HomeIBV blog

C-suite executives set their sights back on traditional targets

March 15, 2017

Two years ago, a new phenomenon was dominating the minds of CxOs the world over.

One executive from the US transportation industry described it succinctly as: “The ‘Uber syndrome’ — where a competitor with a completely different business model enters your industry and flattens you.” Many other business leaders professed the same fear — that new rivals from outside their industry could easily turn their companies into roadkill.

Today, the sentiment is moving in the opposite direction. Despite traditional industry boundaries continuing to erode in the face of digital disruption, CxOs are saying that future competition is more likely to come from within their own industry.

C-suite executives now expect competition to come from within their own industries.

Business trends change constantly, and executives need to remain well-informed, well-prepared and extremely agile. That’s why the IBM Institute for Business Value (IBV) created the Global C-suite Study program. We’ll publish the full set of results from our latest research in early 2018. But we don’t want executives to wait a year for information that could be vitally important to business today. Throughout 2017 we will release interesting — and sometimes unexpected — insights through monthly blog posts and more detailed quarterly reports.

CxOs’ shifting perspective on competition was the first major change that emerged as we compared new data to 2015 findings. Then, CxOs said they were prioritizing the development of new markets and territories instead of trying to grow existing ones. And they were looking to external partners for sources of innovation rather than their own internal capabilities.

By contrast, it seems that today’s CxOs are starting to get a grip on the threat of industry convergence. According to early data, which includes input from about 1,880 executives globally, CxOs are moving away from knee-jerk reactions. They are turning toward more methodical, considered approaches. They are carefully defining their go-to-market strategies while reassessing with whom they go to market. Instead of focusing on new, unproven markets in the search for growth, they’re looking to find a more even balance.

C-suite executives are seeking more balance between traditional and new markets.

In what might be an encouraging sign for research and development investment, executives say they expect more innovation to come from within their businesses in the near future. It’s unclear whether this shift in CxOs’ mindsets is driven by internal financial and operational constraints, or reflects external factors such as increasing geopolitical uncertainty, the elimination of free-trade agreements or a tightening in the regulatory environment.

C-suite executives will seek to lessen their reliance on external partners for innovation.

Why did executives reverse their opinions so quickly? Was the threat from digital invaders overblown, or was it just a matter of time before industry incumbents began to reassert themselves? We’ll continue to explore business leaders’ response to change in our future monthly insights and reports. Stay tuned!

This blog is the first in a series of monthly insights that highlight preliminary findings and emerging trends from our 19th Global C-suite Study. The study is based on interviews with more than 10,000 CxOs.

Bookmark this blog  

Meet the author

Stephen Marshall
Global C-suite Study Programme Manager, Asia-Pacific Global Business Services


Related blogs

Industry disruption is here to stay according to research institutions, top analysts and the business press, but many C-suite executives (CxOs) beg to differ.

Executives have heard many warnings about the threat of disruption. Yet some organizations appear to be doing little to prepare for a more dynamic, uncertain future.

Nearly half of the more than 7,000 executives we’ve surveyed so far for the IBM Global C-suite Study report little to no disruption in their industries. At first, this finding surprised us. Now, we have a possible explanation for it: Some regions seem to be more affected by disruption than others.

Business cycles are a given. They are driven by the gravitational forces of innovative disruption, regulatory changes and competitive dissonance. The speed of technology innovation has accelerated the speed of business cycle changes.

It has become something of a cliché to hear that the pace of change in business continues to accelerate.