Topic
2 replies Latest Post - ‏2011-05-08T11:29:49Z by SystemAdmin
SystemAdmin
SystemAdmin
7 Posts
ACCEPTED ANSWER

Pinned topic Explorer SDK does not install into Explorer

‏2011-05-05T13:43:12Z |
Hello everybody
I am trying to install the SDK into Explorer.
IBM CICS Explorer SDK 1.0.1.1_201103311702
into Beta April 2011 build id: 201103311702
It fails with the following message:
Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not be found.
Software being installed: IBM CICS Explorer SDK 1.0.1.1_201103311702 (com.ibm.cics.explorer.sdk.feature.feature.group 1.0.1.1_201103311702)
Missing requirement: CICS Java SDK Plug-in 1.0.100.201103311702 (com.ibm.cics.explorer.sdk 1.0.100.201103311702) requires 'bundle org.eclipse.pde.core 0.0.0' but it could not be found
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: IBM CICS Explorer SDK 1.0.1.1_201103311702 (com.ibm.cics.explorer.sdk.feature.feature.group 1.0.1.1_201103311702)
To: com.ibm.cics.explorer.sdk http://1.0.100.201103311702

Are there any known incompatibilities? A fresh installation or starting with -clean did not help.
Thanks,
Isabel
Updated on 2011-05-08T11:29:49Z at 2011-05-08T11:29:49Z by SystemAdmin
  • davidknibb
    davidknibb
    29 Posts
    ACCEPTED ANSWER

    Re: Explorer SDK does not install into Explorer

    ‏2011-05-05T13:58:39Z  in response to SystemAdmin
    Hi Isabel,

    The CICS Explorer SDK provides all functions of the Explorer, and is for installation into Eclipse (or Eclipse based products). The Explorer SDK is not designed to install into the CICS Explorer.

    If you only require the functions of the Explorer, then you can just use the standalone Explorer product.
    If you also require development features, or prefer to use your existing Eclipse environment, you can install the Explorer SDK into an Eclipse IDE instead.

    Hope that clears this up for you!
    Cheers, David
    • SystemAdmin
      SystemAdmin
      7 Posts
      ACCEPTED ANSWER

      Re: Explorer SDK does not install into Explorer

      ‏2011-05-08T11:29:49Z  in response to davidknibb
      Thanks, David,
      I should have read that in the instructions.
      Sorry,
      Isabel