IBM Support

OW04566: 2 INOPS-APPN HOST TO HOST PU ACT FAILURE

A fix is available

Subscribe

You can track all active APARs for this component.

 

APAR status

  • Closed as program error.

Error description

  • A link failure occured during activation of an APPN Host to
    Host Channel connection. This caused a station INOP (message
    IST259I) on the underlying MPC subchannel before the link
    was fully active. Immediately after the station INOP, another
    station INOP was received for the same link failure even though
    nothing further had failed. Also, if XID exchange fails during
    APPN Host to Host Channel connection activation and message
    IST467I is received for a CONTACTED Type 0B, subsequent messages
    IST468I, 469I, 470I, and 471I may contain erroneous XID data.
    

Local fix

Problem summary

  • ****************************************************************
    * USERS AFFECTED: All using APPN Host to Host Channel          *
    *                 connections.                                 *
    ****************************************************************
    * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: A link failure occured during           *
    *                      activation of an APPN Host to Host      *
    *                      Channel connection. This caused a       *
    *                      station INOP (message IST259I) on the   *
    *                      underlying MPC link before the link     *
    *                      was fully active. Immediately after     *
    *                      the station INOP, another station INOP  *
    *                      was received for the same link failure  *
    *                      even though nothing further had         *
    *                      failed.                                 *
    *                                                              *
    *                      Also during activation of an APPN       *
    *                      Host to Host Channel connection, if     *
    *                      XID exchange fails and IST467I is       *
    *                      issued for a CONTACTED type 0B,         *
    *                      subsequent messages 468I, 469I,         *
    *                      470I and 471I may contain erroneous     *
    *                      XID data. It is possible in certain     *
    *                      scenarios that an addressing exception  *
    *                      (0C4) ABEND may occur.                  *
    ****************************************************************
    * RECOMMENDATION:                                              *
    ****************************************************************
    If a link failure occurs during the activation of an MPC
    subchannel that is part of a TRLE for an APPN Host to Host
    channel (AHHC) PU, the INOP will be received in MPC for that
    subchannel. The INOP will cause activation failure (negative
    response to OPENPATH) and the request for inactivation of the
    APPN Host to Host channel PU. ISTTSC9L will currently send an
    INOP to PUNS because of the negative response to OPENPATH.
    Then, when the INOP is received from MPC, ISTTSC9L will send
    another INOP to PUNS for the same error. Though not fatal, it
    does cause redundant messages IST259I, IST493I, IST619I and
    IST129I, making it appear there were 2 link errors rather than
    one.
    
    If an XID exchange error occurs during the activation of an MPC
    subchannel that is part of a TRLE for an APPN Host to Host
    channel (AHHC) PU, and CONTACT has already been received from
    PUNS by the AHHC component, AHHC will correctly attempt to
    send a CONTACTED(0B) to PUNS to indicate the failure. However,
    the module that sends the CONTACTED(0B), ISTTSC9C, currently
    cleans up parts of the NCB before building the CONTACTED.
    One of those parts of the NCB that is cleaned up is the
    releasing of the TSCB that contains the XID that was in error.
    Hence, the part of the code that builds the XID for the
    CONTACTED points to low core, and the CONTACTED is built
    in error. In a real MVS system, this could cause an ABEND or
    could cause erroneous XID data in a message, depending on
    what storage is pointed to.
    

Problem conclusion

  • The fix for the double INOP problem is for module ISTTSC9L
    to set a bit in the ISTAHNCB when a station INOP is sent to
    PUNS. If a subsequent INOP is received from MPC, it is merely
    discarded.
    
    The fix for the bad XID data in the CONTACTED(0B) is for
    module ISTTSC9C to invoke the subroutine that builds the
    CONTACTED(0B) before invoking subroutine CLEANNCB to clean
    up the NCB.
    

Temporary fix

Comments

APAR Information

  • APAR number

    OW04566

  • Reported component name

    VTAM V4 MVS/ESA

  • Reported component ID

    569511701

  • Reported release

    201

  • Status

    CLOSED PER

  • PE

    NoPE

  • HIPER

    NoHIPER

  • Special Attention

    NoSpecatt / Xsystem

  • Submitted date

    1994-04-24

  • Closed date

    1994-04-29

  • Last modified date

    1994-08-12

  • APAR is sysrouted FROM one or more of the following:

  • APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following:

    UW06336

Modules/Macros

  • ISTAHNCB ISTTSC9C ISTTSC9L
    

Fix information

  • Fixed component name

    VTAM V4 MVS/ESA

  • Fixed component ID

    569511701

Applicable component levels

  • R201 PSY UW06336

       UP94/05/10 P F405

Fix is available

  • Select the PTF appropriate for your component level. You will be required to sign in. Distribution on physical media is not available in all countries.

[{"Business Unit":{"code":"BU054","label":"Systems w\/TPS"},"Product":{"code":"SG19M","label":"APARs - z\/OS environment"},"Component":"","ARM Category":[],"Platform":[{"code":"PF025","label":"Platform Independent"}],"Version":"201","Edition":"","Line of Business":{"code":"","label":""}},{"Business Unit":{"code":"BU054","label":"Systems w\/TPS"},"Product":{"code":"SSCY4DZ","label":"DO NOT USE"},"Component":"","ARM Category":[],"Platform":[{"code":"PF025","label":"Platform Independent"}],"Version":"201","Edition":"","Line of Business":{"code":"","label":""}}]

Document Information

Modified date:
12 August 1994