• Add a Comment
  • Edit
  • More Actions v
  • Quarantine this Entry

Comments (1)

1 localhost commented Trackback

"ESBs good; ESB-only projects bad." Not quite clear enough.

 
I read your article as going a bit further: "ESBs good; ESB-FIRST projects bad." That is, the user pays lip service to eventually (eg "phase 2") "putting an SOA on top of" the ESB infrastructure that is the sole focus of "phase 1". Typcially, the organization building out the ESB infrastructure assume some other part of the organization is responsible of the "SOA stuff" on top. I took you piece as critizing this approach as well.
 
-- Nick

Add a Comment Add a Comment