I am using IBM SmartCloud Application Workload Services as following configuration:
Data Center: Raleigh, USA
Service: IBM SCAWS v1.0 Beta3
Service ID: 2615
Storage ID: N/A
Server ID: 252514
Server IP: (I can tell you, if needed)
Now I can sign-in to IWD, and created some script-packages and configured pattern.
But when I add "DB2 Express-C" virtual image into my pattern, I can't avoid warning message "At least one part in the pattern is not defined by the selected virtual image.".
I can't deploy this pattern as instances. Because "deploy" icon can't be active, maybe because of this warning, I guess.
I embedded screenshot image(scaws_error.png) of that warning message.
Do I miss any process before using this DB2 Express-C virtual image?
Are there any way to avoid it?
Or can't we use this DB2 Express-C image in this environment yet?
Thanks for advance. Regards.
Notice: We have upgraded developerWorks Community to the latest version of IBM Connections. For more information, read our upgrade FAQ.
Pinned topic Can we use DB2 Express-C image for VSP?
Answered question This question has been answered.
Unanswered question This question has not been answered yet.
Updated on 2012-06-28T23:48:15Z at 2012-06-28T23:48:15Z by pi314
Re: Can we use DB2 Express-C image for VSP?2012-06-28T15:42:01ZThis is the accepted answer. This is the accepted answer.Pi314,
Can you detail all your steps to this point, or would you prefer a Lotus Live session (at no charge) where I can watch you build it?
Re: Can we use DB2 Express-C image for VSP?2012-06-28T20:16:10ZThis is the accepted answer. This is the accepted answer.Hi,
Just a follow-up. We tried the patterns and it is working, can we get a copy of your scripts?
BTW, weI had configured the Cloud Group already and it deployed using the defaults.
Please let us know if you found something on your own.
pi314 110000D7UT13 Posts
Re: Can we use DB2 Express-C image for VSP?2012-06-28T23:48:15ZThis is the accepted answer. This is the accepted answer.
- morganri 270005AQCE
When I tried to reproduce this problem again, I don't see any warning message this time...
I don't understand why, but it seems fine and to be worked as expected.
I will mark this question as resolved. Thanks.