Explanation
VTAM® ignores
the GWPATH definition statement statement in the
CDRM major node definition configname.
VTAM issues this message when a
GWPATH definition statement follows a CDRM statement, and the CDRM
statement defines a resource in this network. This condition can occur
in one of the following ways:
- No NETWORK definition statement preceded the CDRM statement; this
implies that the CDRM statement is defined for a resource in the host’s
network.
- The NETID operand on the preceding NETWORK definition statement
indicated that the NETWORK statement was for this host’s network.
- The GWPATH statement cannot be coded in a CDRM major node if the
host is not gateway capable, that is, is not started with GWSSCP=YES.
- The class of service (CoS) name as known in the adjacent network
is invalid. The keyword value might be too large, the value might
contain invalid characters, or the value might not start with an alphabetic
character (A–Z). This implies that an invalid COS name might
be used for the SSCP-SSCP session.
System action
VTAM ignores
the GWPATH definition statement statement.
Operator response
Save the system log for problem determination.
System programmer response
Examine the CDRM major node to determine
whether one of the following conditions apply:
- A GWPATH statement could be coded (that is, the preceding CDRM
statement is intended to define a CDRM in another network).
- A GWPATH statement should not have been coded (that is, the preceding
CDRM statement is intended to define a CDRM in this network).
- If the host needs to be gateway capable, specify GWSSCP=YES when VTAM is started.
- If the host does not need to be gateway capable, remove the GWPATH
statement from the CDRM definition.
Routing code
Descriptor code