• Share
  • ?
  • Profiles ▼
  • Communities ▼
  • Apps ▼

Blogs

  • My Blogs
  • Public Blogs
  • My Updates

LATEST TRENDS:

  • Log in to participate
Tony Pearson Tony Pearson is a Master Inventor and Senior IT Architect for the IBM Storage product line at the IBM Systems Client Experience Center in Tucson Arizona, and featured contributor to IBM's developerWorks. In 2016, Tony celebrates his 30th year anniversary with IBM Storage. He is author of the Inside System Storage series of books. This blog is for the open exchange of ideas relating to storage and storage networking hardware, software and services.
(Short URL for this blog: ibm.co/Pearson )
Facebook,   Twitter,   LinkedIn,   RSS Feed 

My books are available on Lulu.com! Order your copies today!

Featured Redbooks and Redpapers:

  • IBM System Storage Solutions Handbook
  • IBM Software-Defined Storage Guide
  • IBM Private, Public, and Hybrid Cloud Storage Solutions
  • IBM Spectrum Archive Enterprise Edition V1.2: Installation and Configuration Guide
  • IBM Spectrum Scale and ECM FileNet Content Manager Are a Winning Combination
  • IBM Spectrum Scale in an OpenStack Environment


IT featured blogger BlogWithIntegrity.com HootSuite Certified Professional

Links to other blogs...

  • Accelerate with ATS
  • Alltop - Top Storage Blogs
  • Anthony Vandewerdt
  • Barry Whyte (IBM)
  • Bob Sutor (IBM)
  • Brad Johns Consulting
  • Chris M. Evans
  • Chuck Hollis (Oracle)
  • Corporate Blogs
  • Greg Schulz
  • Hu Yoshida (HDS)
  • Jim Kelly (IBM)
  • Jon Toigo - DrunkenData
  • Kirby Wadsworth (F5)
  • Martin Glasborow
  • Raj Sharma, IBM Storage and Te...
  • Richard Swain (IBM)
  • Roger Leuthy, Storage CH Blog
  • Ron Riffe, "The Line"
  • Seb's SANblog
  • Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat
  • Steve Duplessie (ESG)
  • Storagezilla
  • Technology Blogs
  • Top 10 Storage Blogs
  • VMblog by David Marshall

Archive

  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006

Disclaimer

"The postings on this site solely reflect the personal views of each author and do not necessarily represent the views, positions, strategies or opinions of IBM or IBM management."

(c) Copyright Tony Pearson and IBM Corporation. All postings are written by Tony Pearson unless noted otherwise.

Tony Pearson is employed by IBM. Mentions of IBM Products, solutions or services might be deemed as "paid endorsements" or "celebrity endorsements" by the US Federal Trade Commission.

This blog complies with the IBM Business Conduct Guidelines, IBM Social Computing Guidelines, and IBM Social Brand Governance. This blog is admistered by Tony Pearson and Sarochin Tollette.

Safe Harbor Statement: The information on IBM products is intended to outline IBM's general product direction and it should not be relied on in making a purchasing decision. The information on the new products is for informational purposes only and may not be incorporated into any contract. The information on IBM products is not a commitment, promise, or legal obligation to deliver any material, code, or functionality. The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described for IBM products remains at IBM's sole discretion.

Tony Pearson is a an active participant in local, regional, and industry-specific interests, and does not receive any special payments to mention them on this blog.

Tony Pearson receives part of the revenue proceeds from sales of books he has authored listed in the side panel.

Tony Pearson is not a medical doctor, and this blog does not reference any IBM product or service that is intended for use in the diagnosis, treatment, cure, prevention or monitoring of a disease or medical condition, unless otherwise specified on individual posts.

with Tags: cloud Remove the tag from the selected filter tags X storage Remove the tag from the selected filter tags X
All posts
  • Sort by:
  • Date
  • Title
  • Likes
  • Comments ▼
  • Views

IBM Pulse: Day 1

| | Comments (2) | Visits (13728)
Tom Rauchut, IBM Guest Post: The following post was written by Tom Rauchut, IBM Infrastructure Architect and Advanced Technical Sales Specialist for Tivoli Automation. Tom is at IBM Pulse 2011 for Las Vegas this week, and has offered to send his observations.

The expo opened last night. There are so many fantastic demos and product experts. Las Vegas has a Tivoli buzz on right now.

IMG00233-20110227-1906

I'm working in the Hands On Labs room. Pulse labs kicked off Sunday. The hot topics included Cloud, Storage, Automation, Asset Management, and BigFix (a company IBM [acquired and products will now be called Tivoli Endpoint Manager])

IMG00231-20110227-1134

I'll try to get you a few updates along the way.

technorati tags: IBM, Pulse, #ibmpulse, BigFix, Cloud, Storage, Asset Management, Automation, BigFix



Tags:  automation ibm #ibmpulse storage asset+management cloud bigfix pulse

#ibmtechu Day 4 IBM Storage University - Storage Free-for-All

| | Visits (12246)
2011 IBM System Storage Technical University

Continuing my coverage of the [IBM System Storage Technical University 2011], I participated in the storage free-for-all, which is a long-time tradition, started at SHARE User Group conference, and carried forward to other IT conferences. The free-for-all is a Q&A Panel of experts to allow anyone to ask any question. These are sometimes called "Birds of a Feather" (BOF). Last year, we had two: one focused on Tivoli Storage software, and the second to cover storage hardware. This year, we had two, one for System x called "Ask the eXperts", and one for System Storage called "Storage Free-for-All". This post covers the latter.

(Disclaimer: Do not shoot the messenger! We had a dozen or more experts on the panel, representing System Storage hardware, Tivoli Storage software, and Storage services. I took notes, trying to capture the essence of the questions, and the answers given by the various IBM experts. I have spelled out acronyms and provided links to relevant materials. The answers from individual IBMers may not reflect the official position of IBM management. Where appropriate, my own commentary will be in italics.)
Question: Are there any plans to improve the use of BRMS [Backup Recovery and Media Services for IBM i] with [Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM)]?
Answer: It should be against the law to connect these two together. IBM has no plans to make any further improvements.
Question: When will [IBM BladeCenter S] support 2.5-inch drives?
Answer: You are in the wrong session! Go to "Ask the eXperts" session next door!
Question: The TSM GUI sucks! Are there any plans to improve it?
Answer: Yes, we are aware that products like IBM XIV have raised the bar for what people expect from graphical user interfaces. We have plans to improve the TSM GUI. IBM's new GUI for the SAN Volume Controller and Storwize V7000 has been well-received, and will be used as a template for the GUIs of other storage hardware and software products. The GUI uses the latest HTML5, Dojo widgets and AJAX technologies, eliminating Java dependencies on the client browser.
Question: Can we run the TSM Admin GUI from a non-Windows host?
Answer: IBM has plans to offer this. Most likely, this will be browser-based, so that any OS with a modern browser can be used.
Question: As hard disk drives grow larger in capacity, RAID-5 becomes less viable. What is IBM doing to address this?
Answer: IBM is aware of this problem. IBM offers RAID-DP on the IBM N series, RAID-X on the IBM XIV, and RAID-6 on its other disk systems.
Question: TPC licensing is outrageous! What is IBM going to do about it?
Answer: IBM introduced the [Tivoli Storage Productivity Center for Disk Midrange Edition (MRE)] to help address the cost when Small and Medium-sized Businesses managing SVC, Storwize V7000, DS5000 and DS3000 disk systems.
Question: What is the adoption rate of IBM Easy Tier?
Answer: About 25 percent of DS8000 disk systems have SSD installed. Now that IBM DS8000 Easy Tier supports "any two" tiers, roughly 50 percent of DS8000 now have Easy Tier activated. No idea on how Easy Tier has been adopted on SVC or Storwize V7000.
Question: We have an 8-node SVC cluster, should we put 8 SSD drives into a single node-pair, or spread them out?
Answer: We recommend putting a separate Solid-State Drive in each SVC node, with RAID-1 between nodes of a node-pair. By separating the SSD across I/O groups, you can reduce node-to-node traffic.
Question: How well has SVC 6.2 been adopted?
Answer: The inventory call-home data is not yet available. The only SVC hardware model that does not support this level of software was the 2145-4F2 introduced in 2003. Every other model since then can be updated to this level.
Question: Will IBM offer 600GB FDE drives for the IBM DS8700?
Answer: Currently, IBM offers 300GB and 450GB 15K RPM drives with the Full-Disk Encryption (FDE) capability for the DS8700, and 450GB and 600GB 10K RPM drives with FDE for the IBM DS8800. IBM is working with its disk suppliers to offer FDE on other disk capacities, and on SSD and NL-SAS drives as well, so that all can be used with IBM Easy Tier.
Question: Is there a reason for the feature lag between the Easy Tier capabilities of the DS8000, and that of the SVC/Storwize V7000?
Answer: We have one team for Easy Tier, so they implement it first on DS8000, then port it over to SVC/Storwize V7000.
Question: Does it even make sense to have separate storage tiers, especially when you factor in the cost of SVC and TPC to make it manageable?
Answer: It depends! We understand this is a trade-off between cost and complexity. Most data centers have three or more storage tiers already, so products like SVC can help simplify interoperability.
Question: Are there best practices for combining SVC with DS8000? Can we share one DS8000 system across two or more SVC clusters?
Answer: Yes, you can share one DS8000 across multiple SVC clusters. DS8000 has auto-restripe, so consider having two big extent pools. The queue depth is 3 to 60, so aim to have up to 60 managed disks on your DS8000 assigned to SVC. The more managed disks the better.
Question: The IBM System Storage Interopability Center (SSIC) site does not seem to be designed well for SAN Volume Controller.
Answer: Yes, we are aware of that. It was designed based on traditional Hardware Compatability Lists (HCL), but storage virtualization presents unique challenges.
Question: How does the 24-hour learning period work for IBM Easy Tier? We have batch processing that runs from 2am to 8am on Sundays.
Answer: You can have Easy Tier monitor across this batch job window, and turn Easy Tier management between tiers on and off as needed.
Question: Now that NetApp has acquired LSI, is the DS3000 still viable?
Answer: Yes, IBM has a strong OEM relationship with both NetApp and LSI, and this continues after the acquisition.
Question: If have managed disks from a DS8000 multi-rank extent pool assigned to multiple SVC clusters, won't this affect performance?
Answer: Yes, possibly. Keep managed disks on seperate extent pools if this is a big concern. A PERL script is available to re-balance SVC striped volumes as needed after these changes.
Question: Is the IBM [TPC Reporter] a replacement for IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center?
Answer: No, it is software, available at no additional charge, that provides additional reporting to those who have already licensed Tivoli Storage Productivity Center 4.1 and above. It will be updated as needed when new versions of Productivity Center are released.
Question: We are experiencing lots of stability issues with SDD, SDD-PCM and SDD-DSM multipathing drivers. Are these getting the development attention they deserve?
Answer: IBM's direction is to shift toward native OS-based multipathing drivers.
Question: Is anyone actually thinking of deploying public cloud storage in the near-term?
Answer: A few hands in the audience were raised.
Question: None of the IBM storage devices seem to have [REST API]. Cloud storage providers are demanding this. What are IBM plans?
Answer: IBM plans to offer REST on SONAS. IBM uses SONAS internally for its own cloud storage offerings.
Question: If you ask a DB2 specialist, an AIX specialist, and a System Storage specialist, on how to configure System p and System Storage for optimal performance, you get three different answers. Are there any IBMers who are cross-functional that can help?
Answer: Yes, for example, Earl Jew is an IBM Field Technical Support Specialist (FTSS) for both System p and Storage, and can help you with that.
Question: Both Oracle and Microsoft recommend RAID-10 for their applications.
Answer: Don't listen to them. Feel free to use RAID-5, RAID-6 or RAID-X instead.
Question: Resizing SVC source volumes forces ongoing FlashCopy or Metro Mirror relatiohships to be stopped. Does IBM plan to address this?
Answer: Currently, you have to stop, resize both source and target, then start the relationship again. Consider getting IBM Tivoli Storage Productivity Center for Replication (TPC-R).
Question: What ever happened to IBM [Grid Medical Archive Solution (GMAS)]?
Answer: IBM continues to support this for exising clients. For new deployments, IBM offers SONAS and the Information Archive (IA).
Question: When will I be able to move SVC volumes between I/O groups?
Answer: You can today, but it is disruptive to the operating system. IBM is investigating making this less disruptive.
Question: Will XIV ever support the mainframe?
Answer: It does already, with support for both Linux and z/VM today. For VSE support, use SVC with XIV. For those with the new zBX extension, XIV storage can be used with all of the POWER and x86-based operating systems supported. IBM has no plans to offer direct FICON attachment for z/OS or z/TPF.
Question: Not a question - Kudos to the TSM and ProtecTIER team in supporting native IP-based replication!
Answer: Thanks!
Question: When will IBM offer POWER-based models of the XIV, SVC and other storage devices?
Answer: IBM's decision to use industry-standard x86 technology has proven quite successful. However, IBM re-looks at this decision every so many years. Once again, the last iteration determined that it was not worth doing. A POWER-based model might not beat the price/performance of current x86 models, and maintaining two separate code bases would hinder development of new innovations.
Question: We have both System i and System z, what is IBM doing to address the fact that PowerHA and GDPS are different?
Answer: IBM TPC-R has a service offering extension to support "IBM i" environments. GDPS plans to support multi-platform environments as well.

This was a great interactive session. I am glad everyone stayed late Thursday evening to participate in this discussion.

technorati tags: IBM, storage, Tivoli, BRMS, TSM, BladeCenter, GUI, HTML5, AJAX, Dojo, SVC, Storwize V7000, RAID-10, RAID-5, RAID-6, RAID-DP, RAID-X, , DS3000, DS8000, MRE, FDE, SSIC, NetApp, LSI, PERL, SDD, Cloud, REST, SONAS, GDPS, TPC-R, TPC, Productivity Center, Earl Jew



Tags:  ssic sonas raid-10 gdps storwize+v7000 gui raid-6 cloud perl fde rest raid-5 html5 sdd storage earl+jew netapp brms ds8000 tpc mre bladecenter ibm tivoli raid-dp productivity+center dojo lsi tpc-r tsm ds3000 ajax svc raid-x
  • Show:
  • 10
  • 20
  • 30
  • Previous
  • Next
1
Inside System Storage -- by Tony Pearson
  • Share
  • ?
  • Profiles ▼
  • Communities ▼
  • Apps ▼