RE: [cciug] Best Implementing with attache

From: Ted Jardine (ted.jardine@aspentech.com)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 19:48:29 EDT


What are the developers going to use to access CC via Attache? You used to
need an Attache license for each such user, but they don't make them
anymore, since all Windows platforms can now install CC. The Attache helper
is invoked by the albd_server process for those who still use it, but I'm
all but positive that licenses are needed. Remember, TANSTAAFL!

Ted
---------------
Ted Jardine Sr. SCM Administrator
Aspen Technology, Inc. 19204 North Creek Parkway
425.492.2272 (office, voice mail) Bothell, WA 98011 USA
mailto:ted.jardine@aspentech.com Avocation:
http://www.aspentech.com Flight Instructor, Airplanes &
Instruments
"Keep the pointy end forward, the dirty side down."

-----Original Message-----
From: Cristina Lopez [mailto:clopez@abits.com.mx
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 17:43
To: cciug@rational.com
Subject: [cciug] Best Implementing with attache

Hello everybody:

I am trying to get the optimum configuration for a customer who wants to
implement ClearCase in his company. He has a central repository which
contains the common components for his applications, and around 5 areas
which develop their own applications.

I think that he can have a special server (Rational Server) which works like
VOB server, view server, license server, registry server and server for
other rational tools. For this server he can get 2 ClearCase NT license (one
for the main administrator and other for the responsible in the area). The
clients can use attaché. The problem is that I don't have experience using
attaché.

What do you think?? Is this the best option?? Which are the advantage and
disadvantage to use attaché??

I will appreciate any comments and suggestions.

Thanks

Cristina
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 00:26:39 EDT