Troubleshooting
Problem
Understanding implications of explicit transaction with LOCAL or NO transaction:
In a cluster (Tangosol) node 1 has LOCAL_TRANSACTION while the other has NO_TRANSACTION. The flow code that is running in this cluster is doing explicit transactions. The JDBC insert is inside a loop and the commit is outside the loop. Rollback is in the catch block.
What's the recommendation of changing the settings, either LOCAL or NO_TRANSACTION?
Is there any log that occurs on the server when the setting is changed that could be reviewed to see if someone changed this setting?
If recommendation is NO_TRANSACTION, should the explicit code be removed? If it's not removed will the ROLLBACKS still work?
Document Location
Worldwide
Log InLog in to view more of this document
Was this topic helpful?
Document Information
Modified date:
19 March 2025
UID
ibm17191001