Planned obsolescence is also known as built-in obsolescence is an economic or industrial measure of designing a device or a product with timed in or designated lifespan to increase revenue for the company in the near future.
There is no doubt that car makers, appliance producers, software companies and other manufacturers knowingly design their products to last to a certain extent of time. One of the best ways to fight and curtail this practice is to repair and maintain your product, either by yourself or using professional services such as https://zeto.ua. And finally, if consumers and general public doesn’t push against this practice, it is likely to continue.
That is why it’s important to raise your voice about this, stop supporting companies that are the worst offenders, and demand durability. We had it before, and we can have it again. But for now, let’s dive deeper into what this trend is.
Simply put, contrived durability is a market strategy abbreviating the products lifetime prior to market release, by a quicker deterioration.
The strategy of abbreviated durability is mostly not approved by the law. On the other side, manufacturers have the freedom to determine the durability of their product.
This strategy is also known as stylistic obsolescence. In other words, it occurs when designers alter the stylistic perception of the product in order to lure customers in more stylish and fashionable products, thus making increased purchases.
An increasing amount of products are desired for their looks and aesthetic compared to their functional benefits making perceived obsolescence one of the top strategies in planned obsolescence.
Systematic obsolescence is the intentional disablement of a product to prevent its functionality, thus forcing the consumer to purchase a substitution. One of the popular examples is the situation when inkjet producers create a placement of smart chips in their ink cartridges for further prevention of operability after a designated threshold. This is labeled as “programmed systematic obsolescence” for there is no random component giving a contribution to a functional decline.
Planned obsolescence today
A perfect example of such practice is the popular “Apple performance scheme”. The company has acknowledged what the customers were getting aware of. They admitted of slowing down the performance of outdated iPhone devices.
Reason to justify this as it was stated is that performance curtailment was put in place to compensate for battery degradation. An obvious reason for this is to force consumers to upgrade to a newer model, just to face the same issue in the near future. Hence repeating the process in order to create an increasing amount of yearly profit for the company.
When the market becomes competitive field lifespans of the commodities are inclined to increase. A supreme example is when Japanese automobiles back in the 60s and 70s were imported to America with increased lifespan compared to the American. The American car industry was forced to put out a more durable product on the market.
In 2015, as large civil movements continue to fight companies and product makers in their goal to create an impermanent product across the European Union, different countries including France have passed law legislation obliging that appliance producers and distributors declare the considered product lifespan. In some cases, mandatory warranties of two years are applied.
Let us not forget the software
Software companies from time to time discontinue the practice of customer support in their older created software in an ever-increasing attempt to pressurize the users to update to more advanced systems. Software that is discontinued or cast aside is often referred to as abandonware.