dmmckinn 1200006SCS Visits (152)
Looking for guidance in planning your deployment?
The Deployment planning: Where to start? article in the Jazz.net deployment wiki outlines several key planning and design considerations for designing a Rational development environment. The considerations focus on the environment and non-functional options that typically effect how successful your deployment and ultimate adoption will be.
Topics covered in the article include the following:
Kiran Byrappa 270001YMWT Visits (344)
You may come across situation where you do not want a user in your Project Area to view data in a particular stream.
dmmckinn 1200006SCS Visits (358)
Looking for some of those special little tidbits to help with your use of Rational Integration Tester? Check out the following most recently published content which may offer some assistance.
This document will be helpful to users who have constructed a Custom Function previously for RIT and may wish to repeat the process without working through all the instructions in the manual again. The document may also assist users reviewing the process undertaken when troubleshooting.
Provides details about how you can pretty print XML from IBM Rational Integration Tester that may be desirable in cases such as logging.
Arun K Sriramaiah 2700076GE8 Visits (398)
This article explains how to reduce the number of Rational Team Concert component flow displays in the pending changes window.
By default, all components in a Repository workspace (RWS) use the current flow target. You can use the Repository workspace editor to add flow targets or change their scope so that not all components use them. Refer to Flow targets for further details.
For example, you can specify in flow targets for some of the components in a Repository workspace (RWS) display, or decide that a specific component must display in pending changes window.
Note: You can use the Flow Only components checked below option in RWS\Stream Flow Target to make the Pending Changes view more manageable. This helps more when streams or workspace have 10++ and which might not be all needed in the pending changes window.
You can use the above scenario where in you can avoid unwanted components display in the pending changes.
Arun K Sriramaiah 2700076GE8 Visits (382)
Here is a collection of some of the Basic Rational Team Concert Source code management links from IBM Rational Support. We hope you will find them as helpful as we have.
RTC Source Control Basics
Rajeshavanthi 2700022MCX Visits (432)
There are various performance testing tools in market and it's advisable for a tester to do a sort of comparison in-terms of the product functionality.
Under Load Runner you could see following options made available
So there could be questions as to whether RPT provides similar functionality or how would the virtual user execution gets handled in RPT.
What happens if you specify 100 virtual users in the RPT schedule. Say, you have 10 user groups each one has an unique script with it. So10 users per user group, totally 100.
RPT does not require a thread per test not it does require a thread per virtual user. When an individual action is being executed one thread is used.
One example of an action is an HTTP request. One thread is required to open a connection, if necessary, and write the request. Reading the response from the server is non-blocking. When data is available one thread is required to read the data and perform any processing required. Another example of an action is Custom Code. During the execution of the Custom Code exec() method one thread is required.
In general, For the HTTP protocol the RPT engine will create a thread as needed up to a maximum of 500 threads. The need to execute an action (eg request send or response) and unavailability of a free thread is what controls creation of additional threads.
Unless there is some specific problem it is highly recommended to let RPT control the creation and deletion of threads.
So, if you are looking it specifically from RPT perspective, then the agent starts execution with 10 worker threads
However if you are interested to control the threads, then the following system properties can influence thread control. These apply to the execution engine (ie location or agent) so a general property for the location must be created to set these system properties. For each location you must create a property called RPT_VMARGS and set it accordingly.
The default values are
-DrptThreadCount=10 (Initial number of worker threads)
RohitBalduwa 2700066W8H Visits (445)
The external help desk is the way Service Desk integrates with Rational Team Concert. When Service Desk users publish an incident to this external help desk, the integration creates a work item in a Rational Team Concert project area.
Note: ClearQuest was the first Rational Configuration Management tool supported by the Rational Connector. When support for Rational Team Concert was added, SAP did not update the SPRO documentation. This will be corrected in a future release of Solution Manager.
RohitBalduwa 2700066W8H Visits (374)
The logical port specifies the server on which IBM Rational SAP Connector is installed. It is used to transfer data to the external Defect Management Tool. The Web AS HTTP or HTTPS port is used, depending on the information in the URL.
Each logical port is attached to a consumer proxy. These ports are used by Solution Manager and Service Desk when they need to call the Rational Connector.
Steps to setup the logical ports:
dmmckinn 1200006SCS Visits (372)
If you are looking for some help in getting started with integrations supported in the CLM and SSE solutions, you may want to check this article: Integration: Where to start?.
The Integration topics in the article (and in related sections) are intended to provide information about integrations supported in the Collaborative Lifecycle Management and Systems and Software Engineering solutions in terms of technology, maturity, and ability to support some high priority usage scenarios. It will focus initially on the ALM Core solution set of products, ensuring that the integrations are accurately and completely documented and validated for the scenarios identified. The focus will grow over time to include integrations with other IBM tools in the context of, and with third-party tools that have been identified as high priority by customers.
It starts with a description of ALM Core and continues on from there:
RohitBalduwa 2700066W8H Visits (386)
More on the CLM SAP integration...
Create an initial identity for web services calls before the Rational Connector can exchange data with Solution Manager and Service Desk. This user is completely internal to the SAP Solution Manager configuration.
References:Setting up the Rational Connector to work with the SAP Solution Manager
RohitBalduwa 2700066W8H Visits (464)
More on the CLM SAP integration...
A self-signed certificate is to be provided by the SAP Solution Manager and imported into the IBM Rational SAP Connector so that a trust relationship is established.
Steps to configure Client Side for SAML authentication:
RohitBalduwa 2700066W8H Visits (489)
Here are some additional details about the CLM SAP integration. There will be more related topics coming your way - stay tuned...
Solution Manager system documents are displayed by link in the external test management tool. You must activate a service to make this possible.
The service allows following the OSLC “Specified Link” from a Rational Requirements Composer requirement to a Solution Manager blueprint requirement document.
This section uses the External Test Management with IBM Rational Quality Manager > Activate Service to Display Solution Manager Documents.
RohitBalduwa 2700066W8H Visits (493)
SAML is the authentication mechanism that is required for the exchange of data between SAP and the Rational Connector. It’s like two people exchanging keys to each other’s houses. Without the address of the other person’s house, the key can’t be used.
Steps to configure the Server Side for SAML authentication:
dmmckinn 1200006SCS Visits (615)
In continuing on the topic of Performance testing, Vaughn Rokosz takes a look at some of the common reasons performance tests can fail, and suggests ways of tuning your servers to avoid the common issues.
Take a look at his latest article that includes the following:
For your convenience, here is the link to the previous article on the subject: Creating a perf
dmmckinn 1200006SCS Visits (488)
Looking for information about how to build performance simulations?
Building a good simulation of a user population requires expertise at many levels, including:
In the following article Vaughn Rokosz, a technical lead for the CLM performance team, shares some of his experiences with building performance simulations of the Jazz products. He walks through a simple example demonstrating how to build a simulation of a user population that is creating work items in Rational Team Concert. He also shares some of the things used to make the development of performance simulations simpler by attaching the Rational Performance Tester project that he used when working through the example.
Stay tuned for part 2...
dmmckinn 1200006SCS Visits (544)
A new article “Rational Team Concert essentials: A developer's perspective: Part 2. Delivering Work Contributions” has been published. It is a continuation of the conversation started in the Part 1 article published earlier this year.
This article series describes many operations a developer is responsible for from the time they join the project to the time where they are ready to deliver their features and fixes. This series is meant to be a helpful collection of "developer's cheat sheets."
A developer's perspective: Part 1. Joining a new team project Explore the main concepts behind Rational Team Concert's change management mechanisms, joining a team project, creating a repository workspace and loading your project components and artifacts. In Part 1 of this series, you will learn how, step-by-step, to join a team project, create a workspace to contribute to your project, and load existing artifacts from your team’s project components.
A developer's perspective: Part 2. Delivering Work Contributions Learn how to use Rational Team Concert to identify your project development commitments, carry out your development activities in a team environment, and deliver your work to your team project.
GRUC Webcast on August 13: IBM Static Analyzer – Taking your Application Security Analysis to the Cloud
JackSchneiderCO 270007HB0G Visits (562)
Chat with us live during the webcast! Join the CrowdChat to interact and network with fellow webcast attendees!
In this session we will introduce IBM Static Analyzer (now in beta) and show how it greatly simplifies static analysis (or white box) security scanning. We will discuss and demonstrate how it can easily integrate into the development lifecycle, as well as how it uses advanced analytics to produce targeted/actionable results to enable you to remediate security vulnerabilities.
***Dial in codes will be sent a few minutes before the webcast and posted in the online meeting. Please check your email before 12:00 PM ET (sender is
By registering for this webcast you are allowing the GRUC to provide your information to IBM and/or webcast sponsors for direct contact regarding IBM products and promotions. You will also receive a complimentary membership to the Global Rational User Community.
SunilKumarR 270001XXSY Visits (678)
If you are looking for a simple tool to perform GET operation(s) on IBM Rational Quality Manager (RQM), then you are looking at the right post.
The RQM artifacts are exposed in XML format through the RQM's Reportable REST (REpresentation and State Transfer) API's. If you are in need to perform a quick GET (get XML) of the RQM artifacts without having to worry about the REST syntax and other nitty-gritties, then the "RQM GET" utility is a good option. This utility is built on the basis of the RQMUrlUtility and provides an interactive way to download the artifact XML using the artifact web IDs.
RQMGET requires a Java 6 (1.6) or greater.
-password : Login Password
-url : Https Url for the RQM application
Here is a sample command line trace of events on the RQM GET utility used to download artifact from an RQM server.
C:\>java -jar rqmget.jar -user clmadmin -password clmadmin -url http
You can download the RQM GET utility by clicking on RQMGETUtility.zip.
Check out these newly published videos for IBM Rational Performance Tester.
Rajeshavanthi 2700022MCX Visits (551)
You could see the 'Additional delay' under Client processing delay section for each request, under Advanced tab.
What happens if you make this delay to zero??
Does the play back show much difference in overall response time?
Generally, the time taken to load the entire page outside IBM Rational Performance Tester (RPT) cannot be mapped to the time taken to load the same page when invoked via RPT recorder. There are lot of parameters that RPT, as a load performance testing tool, accounts for (such as the traffic and connection information).
Also, RPT processes these Client side delays in parallel or sequentially depending on how the application server returns them. Sometimes if you try modifying/disabling the client processing delay value, it may also disable the immediate transaction under Rational Performance Tester. Because, practically speaking, when you disable a request, you potentially invalidate some delays because in theory the disabled request could have been the basis for a delay. Therefore, RPT automatically recalculates the delays on the page when you disable a request. That is, if a later request used the disabled one as a base, the later delay request should be adjusted.
Now, let's come to your question about why such discrepancy between the response in the browser and RPT...
Often times when you see response times that are inaccurate it is because of recording your actions too fast and so you end up with more than one page being combined together. When recording, you need to be mindful and make sure to pause between mouse clicks. Do an action and wait 5 seconds before continuing on to the next action. You also need to pay attention to where your mouse is and make sure you have no "hover gifs" that you accidentally cause to be sent to the server while recording.
To see if you have these problems you have two things you can look at.
1. Open the test and click on the name of the test under test Contents in the tree. Click Select->Request. On the right hand side you will see a table of all requests in your test. Look at the delay column and look for really large delay values. If you have these, they are usually caused by recording too quickly, and act as an "embedded" think on the page. The Client Delay is supposed to simulate how long your client took to process the data from the server before sending the next piece of data. When you record too quickly, these values can be skewed. You can also go to a specific page that is taking too long and look at those specific requests. You can use the same Select button, or you can go to the Advanced tab of each request and look at its delay.
2. If you find the delays are your problem, then you can split the page where the delays are long since this was probably supposed to be two pages. This will move that delay to be the think time of the page which would be more accurate. You can also go to Wind
Also remember that when doing recording, we will capture each connection that was used and will send out the requests on the same connection that they were sent on originally. If you had two connections sending requests at record time, we will send requests on two connections at execution time. If you see a really long client delay, then look at that request in detail to determine if it was something that was sent by a user gesture or as a result of the primary request.