I just read the blogs from Chris Mellor from the Register and Tom Trainer Network Computing and thought how insightful are these two outsiders about the inner workings of IBM.
First off, yes IBM is no longer selling the DCS9900, a DDN OEM rebranded system in the very large IBM storage portfolio. There is no question that this product is no longer available after the October 15 date.
Second, the DCS 3700 is already part of our portfolio and is now an OEM box from Netapp/Engenio/LSI. The density of this system is the same as the DCS 9900 and makes sense to use the DCS 3700 as a replacement for the DCS9900.
Third, Tom’s blog about SONAS being a monolithic NAS storage is very skewed. SONAS is a very flexible in the way we can scale both storage and the throughput with out affecting either variable. Most “scale out” systems you have to scale both in order to keep up with demand. SONAS uses some of the best technology on the market with a huge amount of throughput.
His statement about IBM dropping DDN from SONAS is un-true and goes to show how much research Tom put into writing this blog. I am sure Tom is looking out to write a non-biased blog for Network Computing but maybe those days at HDS are still making a big influence in his ability to look at announcement letter and make a extrapolations about other products.
Finally, If HDS thought BlueArc was so great, why didn’t they buy them back when they could have gotten the company for a better deal? Has the product changed THAT much since 2006? I wish HDS only the best for dealing with the transition and getting that product under the HDS umbrella.
If you do your homework and base your assumptions on facts instead of conjecture, you will find SONAS is a solid platform in the enterprise NAS market. SONAS has proven it can be the market leader with a low cost to performance ratio and will only get better as time goes on.