IST331I
CONFIG configname BYPASSED — ‘MAXSUBA’ VALUES CONFLICT

Explanation

VTAM® could not add the major node configname to the network for one of the following reasons:
  • The MAXSUBA start option value in effect at the time the major node was first activated does not equal the value specified in the MAXSUBA start option.
  • If the major node is a communication controller, the MAXSUBA value specified in the NCP BUILD generation definition statement does not equal the value specified in the MAXSUBA start option.
MAXSUBA is used only for migration purposes in order to communicate with a pre-V3R1 level of VTAM.

System action

VTAM does not include major node configname in the VTAM network.

Operator response

Save the system log for problem determination.

System programmer response

The MAXSUBA values must match. Change the appropriate VTAM definition in the definition library.
  • If the MAXSUBA value in the start option does not match the value that was in effect when the major node was activated, restart VTAM with the correct MAXSUBA value.
  • For a communication controller, if the MAXSUBA value specified in the BUILD definition statement is incorrect, correct the BUILD definition statement, and regenerate the NCP.
Note: MAXSUBA can be coded on the NETWORK definition statement in the NCP. In a nonnative network, this is the MAXSUBA value that must match.

See the z/OS Communications Server: SNA Resource Definition Reference for more information on the MAXSUBA start option and the BUILD definition statement.

Routing code

2

Descriptor code

5