I have a trial SCE account where I created an instance of the service SCAS Beta 5.
With this trial account, I can only use 5 ips ( 4 if I take away the one used by SCAS ). The pattern I am trying to deploy uses more than 4 ips so I tried to set the IP Groups in SCAS to use a different SCE account where I have access to more ips.
Although I can set the the IP Group in the UI to the other account ( it validates the user/pwd and key ), when I try to deploy I get an exception that the vm's cannot be registered. Is this a bug or am I trying an unsupported scenario ?
NOTICE: developerWorks Community will be offline May 29-30, 2015 while we upgrade to the latest version of IBM Connections. For more information, read our upgrade FAQ.
This topic has been locked.
2 replies Latest Post - 2012-10-10T13:28:56Z by ValentinaBirsan
Pinned topic SCAS Beta 5 - cannot deploy to another SCE account
Answered question This question has been answered.
Unanswered question This question has not been answered yet.
Updated on 2012-10-10T13:28:56Z at 2012-10-10T13:28:56Z by ValentinaBirsan
morganri 270005AQCE109 PostsACCEPTED ANSWER
Re: SCAS Beta 5 - cannot deploy to another SCE account2012-10-10T12:31:22Z in response to ValentinaBirsanValentina,
If I understand what you are attempting, it isn't allowed.
You were probably sharing your SSH public key between SCE accounts. - Beta 5 will not allow this action.
ValentinaBirsan 120000EY7R5 PostsACCEPTED ANSWER
Re: SCAS Beta 5 - cannot deploy to another SCE account2012-10-10T13:28:56Z in response to morganriHi Rich
No, I don't share the ssh key between accounts. I have one key for my test account ( where the SCAS service is running ) and another key for the payed for account.
What I do : when I setup SCAS I am asked to enter the Cloud Groups ( Cloud > Cloud Groups ). Instead of setting my test account info ( testAccountId, pwd, testAccountKey ) I enter my payed for account ( payedForAccountId, pwd, PayedForAccountKey )
The UI seems to allow that, my account info is properly validated, and this made me assume that the scenario is supported.