Its been an interesting week in IT retractions.
Microsoft seriously went off the rails with their Meter Maid Booth Babes on the Gold Coast.
Check out the story here or here.
I mention this story not because I want to embarrass Microsoft (who I don't think quite realised what they had signed up for).
To their credit they quickly apologised and moved to correct their mistake.
Instead I mention this because several Microsoft people were more than willing to (quite rightly) publicly express their opinions on the subject.
I thought this was fantastic.
But with great power comes great responsibility.
As an IBMer I have never been told what I can or cannot blog.
However I do of course follow IBM Business Conduct Guidelines as well as IBM Social Networking Guidelines.
So I have to say that I viewed with dismay HDS blogger Pete Gerrs extraordinary attack on Moshe Yanai and the IBM XIV.
He has since rather gracelessly withdrawn the blog entry but his follow on comments need some response.
The XIV has been (and continues to be) a fantastic product for IBM.
Not only is it a great sales success, it has also allowed us to talk to clients who would not normally purchase IBM storage.
Far from damaging IBMs existing product line, it has resulted in those lines growing stronger (just wait and see).
We have a new focus on usability and simplicity, on making the experience of using and managing storage easier and smarter.
To some part, XIV has brought that focus. I personally think we needed it and that we are stronger for it.
As the year comes to a close you will see the benefits of this reinvigoration with some truly fantastic storage product announcements (across the board).
So while hopefully Pete can take some lessons from his very creditable and measured fellow blogger Hu Yoshida,
I will patiently wait for Barry Burke to post that he was wrong about DS8000.
And I will keep trying to get it right the first time.