Arun K Sriramaiah 2700076GE8 Visits (361)
Rational Team Concert server is expected to have a common user base management. In order to correctly perform process enforcement for Git operations by Rational Team Concert it is imperative that the identity of the Git user be known to Rational Team Concert. Therefore, the need to have a common user base across Rational Team Concert and Git server (Apache HTTP server) via a different LDAP arrangement.
We can still get the integration done using a common user name with different user base across Rational Team Concert and Git server via an different LDAP arrangement.
Example: Git is configured with Apache DS LDAP and RTC configured with different LDAP registry.
Note: Common user id used for both GIT and RTC using different registry (with different password) and provide all necessary permissions.
Below are checkpoints for verifying the integrations:
1) Verify the GIT login, just to ensure GIT login is fine
$ git remote show origin
2) Verify the GIT GIt repo configuration
Update respective "repokey" and "repourl" information
3) Verify the GIT GIt repo configuration
Update respective "pre-receive" and "post-receive" hooks information
Note: The above configuration will give a clear understanding about RTC-GIT integrations and using a common user name with different user base across Rational Team Concert and Git server via different LDAP arrangements.
Kiran Byrappa 270001YMWT Visits (339)
Post upgrade of your CLM application you may come across the below error while trying to access any Project Areas in Rational Quality Manager.
The error occurs when QM is not deployed correctly which could be the result of an incomplete / improper upgrade process and when WebSphere cache was not cleaned prior to deploying 5.0.2 war file.
Checking the logs reveals the below error:
You may follow the below steps to redeploy QM:
3. Re-deploy QM.war
4. Redo the group mapping in WebSphere by following the below steps:
Map security roles to a user or repository group:
a) Go to Applications > Application Types > WebSphere enterprise applications.
e) Enter a search string to return your group names from the LDAP server. Click Search to run the query.
Kiran Byrappa 270001YMWT Visits (452)
Post upgrade of CLM your attempt to login to Rational Quality Manager instance displays an error indicating that your server appears to be in bad state.
You may want to check the following to ensure that the required services are setup properly and are up and running.
naomimg 060001F9C7 Visits (424)
As we (Naomi Guerrero and Denise McKinnon) assume ownership responsibility for this blog from our esteemed colleague Jason (acdntlpoet: http
To the faithful followers of this blog, we promise to continue to provide you with the meaningful content and posts that help you to be successful. We want to encourage open collaboration with our followers and appreciate new ideas about topics you want to know more about. Find out a little bit more about us below!
Joined Rational support back in 2000, holds a BA in Information Systems and has over 35 years experience in IT (for those who remember programming on Punch Cards). I've held various positions as a Technical Support Engineer, Knowledge Engineer and most recently as a Social Business Analyst where I am most excited to be delivering support messages through this blog.
About Naomi :
Joined Rational Support in 2006 as a Software Engineer. I have nearly 15 years experience in IT and hold a Computer Science degree. In August, I will begin pursing an MBA advance degree. I am currently a Social Business Analyst for a subset of products within IBM.
We look forward to collaborating with you!
dmmckinn 1200006SCS Visits (369)
New video published to the IBM
Kiran Byrappa 270001YMWT Visits (427)
This article discusses how you can identify the "Actual Start and End Dates" in Rational Quality Manager.
There will be instances where a testing effort would be delayed and one needs to capture the actual date it started as apposed to the planned date it was supposed to be started.
The planned start and end dates are inherited from the dates in the timeline, as are the actual dates that are shown in brackets next to the iteration name.
The following steps lists the steps you will need to perform to edit the Actual dates:
1. Navigate to 'Test Plan > Test Schedule'
3. Edit the dates under the Planned Start Date and enter the description as required
Also, the other way is to define the "Custom attributes" in the test plan where you will need to manually enter the Proposed / Actual Start / End dates.
When you are defining the custom attributes you may mark the 'Planned/Proposed Start and End Dates" as "Required" so that one cannot save the test plan without specifying the planned dates.
While creating the test plan this should look like below:
You can use the "Browse Test Plans" and compare the 'Actual Start / End Dates' Vs 'Planned / Proposed Start / END Dates".
vjagadeesh 2700063KJN Visits (373)
Rational Performance Tester supports the TN3270 protocol. However, the TN5250 protocol is still undergoing testing.
The recording of the application using TN5250 protocol is possible using the Socket protocol, as there is no specific protocol recorder provided for this. Identifying and debugging issues which arise during a re-run of the recorded test is difficult using the Socket protocol. Although it is not advisable to use the Socket protocol; there is no other option currently available to use Rational Performance Tester with applications using the TN5250 protocol.
vjagadeesh 2700063KJN Visits (616)
Correlation of cookies is not mandatory in RPT. During playback some values which are recorded during scripting are sent to the server to be processed, but these values most of the time are dynamic in nature, and they do not form the page content during response from the server. Cookies are usually cached to be reused by the page, but these do not give the correct response time for the page content. Hence, some times the test is run by disabling the cache. To summarize, no it is not necessary to correlate cookie in RPT, as they do not form the basic contents of the page.
AcdntlPoet 2700019V2G Visits (611)
It is somewhat of a bitter-sweet day for me as I hand off ownership of this blog to a new team of colleagues to take this space and bring it to even higher levels of value. I'm letting go of this blog as part of my transition in to the IBM IoT support organization where I am working on social business strategy and logistics like I did for Rational Support all these years.
As you may have already noted from the about section to the right side here, I am leaving this blog in the very capable hands of Denise McKinnon and Naomi Guerrero. I couldn't be more pleased to leave this institution in their hands, much like Kelly Smith did for me a few years back. Rest assured, you will get the same if not better information and value from this blog moving forward as you did previously.
But now I hear you asking... What IS IBM IoT Support? And THAT, my friends, is a great question!
IBM IoT Support is a team of IBMers who are now part of the new IBM Internet of Things organization supporting the tools makers like you need to build components and connected devices. IBM IoT Support is focused on helping you, the makers, with your product questions by providing content relating to the various products covered by our new division.
Through our focused support of asset management and continuous engineering tools, we are here to provide you with the best support in the industry; to help you be successful with the applications and components to ensure your work on the connected devices in the Internet of Things brings you the right value.
The products we support here include:
There's no change in the way you will obtain support for the products you already own, the only change you'll likely see is the addition of a few new social channels like our blog, our new Twitter account, and our new Youtube channel to help get you the right content at the right time. Our technotes can all be found in their same locations per product, and the process for contacting support to open a Problem Management Request (PMR) remains the same as well. We hope you'll follow us in our new spaces!
Cheers to you all!
AcdntlPoet 2700019V2G Visits (409)
In this article Shanker Prasad Perumal and Syed Attaullah demonstrate how to use the new features in IBM Rational Test Workbench to perform two important aspects of performance testing on mobile apps: Response time measurements and Resource monitoring.
Given the explosive growth of mobile smartphone use and mobile application development, mobile test automation is a key requirement to enable successful and fast delivery of quality mobile applications. Automated functional testing of mobile applications has helped ensure that the desired functionality of the mobile app and the user flow in the application work as expected. However, there is a significant need to move beyond just functional testing of mobile apps. There are numerous performance aspects of those apps that need to be measured and enhanced. There is a direct correlation between a mobile app's performance and the end user experience of the app.
Are you a visual learner? Watch Shanker go through the steps to analyze the performance of a mobile app: