DevOps

Here’s what the industry is getting wrong about APM

Share this post:

IBM APM Application Process ManagementRecently, you may have seen news about recent consolidation in the application process management (APM) space. Some might see this as the industry making big bets on combining network management with application management.

But I see it differently. This is an area that has not yet yielded results because the personas using these tools have very different needs and expectations. Let me explain.

IBM has been in the application monitoring space for more than 20 years. I see a very different trend emerging. As applications get more complex in today’s cloud era, the data processed in the monitoring space is growing exponentially. To support hybrid applications and infrastructure, you must have solutions that provide useful visibility and insight into data performance with features such as predictive analytics and cognitive ChatBots.

Cognitive technologies are replacing labor-intensive techniques to help practitioners sort through data and prioritize the analytical options. The industry is beginning to see the true value of cognitive capabilities, including gathering historical application data, making predictions and fixing problems automatically.

The shift to hybrid applications and DevOps methodologies are also impacting who uses APM and they use it. With rapid innovation and continuous delivery becoming a priority of many digital businesses, the need for APM to be introduced in the early stages of development and testing phase has become a growing trend.

As a result, APM is “shifting left” to become an integral part of application development and testing—beyond its continued use as a monitoring tool post-launch. I’ve seen planning for monitoring and management being done before the first line of code is being written.  Smart. It is critical for APM solutions to adapt to DevOps needs and deliver value to DevOps users to be successful in the future.

Some companies may see value by investing in monitoring and transaction profiling for IT Operations teams. But to me the trends show that APM users seem most interested in DevOps and cognitive technologies. One key to making users happy is to automate problem prevention and avoiding “war rooms.” This is a huge improvement over traditional uses cases of speeding up problem resolution.

Not every vendor can provide the solutions, integrations and insight to help companies keep up with the future of APM. But IBM can. IBM APM offers a deep view your infrastructure, application and user-experience to identify, isolate, diagnose and automatically resolve problems before they start affecting your users. With advanced cognitive capabilities, you’ll uncover source code problems long before an issue creates consequences. And you can diagnose problems using correlated log search and analysis and predictive insights.

Don’t settle for old fashioned, siloed application management when you can jump on the spaceship to the future.  Check out what IBM APM has to offer here. And for more on the industry’s best expertise on APM and its future, join us at InterConnect 2017 this March.

Product Manager - Application performance management

More DevOps stories

Process modeling is the first step to Lean Six Sigma success

Lean Six Sigma is a combination of two process improvement methods: Lean and Six Sigma. It’s designed to reduce organizational costs by removing waste, or “muda”, from a process through continual business processes improvement. By removing waste and reducing process variation, organizations can improve overall production quality and efficiency. Why use a process model? Organizations […]

Continue reading

Industry experts weigh in on the future of automation and DevOps

Application teams need reporting. They specifically need pipeline analytics to measure and optimize metrics, such as deployment frequency and deployment success, to find and fix practices that are slowing them down and orchestrate releases. In its latest Continuous Delivery and Release Automation Wave Report, Forrester noted that reporting can be a “weak spot” for much […]

Continue reading

Continuous integration vs. continuous delivery: A quick explainer

As DevOps moves from a trend at born-on-the-web firms to a set of well-accepted best practices, many enterprises are embracing the approach. If you’re only getting started, terms like continuous integration and continuous delivery probably sound a lot alike. There are, however, some big differences that are important to understand. What is continuous integration? As […]

Continue reading