Is there anyway to cluster two impact servers so that Primary connects to object server, gets events and based on ip address of event, hands the impact processing off to secondary impact server.
We have nodes in a different geographic region that are not routable from our main impact server, but would be from a secondary. Basically, if event from Region A, Impact in Region A will process, if Region B, Region B impact would process.
Re: Cluster Scenario2013-01-17T15:46:12ZThis is the accepted answer. This is the accepted answer.
- SystemAdmin 110000D4XK
I have a network in California. On that network I have a probe that communicates with my object server in TX over a vpn connection. The California probe has an interface on the CA network and collects traps, syslogs, etc from the devices in CA and sends the events to my object server in TX over the vpn connection. My impact server resides in TX and cannot access the devices in CA. We have policies that use the snmp dsa and those policies would be unable to poll the devices in CA due to the complexities of the network.
What I would like to do is have a separate impact server installed in CA that can reach these networks. When events come in from CA, the CA impact server would run the policies and update the object server, when they come in from TX, the TX impact server would run the polices and update the object server.
sunjit 270001GG1W138 Posts
Re: Cluster Scenario2013-01-17T16:53:21ZThis is the accepted answer. This is the accepted answer.
- deltabravo 270000WMS1