RichardSwain 060000VQ8G Tags:  nseries nas marriage lsi ibm ds5000 xiv ds4000 sql exchange onstor engenio netapp ds3000 16,024 Views
When I first started working at IBM, we had a couple of NAS storage devices: NAS 100, NAS 300(G) and the NAS 500. The NAS 100 was a 1U server appliance that used Windows 2000 and so did the NAS 200 device, all built on IBM hardware. The NAS 500 was on an AIX system also from the IBM stock. They were traditional NAS type systems and IBM sold them as let us build the system for you so you don't have to. Somewhat limited in functionality but did the job they were designed to do, serve NAS data.
That same year, IBM decided to partner with a company that was doing some things in the storage market that looked really interesting. Network Appliance had just started gaining steam with their Data Ontap code (6.something if I remember correctly) and had broken the barrier that IBM systems lacked. Unified protocols from a single architecture and integration into other products like Exchange and SQL using their cool snapshot technology. It took some time to get up to speed on the new Netapp technology with snap this and snap that, but soon we were all talking about waffles and aggrs.
Through out the years, the product set grew and so did the hardware offering. We kept up with the releases and for the most part a 20-60 day lag in release of new software was ok for most IBM customers. We partnered with the sales teams and support teams to help grow the N series customers base and to keep them happy. As with any partnership there are bumps along the way and there seemed to be two parents telling each other they agree to disagree. All in all the N series system has been very successful at IBM.
But as the years progressed, new technology like XiV, Real Time Compression, TSM Flash Copy Manager etc, have filled some of those voids previously filled by N series in the IBM portfolio. As with many companies there are products that overlap and N series does overlap over half of the product line at IBM Storage. Positioning became harder as sales teams questioned when to sale N series and when to sell something "blue". We quickly learned that customers really liked what N series brought to the table and how the solution could be so flexible.
Now with the news of Netapp purchasing Engenio I wonder how the relationship between IBM and Netapp will survive. IBM also rebrands the Engenio products as the IBM DS 3k, 4k and 5k. I guess the bigger question is now what will Netapp do with that product line? If history is any indicator, they will simple keep things like they are for some time and slowly move the customers over to a Data OnTap product. The other question is how long will IBM keep sending money over to Netapp for products that we sale and support?
RichardSwain 060000VQ8G Tags:  netapp nseries ibmstorage ftc nas unified storage privacy ibm cloud 7,067 Views
Last week at the IBM Technical Conference I was able to spend some time with a couple of friends discussing technology. It is always interesting to hear their take on where the storage market is going and what lays ahead in the future. As my Netapp pal and I were chatting about the messaging around unified architecture, we both noted that unified to one perceptive is disjointed to another.
IBM and Netapp have been using the term unified for its NAS/SAN device for about 5 years now. The idea is to share a common code base on the same hardware to increase functionality and usability of that storage. Other vendors have gone similar routes using multiple code bases and/or hardware but I see that as a NAS gateway in front of SAN storage system.
This has been very successful in data centers both large and small. But the idea of how we manage storage is changing. Virtualization is changing the idea of how and even where our data may be stored. The term cloud is something of a marketing term but I like the term Storage Utility better. Utility companies such as electric, water, sewer and even cable provide a product to its consumers and storage utility vendors could do the same.
Most people are not concerned about process companies take to make water drinkable or how electricity is generated as long as it is safe, reliable and easy for them to consume. Storage as a Utility is no different, it is only when the storage is offline or hacked in by outsiders the consumers are concerned. There are laws that govern utilities and the FTC has put some privacy laws together to help consumers but I believe we can take it a little further (a blog for another time).
As our data is changing from traditional spinning drives in our data center to a storage utility, we will need some type of bridge that will ease the pain of transition. The main reason people do not adapt new technology is because the transition is often too painful and the benefit of new technology is less than the need to move. Whether it is a software package that helps move data or a hardware device, it will have to give access to both file based data and object based data. This will allow for users to read the files as needed no matter what their connectivity or location. It could also be used to help drive efficiencies up buy allowing data to move from file based (high cost) to object based (lower cost) environments.
Today there are some vendors who have early versions of this type of unified solution. They are bridging the gap between what we have today in private data centers and the future of public utility storage. This is very early in the transition but with this type of technology, we will be able to adapt and provide a better way of storing data. Will it still be called a unified solution? Only the marketing people can tell us that.