Troubleshooting
Problem
Why do I see some "Session Ignored" set as "Yes STAP" and some "No" for the same type of session which I expect my "IGNORE S-TAP SESSION" rule to set to "Yes STAP"
Symptom
Consider a Policy rule that will IGNORE S-TAP SESSION for certain types of Session.
It can be the case that a Guardium GUI report will show a mixture of rows with two similar sessions having column Session:Session Ignored showing "Yes STAP" and "No"
Users expect to see the Session:Session Ignored columns showng "Yes STAP" for all the same type of session that would trigger the "IGNORE S-TAP SESSION rule
Document Location
Worldwide
[{"Business Unit":{"code":"BU048","label":"IBM Software"},"Product":{"code":"SSMPHH","label":"IBM Security Guardium"},"ARM Category":[],"Platform":[{"code":"PF025","label":"Platform Independent"}],"Version":"All Version(s)","Line of Business":{"code":"LOB76","label":"Data Platform"}}]
Log InLog in to view more of this document
This document has the abstract of a technical article that is available to authorized users once you have logged on. Please use Log in button above to access the full document. After log in, if you do not have the right authorization for this document, there will be instructions on what to do next.
Was this topic helpful?
Document Information
Modified date:
09 March 2021
UID
ibm16219262