If you want an educational demo of our network design solution using our LogicNet Plus XE product, check our video on YouTube.
The video gives you an introduction to the concepts of network design and takes you through a case study. The focus of this video is on traditional network design-- locating the optimal number, location, size, and territories of warehouses.
IBM recently came out with its annual "Next Five in Five" report highlighting five innovation predictions for the next five years. One article that picked up the story pointed out:
IBM, the world's largest provider of computer services, is one of the
few big corporations investing in long-range research projects and
invested $5.8 billion in research and development last year, accounting
for 6.1% of revenue, according to the company's financials.
This investment in research helps benefit our supply chain clients. For example, IBM recently came out with a new study and white paper, "New Rules for a New Decade: A Vision for Smarter Supply Chain Management." SupplyChainDigest picked up the story and provides a nice summary in addition to the IBM material. The study found that supply chain visionaries have significantly better financial returns by more quickly predicting demand and optimizing and analyzing their supply chain to take advantage of this in closer to real-time. The chart below summarizes the key capabilities of different types of supply chain organization. Of course, there are significant advantages to getting your supply chain to the "Planners" level.
It is increasingly important to have the analytics
that enable better decision-making, says Douglass. But an area where
supply chain managers need to improve is scenario planning— assessing
different alternatives based on risks.
“It’s like having different playbooks with different response profiles for different contingencies,” Douglass explains.
Overall, IBM is investing heavily in supply chain thought leadership to help our clients run better supply chains.
We've recently written an educational book on network design. This book is aimed at both those who do network design projects for a living and for use in the classroom.
For those who do these studies, you will develop better intuition on how these models are solved and new ideas for modeling your supply chain. It can also be a good guide for people who are new to the discipline within your organization.
For those of you who teach, this book will introduce your students to the topic and provide them with a wide ranges of realistically sized models to work on. You can use with the IBM ILOG LogicNet Plus XE software from the academic initiative to allow your students to learn the topic with the use of commercial software.
Last week, IBM hosted another Connect to Win event for business partners at it's northern California IBM Innovation Center. The event focused on business analytics and featured IBM Distinguished Engineer Jeff Jonas, a dynamic and highly sought after speaker. Among his many accomplishments, he is known for developing the technology used by the Las Vegas gaming industry featured in the book "Bringing Down the House", the recent movie "21", and numerous documentaries on the Discovery Channel, Learning Channel and the Travel Channel.
Following the keynote by Jeff Jonas, IBM hosted a panel discussion. Some 30+ partners came to learn how to leverage analytics in their offerings, and naturally a wide spectrum of analytics sophistication was represented, generating a vibrant discussion on everything from Smarter Planet to Artificial Intelligence to Decision Management.
The panel was made up of:
Jeff Jonas, IBM Distinguished Engineer, Chief Scientist, IBM Entity Analytics Group
Jeff Kreulen, Senior Manager, Senior Technical Staff Member, Services Oriented Technologies, IBM Almaden Research Center
Thomas Dong, Senior Product Marketing Manager, ILOG Optimization and Analytical Decision Support Solutions
Daniel Mannisto, CEO, Applied Analytix (IBM Business Partner)
During the panel discussion I had the opportunity to first share IBM's vision for business analytics, using an adaptation from Tom Davenport's book "Competing on Analytics", to explain why, how and where IBM has invested $14B since 2005 in business analytics. Several partners thanked me afterwards for presenting this visual, as it provided them with a blueprint for how they might evolve their own analytics capabilities.
In fact, this gave me an opportunity to define a new software category for many - Advanced Analytics, which applies statistical and mathematical techniques to provide forward-looking capabilities, beyond the insight commonly extracted from historical data and information. It can be viewed as a subset of Business Analytics, and provides an interesting convergence opportunity, between the IT-based "analytics" world, and this emerging world previously reserved for specialists in statistics and Operations Research-related disciplines (Management Science, Industrial Engineering, Financial Engineering, Systems Engineering, Applied Mathematics, etc.). As the business world evolves its analytics agenda beyond business intelligence and performance management capabilities, the desire to not only look back in time, but forward in time as well, is driving awareness for Advanced Analytics - and creating many opportunities for SPSS and ILOG Optimization at the point of business impact.
To learn more about Advanced Analytics for a Smarter Planet, start here:
If you’ve paid much
attention lately, the topic of “smart supply chains” is currently in vogue. But what is a smart
supply chain, exactly? And are you trying to build one at your
company?The idea of smart or
intelligent supply chains has been around for some time – more on that in just a
bit. However, part (but by no means all) of the recent reanimated discussion
about smart supply chains has come from the efforts of IBM, which has made
“smarter” supply chains one of its key marketing messages.
report IBM released last year summarizing surveys and interviews with hundreds
of senior supply chain executives (promoted in many venues since then, including
SCDigest), IBM said that “To deal effectively with risk and meet your business
objectives, we believe supply chains must become a lot smarter,” and called on
Chief Supply Chain Officers to start building to that new vision right
now. Read the full story online at SCDigest.com.
Gartner RAS Core Research Note G00172071, Andrew White, 17 November 2009
"This research updates users on IBM’s overall supply chain management (SCM) product strategy, which has matured in terms of positioning and product management/strategy since its most recent Ilog acquisition in 2008. We highlight the finalized IBM SCM product portfolio, and highlight how this rationalized portfolio aligns with the SCM trends IBM exposed in its most recent Executive Survey, which also aligns closely with Gartner’s research."
To read the note visit: http://imagesrv.gartner.com/media-products/pdf/reprints/ibm/external/volume4/article31.pdf
1. You can find savings with network modeling. The team quoted that they were able to find $10M in savings just in the initial modeling. In fact, the speakers stressed the tremendous value in just building a baseline model. This allows you to uncover savings, but to also challenge preconceived ideas.
2. Sensitivity analysis is valuable. After narrowing down choices, the team did analysis on the impact of higher oil prices and carbon emissions to rank the solutions.
Bob Ferrari noted that this work can be done with remote teams:
The combined project team performed this task over three months on a
virtual basis, without the need to meet face-to-face until just before
final recommendations. This was an important reinforcement that a
virtual team process can work, with selection of both the right
players, and a single point-of-contact for each constituency.
The speakers also mentioned that through the years they were able to build various models that focused on different parts of their supply chain from distribution to manufacturing.
Correctly positioning and buffering inventory can help you create a more flexible supply chain with lower costs.
In the military, it is common practice to pay suppliers on a "cost plus" basis. Effectively, this makes all the suppliers a "make to order" location. That is, the suppliers can only make product when there is a firm order. There is no mechanism for the supplier to make product in advance, sit on safety stock, and provide faster service.
Keeping helicopters flying is not trivial. They are made up of many parts and operated in tough conditions. Many of the key parts(drive shafts, sycn shafts, blades) require many sub-components and must be made with specialized materials in a high-precision manufacturing environment.
The supply chain for these key parts can be very long (measured in many months), and it is expensive to keep enough of these items around as spare parts.
With the current system, each key part had to either be stored in inventory as safety stock (waiting to be needed) or the the military had to wait for the supply chain to produce another (creating a backlog of demand and a helicopter that was grounded). Neither alternative was great.
A better solution is to optimize the placement of strategic buffers in this supply chain. The chart below on the left shows the existing supply chain. The yellow box on the right represents the customer (the military) and a key part. The gray boxes to the left represent all the steps in the supply chain needed to make this particular part. You can see the complexity of the supply chain. In the baseline, the entire buffer is held by military, represented by the red bar.
In the optimal case, the suppliers hold buffers. These buffers are seen by the red bars. The inventory optimization identifies where and how big these buffers should be. Now, the military can keep the helicopters flying with much less money tied up in working capital (or worse, with many helicopters not being able to fly).
Of course, implementing this solution is not trivial. Contracts with the suppliers have to be re-worked to allow them to create and maintain the safety stock buffers.
In 2008, after undergoing a grueling third-party logistics provider
(3PL) selection process, Navistar chose San Mateo, Calif.-based Menlo
Worldwide Logistics, the global supply chain management subsidiary of
Con-way Inc., to support it in improving its global logistics network,
including managing global transportation providers and regional
warehouses, planning lead times, and modeling net landed costs.
He reports that one of their goals was a 25% reduction in supply chain costs. He reports that at "the end of the partnership’s second year, we will have achieved
11-percent cost savings, out of the 25-percent goal we set for the next
When discussing the reasons Navistar selected Menlo, he mentioned their "global coverage, cross-network planning, and optimization capabilities."
This is a very interesting article discussing the challenges of building a new global supply chain from the ground up. It is also interesting that modeling net landed cost and optimization capabilities were mentioned as key factors in the transformation of the supply chain. This mirrors some other findings that leading supply chains are relying on optimization-based technology to help drive improvements.