Humm, I disagree with this. Within the implementation of UCM that I
have set up for
the time being, a developer will work on certain activities, and when
the work associated
with an activity is at a buildable stage, but not necessarily
complete, the developer
will deliver it. This allows other developers to use their code for
their development. The
original developer will then continue to work in that same activity
until all the functionality
is complete, possibly performing many deliveries of that same
activity.
I took this approach so that there aren't thousands of activities
created for things such
as: my_code_buildable_state, my_code_next_milestone, etc.
Cheers,
Robin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Schroeder <klauss@poet.de>
To: cciug@rational.com <cciug@rational.com>
Date: Friday, September 08, 2000 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: [cciug] suppress delivered activities?
I was also disappointed that Rational did not change this behavior
with CC
4.1. It should be so easy, it's just some GUI stuff needed to
distinguish
active activities from already delivered ones.
I would be also interested if somebody knows a way to handle this
in CC
Explorer and in Project Explorer.
Klaus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cciug@rational.com
[mailto:owner-cciug@rational.comOn
> Behalf Of Jim Pinkham
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 6:28 PM
> To: cciug@rational.com
> Subject: [cciug] suppress delivered activities?
>
>
>
> ClearCase 4.1 UCM CCExplorer
>
> I've noticed that after delivering an activity from a
development stream
> view, the activity remains in the 'My Activities' list and can
be set as
> current and re-used.
>
> Shouldn't activities 'go away' after being delivered? After a
while, the
> old activities will make current ones hard to find.
>
> Should we periodically drop the views to our streams and re-join
> the project
> to create new ones then? I like the idea of one stream per
> developer/project though.
>
> I tried setting a delivered activity to obsolete or locked, but
it won't
> sort or display differently. I can see how it would be valuable
> to go back
> and view the change sets of old activities, but there should
probably be a
> way to distinguish 'active' from 'already delivered' activities.
Am I
> missing something obvious here?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim Pinkham
> Executive Jet Aviation
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> can also
unsubscribe
>
>
http://clearcase.rational.com/cciug/mailing_list.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
can also
unsubscribe
http://clearcase.rational.com/cciug/mailing_list.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 00:26:28 EDT