13
with Tags:
facility
X
X
Self-Documenting Systems (Actually Coupling Facilities) - One Year On
About a year ago I posted: A Small Step For RMF, A Giant Leap For Self-Documenting Systems .
A year on I've encountered some customer data that's made me go "huh?", related to this.
In the referenced post I mentioned R744FLPN, the Coupling Facility's LPAR Number. For the first time I've seen data where the match - with SMF 70 Logical Partition Number (in Logical Partition Section)... [More]
|
A Small Step For RMF, A Giant Leap For Self-Documenting Systems
I mentioned APAR OA21140 before - here . It's quite an old APAR and so it will (in all likelihood) be on your systems. I'd like to draw your attention to a subtle 1-byte field in the SMF 74 Subtype 4 (Coupling Facility Activity) record: R744FLPN. It's the partition number for the coupling facility. (If you've seen any one of several of my presentations I'll've talked about this field.) Here's... [More]
|
Minor Good News On Coupling Facility Performance Reporting
In recent releases RMF have put the machine serial number into both SMF Type 74 Subtype 4 (Coupling Facility Activity) and SMF Type 70 Subtype 1 (CPU Activity). Actually we get two fields in each case: Plant Number and Sequence Number, which you can put together as eg "51-12345". Soon we'll get another piece of the jigsaw: Partition Number in 74-4. This is a small change but a nice useful one...... [More]
|
Coupling Facility Subchannel Busy in RMF
In the same meeting with RMF Development as ERBSCAN / ERBSHOW was discussed we talked about Parallel Sysplex instrumentation. (Both XCF and Coupling Facility aspects.) One thing I hadn't noticed is the appearance of Subchannel Busy Percentage as a number in the following three places: In Monitor III In the Spreadsheet Reporter As Overview Condition ("SUBCHBP") I think you can do useful work with... [More]
|
Coupling Facility Structure CPU - An Interesting Test
I'm not sure if anyone's done this before. Certainly I've not seen any results... We're beginning to write up some tests the "A Team" (Alain and Pierre) ran before their return to France. Which provides me with some test data. Fortunately I had a stab at mapping the new fields this data contains. One in particular is Stucture CPU (R744SETM)... So, I got to plotting CPU per request against request... [More]
|
Cache Structure Information
It's fair to say I've written very little in terms of book words these past two days. That's because I've been "doing research" on how the cache structure counters really work. "Doing research" is a euphemism for "finding out how the heck the darned thing works". Which is in itself a positive thing to do - but it does rather get in the way of writing stuff. :-( There is a section in the SMF 74... [More]
|
Coupling Facility Structure CPU Time - Initial Investigations
I had to eat a little bit of humble pie today - because I made an elementary mistake. I'm going to share it with you - to save you making it, too. :-) And I'm very sure I'm not going to make it in a customer situation. (Residencies are great for making mistakes in a safe environment.) :-) In CFLEVEL 15 and z/OS Release 9 RMF you get a new field at the structure level: R744SETM. This is the CPU... [More]
|
A Minor Fact About Lock Structures
Sometimes reading the SMF manual buys you less than you thought. I had completely ignored a nice little field - and the code I inherited to analyse SMF 74 Subtype 4 Coupling Facility data ignored it as well. R744SLEC in the Request Data Section for a structure is described by the text "Lock structure only: lock table entry characteristic". Can you guess what it is? :-) If I told you it was a one... [More]
|
Misunderstood Coupling Facility Commands
I wonder how many of you recognise the terms "READ_COCLASS", "WARM", "RFCOM","WRITE_DATALIST" and "CASTOUT_DATALIST". Granted that in that list are two pairs of terms that I believe to be synonymous, but all five are relatively recent enhancements to Parallel Sysplex infrastructure that have a positive impact on DB2 Data Sharing performance (or at least the management of Performance). As I... [More]
|
