Those of you who read this space regularly may recall some referencesI've made to a project underway in my organization called QEDWiki. Unfortunately, I've not been able to say much about it because therehasn't been much made public (internally or externally) for me toreference. But that's beginning to change now and hopefully soon I'llbe able to provide links to places where you can play with andlearn more about our little toy. But in the mean time, here's apointer to a short interview of my VP and IBM Fellow, Rod Smith on QEDWiki, situational applications and programming for the masses. Here's my favorite quote:
"It's hard for me to say 'end-user programming' without cracking a smile. It's been overhyped and overpromised,"
WithQED, we've got a chance of actually getting it right. Watch thisspace for announcements and news regarding QED as it occurs.
David Barnes does a great job explaining QEDWiki on this YouTube video. For anyone interested in QEDWiki, this video is a must-see, especially for the demo of data mashup using a StrikeIron web service to do SMS text messaging. I also liked how he dragged the EditGrid online spreadsheet directly from ProgrammableWeb into QEDWiki.
OK, so I've now heard the fourth different term for what I think is essentially the very samething. IBM tends to use the term Widgets of course to describe blocksof functionality used in different ways. WidgetBox, microformats.organd others use the term Widgets as well. Google has their Gadgets andthe general population of web users seem to use the term Gadgets most often. AOL uses the term Modules, perhaps due to their ModuleT specand the term Components seems to pop up in general conversation aswell. Someday, someone has got to drive the industry to at least cometo concensus on what each of these things are and how they aredifferent -- if at all. My impression is that except for someconceptual differences, we're all rowing in the same direction, we'rejust putting a slightly different spin on it.
I've spent a good amount of time talking with Kevin Lawver from AOL. He is also the author of lots of stuff on Microformats. We're on the same page on this stuff. Perhaps there is an opportunityto help standardize this stuff a bit through microformat definitionsfor these things. He's easily the most interesting person I've met here so far.
Established technology providers, which sell to businesses, arecourting mashup developers, some of whom may be working at start-ups orjust working on their own. Microsoft, Intel, IBM, Yahoo, Autodesk andAOL are among the sponsors of this year's event.
IBM, for example, has a tool called QEDwiki,which is designed to let businesspeople pull together data fromdifferent sources, such as weather information and product shippinginformation, to create a perhaps temporary application.
I will append additional articles to this post as new ones roll in.
I attended a Mashup Camp session this morning on mashup development tools. Itstarted just as you might expect. The moderator asked us to list offtools that we were familiar with, which solicited a long collection ofprogramming languages, libraries, IDEs, etc. QEDWiki was listed as one ofthem. But the next issue was how those tools get access to anduse/display data. This gave rise to the traditional Model ViewController discussion and about the apparent disparity in how access tovarious data sources was achieved. After all, if you're a hard-coreprogrammer, writing code to interact with Joe's Web service is easy. But if you're not, unless it's a simple feed, you're stuck. What'sneeded of course is a widget standard that allows the data provider toallow his data to be used in a variety of mashup platforms. Someoneprotested that the various framework providers would be unlikely to support such a standard, but Iasserted that it was the content providers who had a vested interest inpursuing such a standard. The group seemed to agree. The group alsoseemed to understand the need for a standard interface between thewidgets and the frameworks that support them. Sounds good, right?
Well,maybe not. This morning I proposed leading a discussion on whatstandards might be needed to facilitate the lifecycle of and interactionsbetween widgets. The person passing the microphone around basically took the microphone from me while I wastalking and said to me "You're talking about standards? It will be amiracle if anyone shows up for that!" Also, I've spoken to a couple other folks who have said much thesame thing. This group may not yet be interested in talking standards,even if it is in their interest. A few folks get it. The StrikeIronguys do. So do the Kapow guys. But of course they are both contentproviders. The AOL guys seem to get it too based on their microformatwork. I'll be participating in a session with them on microformatstomorrow morning. And in fact, microformats are of course a form ofstandard. Maybe it's best to just stay away from the term "standard". I need to think about how I might better state things for thisaudience. Anyway, it will be interesting to see who shows up to mysession this afternoon. I'll let you know.
Readers of this blog viewing the video from David Barnes in the previous post may have wondered about IBM DAMIA, which was referenced at the end of the YouTube video. It's a mashup tool with a nifty user interface that lets users plug together a mashup out of feeds or other data sources.
Article in Feb. 21, 2007 Raleigh News & Observer, page 3D (althoughaccessing the article requires registration. I prefer the policyof the New York Times which is to permit access to today's news withoutregistration). Paul is based in Raleigh. When I read aboutemerging technology in the local paper, I am persuaded that it hasmoved from bleeding to leading principally for early adopters and now ready forwide-spread consideration.
In this article, he describes a technique or emerging capability forData Harvesting and summarrizes nicely the value of RSS (Really SimpleSyndication) feeds. His subject is Yahoo Pipes (pipes.yahoo.com) andhow it permits aggregation and sorting of these feeds by keywords such as author, date,and topics. Not too keen on the Pipes's interface, henonetheless praises it for "pointing to a direction that the Net istakiing, one that changes the game by giving the user more control overits vast and changing resources.' Here is the url if you can getto it without registration: http://www.newsobserver.com/1447/story/545355.html
Today at the IMPACT conference, IBM announced IBM Mashup Center which allows business users to drag and drop components from various Websources to easily create, deploy and share customized Web applications inminutes. In the past, our emerging technologies team has demonstrated the usefulness of situational applications for business users particually using QEDwiki mashup maker. From our various customer interactions and lessons learned with QEDwiki, we have evolved the technology with more functions and enhancements into the IBM Mashup Center technology. IBM Mashup Center consists of Lotus Mashups (which is the mashup maker) and the MashupHub technology (a catalog and feed server).
There are a collection of folks here from MIT who are involved in a project called "Future Boston",which is tasked with building tools to facilitate the upcomingchallanges facing the city. In particular the MIT Department of UrbanStudies and Planning and Boston.com are sponsoring contests to see who can build the best mashups in the following areas:
Innovation Landscape: Plots geospatialboundaries of a fast innovating hub
Visualize the ""Innovation Landscape"
Show change over time
Identify key trends and exceptions
Model Maker: Detects the development capacity ofa region
Interpret "live on the ground" of ScienceCity using rich, parcel level data and multiple data sources
Talent Scout: Maps newly-admitted degreecandidates to companies
Investor:Matches dollars to opportunityTap administrative data ad publicdatasets about landuse, ownership, infrastructure, buildings, etc.
Sothe challange is to build mashups using open interoperable OGCprotocols (WMS and WFS) and visualization tools to prototype ways of:
Engaging public in deeper understanding of urban fabric and urban futures
Envisioninglife along MassAveCity (now and in the future) from the point of viewof students, employers, universities, investors, etc.
The goals of the challange are:
Technical: Push the boundaries of web mappingand information visualization
Educational: Use technology to tell a storyabout life in Boston, MA,and the country and visualize how it could be different.
If you're interested, you've got between now and Thursday Night. Check out MIT site and download the data. The award is $500 for each winner. Time to get started!
I'm proud to announce a new technology that's near and dear to my heart: IBM Mashup Hub.
Mashup Hub is intended for a community of Web 2.0 mashup creators and situational application assemblers to come together to share and reuse user interface components (widgets) and enterprise data sources.
We released today on alphaWorks Services in conjunction with a QEDWiki update that contains interoperability with Mashup Hub. In fact, if you go into QED Explorer, you will see the feeds and widgets from the Mashup Hub catalog.
Firefox users can also download a Firefox extension that works with Mashup Hub.
If you haven't already, go ahead and visit the link above and "Try it Now". We look forward to your comments and feedback.
p.s. If you're wondering why I like Mashup Hub so much, it's because, as a developer, I've seen it through from initial concept to prototype to today's release. I hope you enjoy using it as much as our team has enjoyed creating it.
ZDNet blog colleague Joe McKendrick beat me to the punch earlier this week with an excellent analysis of the fascinating ramifications of IBM's recent statementsat the New York PHP Conference aimed mainstreaming mashup and Web 2.0technologies. If IBM is getting seriously involved in this, there mustbe something to it, and certainly Rod Smith's comments are receiving considerable attention.
Check out the "considerable attention" link above. Rodseems to have really gotten the media's attention this time and thereviews seem to be pretty consistent that IBM has landed on somethingreally good here.
From Raleigh to Russia to Oprah, all in the name of emerging Internet technology.
IBM's James Smith, from the JBoss/Emerging Technology team, recently interviewed with Fortune Magazine on IBM's work with partners and labs in Russia for collaborative innovation. One of the most interesting partners -- in Sibera nonetheless-- has been helping IBM develop Web 2.0 plugins and enhance its enterprise mashup maker, QEDWiki. The story goes into how U.S companies are finding smart and creative technology development in Russia's Silicon Valley or in this case, the Silicon Forest. One of the first companies to open in this high-tech location is Axmor, a long time partner of IBM, who was hired by Harpo Productions, Oprah Winfrey's media company, to build a web portal.
"We didn't really know who Oprah was," says Andrey Kanonirov, Axmor's IBM project manager. "But we know who she is now."
Our team's project to develop a Mash-Uptoolkit that can reliably access enterprise data offers a demo of its usefulness with Yahoo Pipes. Can be found on IBM's AlphaWorks site at: http://services.alphaworks.ibm.com/qedwiki/
Just found out Kapow Technologies will be doing a session here atmashup camp. I'm quite jazzed by their technology. They do dataextraction from web sites that can then be returned via an Atom or RSSfeed. Once in that form, that data is easily used in situational appsoftware such as QEDWiki. They do really good stuff. You can checkout a free version of their latest release at OpenKapow.com.