XI52 220.127.116.11 Firmware, Weblogic back-end
This should be easy, but for some strange reason, we cannot seem to use a Load Balancer Group as a back end for an MPG.
Say our LBG has 2 members and is named MY_LBG. The members' are defined by IP, and the mapped server port is set to 0. We set the static back end in the MPG to "http://MY_LBG:8011", and BOTH servers are listening on port 8011. In this setup, it says it fails to make the back-side connection. So, I thought I had the port setup backwards, and changed the mapped server port on each member to 8011, and changed the static back end in the MPG to "http://MY_LBG". Again, it says it fails to make the back-side connection.
If I set the static back end to any of the members directly, like "http://IP_OF_MEMBER_1:8011" or "http://IP_OF_MEMBER_2:8011", it works just fine.
So, I'm thinking I'm missing a radio button somewhere.
Here's what we have set:
Retrieve Workload Management Information: off
Damp Time: 120
Do Not Pass Down State: off
Try Every Server Before Failing: on
Masquerade as group name: on
HEALTH *** Not enabled
Insertion Cookie Name: DPJSESSIONID
Insertion Path: /
Insertion Domain: .ourcompany.com
Override Websphere Cell Session Affinity: on
Monitored Cookies: JSESSIONID
MEMBERS (2 identically setup except IP address)
Mapped Server Port: 0 (or the actual of 8011, neither worked)
Health Port: 0 ( Health Checking is off right now )
NOTICE: developerWorks Community will be offline May 29-30, 2015 while we upgrade to the latest version of IBM Connections. For more information, read our upgrade FAQ.
This topic has been locked.
2 replies Latest Post - 2013-02-25T20:52:09Z by SystemAdmin
Pinned topic Need Help with Load Balancer Group as MPG Backend
Answered question This question has been answered.
Unanswered question This question has not been answered yet.
Updated on 2013-02-25T20:52:09Z at 2013-02-25T20:52:09Z by SystemAdmin
msiebler 2700005RPQ140 Posts
SystemAdmin 110000D4XK6772 PostsACCEPTED ANSWER
Re: Need Help with Load Balancer Group as MPG Backend2013-02-25T20:52:09Z in response to msieblerYes... we did.
We did solve it, but didn't "solve" anything, in the sense of understanding it.
We dropped the LBG and re-built it. It is working now. In my haste to rebuild it, I gave the new one a really short name. The first one had a pretty long name, like 25 to 30 characters.
The one that is now working is 8 characters long.
Is there anything in anyone's experience where the length of the name of a load balancer group affected its working state?