubits are developed, performance benchmarking in complete generality becomes an intractable problem. We know that overall device performance requires high fidelity one- and two-qubit gates; however, the computational power of the system is also determined by other parameters such as the number of qubits, their connectivity, and unintended interactions between neighboring qubits.

To account for this, we need to consider a holistic metric such as the Quantum Volume: a hardware-agnostic metric defined to take into account the number of qubits, connectivity, as well as gate and measurement errors. Material improvements to underlying physical hardware, such as increases in coherence times and reduction of device crosstalk, as well as software improvements to circuit compiler efficiency, can both result in measurable progress in Quantum Volume.

## Reducing spectator errors

These new, more powerful systems reflect our recent efforts to reduce spectator errors, both by lowering the upper error-bound set by hardware design and with new control sequences.

“Spectator” errors are another important limitation to quantum volume: nearby qubits that aren’t participating in a gate can corrupt system performance in ways not apparent when the gate is performed in isolation. This corruption can be in the form of unwanted entanglement or classical crosstalk with the spectator qubits during the gate.

We are currently investigating tools to detect and mitigate spectator errors. In our recent arXiv release, “Reducing unitary and spectator errors in cross resonance with optimized rotary echoes,” we show that “target rotary” pulsing — a resonant drive of the target qubit during a cross-resonance (CR) gate — corrects gate errors that result from the standard CR echo pulse while simultaneously reducing undesired interactions between the target qubit and its spectators.

Not only does this work improve the performance of today’s IBM Quantum systems, the new models presented in this paper reflect a deeper understanding that will inspire the next generation of devices and further research. While Quantum Volume still needs to improve substantially to provide quantum advantage in practical commercial applications, techniques such as target rotary pulsing, which addresses often-neglected errors, bring us closer to this goal.

*Also contributing to this article: IBM Research scientists Isaac Lauer, Easwar Magesan, Emily Pritchett, and Neereja Sundaresan.*

## IBM Quantum

### Quantum starts here

**Jay Gambetta**

IBM Fellow and Vice President, Quantum Computing

**Doug McClure**

Manager of Quantum System Deployment, IBM Q

### Quantum Conundrum: Clifford Group Investigation Unexpectedly Reveals New Quantum Advantage Proof

When we began our current line of investigation, the goal was to study the structural property of the Clifford group, describing a set of transformations that generate entanglement, play an important role in quantum computing error correction, and are used in (randomized) benchmarking. In a series of one-thing-leads-to-another findings, however, we ended up discovering a new mathematical proof of quantum advantage – the elusive threshold at which quantum computers outperform classical machines in certain use cases.

### IBM Roundtable: Building a Quantum Workforce Requires Interdisciplinary Education and the Promise of Real Jobs

The ability to harness quantum-mechanical phenomena such as superposition and entanglement to perform computation obviously poses a number of difficulties. Add in the need to make these systems perform meaningful work, and you’ve raised the stakes considerably. Creating a pipeline of talented, well-trained academics and professionals who can meet those challenges was the subject of IBM’s July 28 virtual roundtable, “How to Build a Quantum Workforce.” Watch the replay, here.

### Quantum Computing Education Must Reach a Diversity of Students

IBM recently launched several initiatives to help inspire new students and begin building tomorrow’s quantum computing workforce. Our Quantum Educators program, in particular, provides professors and students with access to IBM quantum computers as well as the latest learning resources we’ve developed to help them get started programming and experimenting on quantum computers.