• Add a Comment
  • Edit
  • More Actions v
  • Quarantine this Entry

Comments (2)

1 localhost commented Permalink

Given the choice between an RSS and Atom feed, I always choose the Atom feed. I think the real issue is that not everyone provides Atom feeds yet, so it is still necessary to support *processing* RSS feeds but not necessarily *providing* them, and the preferred or default ought to be Atom.

 
Take Google, for example. Their feed reader, Google Reader, supports Atom and RSS. Their blog engine, Blogger, only provides Atom feeds. I believe IBM should take a similar approach.
 
According to [2], IBM engineer Sam Ruby "spearheaded the Atom effort." It's also an open-standard, whereas, as you mentioned, RSS is frozen and merely released under the Creative Commons License, which allows projects to build upon RSS under a different name. That's essentially what Atom is.
 
Sources:[1]http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/Rss20AndAtom10Compared[2]http://news.com.com/2100-1032-5157662.html

2 localhost commented Permalink

Well,

 
let's not forget MS with their Vista and RSS integration. I suspect that anything they integrate into Vista will prevail no matter how advanced the other technology might be. Not that I am in favour of it, it is just a well known fact you have to count with.

Add a Comment Add a Comment