Lifecycle of follow-on tasks
Follow-on tasks support people when they want to delegate parts of their assigned work to other people, and the control over the completion of the work.
- When any task in the chain is suspended, the entire chain is suspended. Each task is put into the suspended substate.
- A suspended chain of follow-on tasks can be resumed by any task in the chain.
- If a task in the chain escalates, all of the follow-on tasks in the chain are escalated.
- When any task in the chain is terminated, the entire chain is terminated.
- When the first task in the chain expires, the last task in the chain is put into the expired state.
- Lifecycle operations that do not conflict with the parent task are always supported. These are operations, such as claim, cancel claim, complete, creation and start of subtasks or follow-on tasks.
- Because the chain of follow-on tasks behaves like a single task to the calling component or person (originator), follow-on tasks do not support a duration until expiration, but expire when the expiration timer ends for the first task in the chain.
- Parent tasks and follow-on tasks can be suspended and resumed. This action suspends and resumes all of the tasks in the chain.
- Follow-on tasks can be terminated.
- Follow-on tasks can have their own escalations so that the owner of the predecessor task and the originator of the follow-on task can better control the progress of the follow-on task.
- Follow-on tasks are deleted when their parent task is deleted or restarted. The deletion of individual follow-on tasks using the Business Process Choreographer APIs is not supported.
Example: Follow-on tasks

In an article publishing process, the Review Article task is claimed by John. He is empowered by the process to review and approve the legal aspects of articles as well. However, this article describes the collaboration with a competitor product, and is thus very sensitive from a legal point-of-view. He reviews the informational aspects of the article, and decides to pass the article on to Sarah from the legal department for additional review. He creates a Legal Review task, with a description that highlights his legal concerns. He includes the article as input to the task, and then assigns it to Sarah. He then starts the new task as a follow-on task of his own Review Article task. His task enters the forwarded state, and the work on it ends. The process waits for the response from the invoked Review Article task.
Sarah claims her Legal Review follow-on task and starts reviewing the legal aspects. She makes some comments, and completes her task. The output message of the follow-on task is passed to the BPEL process. The article publishing process continues with the output that it associates with the Review Article task, but that comes from the Legal Review follow-on task. Because the Review Article task is an inline human task, it is deleted with the Legal Review task when the BPEL process instance is deleted.