Element or feature: | SDSF. |
When change was introduced: | General migration action not tied to a specific release. |
Applies to migration from: | z/OS V1R13 and z/OS V1R12. |
Timing: | Before the first IPL of z/OS V2R1. |
Is the migration action required? | No, but recommended to avoid the migration action of reassembling your customized ISFPARMS for each z/OS® release. (If you do not use dynamic statements for ISFPARMS, reassembly of your customized ISFPARMS is required on each release.) |
Target system hardware requirements: | None. |
Target system software requirements: | None. |
Other system (coexistence or fallback) requirements: | None. |
Restrictions: | None. |
System impacts: | None. |
Related IBM® Health Checker for z/OS check: | Use check SDSF_ISFPARMS_IN_USE to verify that SDSF dynamic statements in ISFPRMxx are being used rather than the assembler macros. If the check determines that the assembler macro ISFPARMS is in use instead, and that it has been modified, the check generates an exception. If the assembler macro ISFPARMS is in use but it has not been modified, so that all defaults are in effect, the check does not generate an exception. SDSF registers this check with the IBM Health Checker for z/OS infrastructure when the SDSF server address space is initialized. However, one of the items this check verifies is that the SDSF server itself is in use, so you have to manually add this check (particularly if you do not use the SDSF server) so that the IBM Health Checker for z/OS infrastructure will invoke the check. To add the check, put the following statement in your PROGxx parmlib member: EXIT ADD EXITNAME(HZSADDCHECK) MODNAME(ISFHCADC). SDSF health checks are distributed in ISF.SISFLOAD for installations running SDSF in the LNKLST. The checks are also distributed in ISF.SISFLINK for installations that do not run SDSF in the LNKLST. For those installations, ISF.SISFLINK must be added to the LNKLST. Note: To avoid a
possible ABEND 290 with reason code 02014007 issued by HZSADDCK:
|
Steps to take: If you are already using dynamic statements for ISFPARMSxx, there is no migration action to perform.