Greg Dickie wrote:
> My 2 cents. Do not do this. Branching for a platform port is bad and merging is
> almost impossible. It might be painful but try to stay in the same branch.
Would you please be so kind and explain (briefly) why you advise against
branching? Or do you take this as a port where you burn your bridges, never to
return?
Thank you,
-WLaun
>
>
> Greg
>
> On 03-Feb-00 John Lawlor wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We are in the early stages of ClearCase and don't really use branches until
> > now.
> >
> > One of the development groups wants to create a branch for doing NT
> > development work only and then merge it back in a few weeks (another story).
> > The development group each use their own views.
> >
> > What is the best way to manage this branch?. All I have come up with so far
> > is,
> > 1. Declare a branch type 'nt_development'
> > 2. Do a Cleartool mkbranch nt_development.
> >
> > These raise a few questions,
> > Can I branch the whole project or can I only do one file at a time?
> > If I get the developers to setup the views with these rules:
> > element * CHECKEDOUT
> > element * /main/nt_development/LATEST
> > element * /MAIN/1 -mkbranch nt_development
> > that will branch each file version onto this branch, but will I have to
> > merge the files back in 1 by 1?
> >
> > What is the best/smoothest way to get through this?
> >
> > All ideas are very very welcome.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > John.
> >
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >
> >
> >
> > http://clearcase.rational.com/cciug/mailing_list.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Greg Dickie
> Just A Guy*
> *from discreet (the logic is gone)
> Montreal
> (514) 954-7171
> greg@discreet.com
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 00:22:58 EDT