My JAX-WS web service client is running on WAS 126.96.36.199 server.
The web service response contains WS-Addressing headers <wsa:MessageID> and <wsa:ReplyTo>
Is there a way I can configure my web service client to ignore WS-Addressing headers?
I tried the settings AddressingFeature, SubmissionAddressingFeature specified in the below url but my web service client still processes the WS-Addressing headers.
The issue I've is: The JAX-WS Webservice Client (which is using WAS 7.0 runtime) is trying to process the headers present in the response and reporting that its missing one of the required WS-Addressing header. As per the WAS runtime code http://com.ibm.jaxws.thinclient_7.0.0.jar the required header is <wsa:action>.
Pinned topic How to ignore WS-Addressing headers in Webservice response - JAX-WS Client
Answered question This question has been answered.
Unanswered question This question has not been answered yet.
Updated on 2012-11-28T16:57:18Z at 2012-11-28T16:57:18Z by SystemAdmin
sutter 120000EB4G17 Posts
Re: How to ignore WS-Addressing headers in Webservice response - JAX-WS Client2012-11-28T16:45:53ZThis is the accepted answer. This is the accepted answer.Hi shashir,
This forum is used to post questions relating to OSGi and JPA 2.0 Feature Pack. I don't believe there are any listeners that can you address your WS-Addressing header questions. I would suggest posting your question to the general WebSphere Application Server forum as a start:
Or, if you are using Web Services within Process Server, here's another forum that might help:
Or, maybe you should open a PMR to get formal support for your question.
Kevin Sutter, JPA Architect, IBM WebSphere
SystemAdmin 110000D4XK153 Posts
Re: How to ignore WS-Addressing headers in Webservice response - JAX-WS Client2012-11-28T16:57:18ZThis is the accepted answer. This is the accepted answer.
- sutter 120000EB4G
Thank you, I just realized that I posted this in a wrong forum by mistake. Thank you for your instructions. I posted this in WebSphere Application Server forums.
I'm marking this post as answered. Please let me know if there is anything else I'm supposed to do to make this post void in this forum.