IBM Support

IT02571: With "SPLITLARGEObjects" enabled, BACKUP STGPOOL can REPORT SUCCESS When some bitfiles have not been sent to copy pool.

Subscribe

You can track all active APARs for this component.

 

APAR status

  • Closed as program error.

Error description

  • With version 7.1 server with node attribute "SPLITLARGEObjects"
    enabled,
    it can happen that backup stgpool can report success but not
    actually
    backup certain files to the copy storage pool.
    This can happen when the first
    fragment(s) has been sent to the copypool already and backup
    stgpool retries as the whole object has not been sent.
    
    For example, running consecutive backup stgpool commands, it can
    be
    seen that same 6 items are reported as backed up each time.
    
    06/01/2014 11:08:52  ANR0986I Process 4756 for BACKUP STORAGE
    POOL
                          running in
                          the BACKGROUND processed 6 items for a
    total of
                          45,374,028,876 bytes with a completion
    state of
                          SUCCESS
                          at 11:08:52 AM. (SESSION: 87293, PROCESS:
    4756)
    06/01/2014 13:09:22  ANR0986I Process 4757 for BACKUP STORAGE
    POOL
                          running in
                          the BACKGROUND processed 6 items for a
    total of
                          45,374,028,876 bytes with a completion
    state of
                          SUCCESS
                          at 01:09:22 PM. (SESSION: 87317, PROCESS:
    4757)
    06/01/2014 15:09:27  ANR0986I Process 4758 for BACKUP STORAGE
    POOL
                          running in
                          the BACKGROUND processed 6 items for a
    total of
                          45,374,028,876 bytes with a completion
    state of
                          SUCCESS
                          at 03:09:27 PM. (SESSION: 87341, PROCESS:
    4758)
    
    No errors are reported in activity log.
    
    Looking at server trace, ( AF BF AS SS BACK BACKD flags in this
    example) the same bitfiles are seen each time for each backup
    stgpool process:
    
    14:02:02.564 [199][afcputil.c][4840][CopyCluster]:Copying
    bitfiles for
    cluster SrvId=0, PoolId=6, Ck1=9, Ck2=2, for volume
    T05011(1020457)
    14:02:27.154 [199][afcputil.c][5595][CopyBatch]:Copying bitfile
    batch
    SrvId=0, PoolId=6, Ck1=9, Ck2=2, Count=1, for volume
    T05011(1020457)
    14:02:27.154 [199][bfcopy.c][227][BfCopy]:Copying bitfile
    24835426 from
    pool 6 to pool -1
    14:04:21.476 [199][afcputil.c][4840][CopyCluster]:Copying
    bitfiles for
    cluster SrvId=0, PoolId=6, Ck1=9, Ck2=2, for volume
    T05111(1020467)
    14:04:21.486 [199][afcputil.c][5595][CopyBatch]:Copying bitfile
    batch
    SrvId=0, PoolId=6, Ck1=9, Ck2=2, Count=4, for volume
    T05111(1020467)
    14:04:21.486 [199][bfcopy.c][227][BfCopy]:Copying bitfile
    24809803 from
    pool 6 to pool -1
    14:06:01.047 [199][bfcopy.c][227][BfCopy]:Copying bitfile
    24809804 from
    pool 6 to pool -1
    14:06:46.591 [199][bfcopy.c][227][BfCopy]:Copying bitfile
    24809805 from
    pool 6 to pool -1
    14:07:31.763 [199][bfcopy.c][227][BfCopy]:Copying bitfile
    24809806 from
    pool 6 to pool -1
    14:08:43.797 [199][afcputil.c][5595][CopyBatch]:Copying bitfile
    batch
    SrvId=0, PoolId=6, Ck1=9, Ck2=2, Count=1, for volume
    T05111(1020467)
    14:08:43.797 [199][bfcopy.c][227][BfCopy]:Copying bitfile
    24809807 from
    pool 6 to pool -1
    
    these bitfiles are fragments in a Super Aggregate and are not
    being backed up
    to copy storage pool. Each backup stgpool will show same
    fragments being copied again.
    
    
    Tivoli Storage Manager versions affected:
    server 7.1 on all platforms
    
    Initial Impact: Medium
    
    Additional Keywords:
    zz71 tsm backup stgpool fragments
    

Local fix

Problem summary

  • ****************************************************************
    * USERS AFFECTED:                                              *
    * All Tivoli Storage Manager server users.                     *
    ****************************************************************
    * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:                                         *
    * See ERROR DESCRIPTION.                                       *
    ****************************************************************
    * RECOMMENDATION:                                              *
    * Apply fixing levels when available.                          *
    * This problem is currently projected                          *
    * to be fixed in levels 7.1.0.100 and 7.1.1.                   *
    * Note that this is subject                                    *
    * to change at the discretion of IBM.                          *
    ****************************************************************
    

Problem conclusion

  • This problem was fixed.
    Affected platforms:  AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Linux, and Windows.
    

Temporary fix

Comments

APAR Information

  • APAR number

    IT02571

  • Reported component name

    TSM SERVER

  • Reported component ID

    5698ISMSV

  • Reported release

    71L

  • Status

    CLOSED PER

  • PE

    NoPE

  • HIPER

    NoHIPER

  • Special Attention

    NoSpecatt

  • Submitted date

    2014-06-19

  • Closed date

    2014-07-24

  • Last modified date

    2014-07-24

  • APAR is sysrouted FROM one or more of the following:

  • APAR is sysrouted TO one or more of the following:

Fix information

  • Fixed component name

    TSM SERVER

  • Fixed component ID

    5698ISMSV

Applicable component levels

  • R71A PSY

       UP

  • R71H PSY

       UP

  • R71L PSY

       UP

  • R71S PSY

       UP

  • R71W PSY

       UP

[{"Line of Business":{"code":"LOB26","label":"Storage"},"Business Unit":{"code":"BU058","label":"IBM Infrastructure w\/TPS"},"Product":{"code":"SSGSG7","label":"Tivoli Storage Manager"},"Platform":[{"code":"PF025","label":"Platform Independent"}],"Version":"7.1.3"}]

Document Information

Modified date:
25 September 2021