This example explains the differences between
the two options:
Consolidated automatic journal types summed into
base
Table 1. Consolidated automatic journal types summed
into base
| Company |
Amount |
Automatic Journal Type |
Journal number |
Result |
| 2500 |
2 273 818 |
BASE |
- |
Base includes reported values and automatic journal
types from lower levels |
Consolidated automatic journal types on subgroups
Table 2. Consolidated automatic journal types on subgroups
| Company |
Amount |
Automatic Journal Type |
Journal number |
Result |
| 2500 |
2 997 400 |
BASE |
- |
BASE includes reported values only |
| 2500 |
3 840 |
1 |
0 |
Automatic journal type from lower level |
| 2500 |
-20 240 |
40 |
0 |
Automatic journal type from lower level |
| 2500 |
-99 240 |
60 |
0 |
Automatic journal type from lower level |
| 2500 |
-14 190 |
61 |
0 |
Automatic journal type from lower level |
| 2500 |
43 560 |
65 |
0 |
Automatic journal type from lower level |
| 2500 |
-146 580 |
70 |
0 |
Automatic journal type from lower level |
| 2500 |
-476 326 |
8 |
0 |
Automatic journal type from lower level |
| 2500 |
-14 406 |
90 |
0 |
Automatic journal type from lower level |
| Total |
2 273 818 |
|
|
Same result as when Consolidated Automatic
Journal Types as Base is selected. |