A new twist on this is with our DB2 9 for z/OS support for native SQL procedures. Folks ask me, well now is it OK to have a single SQL statement in a native SQL procedure?
The thing is, the native SQL procedure is still a package for DB2 to load or at least switch to. So there really still is overhead, not to mention the network time to get over to DB2, as most apps will have to invoke several stored procedures to accomplish their logic. And guess what? Those applications typically invoke the same stored procedures in the same order with the same application logic in between. So... why not make that whole set a single stored procedure?
Bottom line: even with native SQL procedures executing in the DB2 engine rather than the WLM-managed address space, I still recommend an architecture with multiple SQL statements and some business logic rather than a single SQL statement per procedure.
If you do have an architecture with single SQL statements in stored procedures, that's not to say it won't work - it will work, just not as efficiently as it would if you follow the above advice. And even if the single-threaded app performs OK, it won't scale as well as having more SQL statements and logic in the stored procedure, due to longer-held locks over network transmissions as well as some database engine serialization required for external SQL procedures (that part at least is gone in DB2 9).
SQL procedures are absolutely strategic and I do recommend an architecture based on them. The advice I've given other customers is to determine the ones that are invoked most often, analyze the patterns of when they are invoked together from the same applications(s), and work to at least combine those into a single stored procedure with several SQL statements and some logic. If you implement SQL procedures on V8, the switch to DB2 9 native SQL procedures is a snap - drop and create and go, with no change to the code.
So, go, create, reuse, and be happy. :-)[Read More]