Instead of locking the VOB we use a time stamp.
element * /main/LATEST -time 31 Jan 08:00:00
Thanks
._____._._. _ .___.
| | | | |/ /| __|
| | | < | __| /\_/\
|_|_|_|_|_|\_\|___| (0-0)
-----------------------------too--(_)-Ooo--------------
Service is the cornerstone, integrity the foundation,
perseverance the key, for our commitment to
excellence." Oooo.
------------------------------.oooO---( )------------
Michael Browning ( ) ) /
michael.browning@per-se.com \ ( (_/
"Trust in Him" \_)
Senior Software Development Environment Engineer
Per-Se/San Bernardino 268 W. Hospitality Lane #300
San Bernardino, Ca 92408 San Bernardino, Ca 92408
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cciug@iname.com [mailto:cciug@iname.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 7:46 PM
> To: Browning, Michael; Niemiec, Greg; cciug
> Subject: [cciug] Administering Unix VOBs from NT
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
> Can anyone tell me, is it common practice to lock a
> vob/branch, etc before
> doing a build to ensure what
> is being built? Does anyone use other methods.
>
> Relatedly, I'm not very adept at NT and would normally
> lock a VOB from Unix (since that is where the VOB
> server is) using the vobadm account. How does one go
> about locking the Unix server VOB from NT and what
> setup is required?
>
> Thanks, jay
> (I always put my name in lowers when asking an NT
> question because I'm quite ignorant)
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Get free personalized email at http://www.iname.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> can also
> unsubscribe
>
> http://clearcase.rational.com/cciug/mailing_list.html
>
> ------ Message Header Follows ------
> Received: from medaphis.com by corpmail.medaphis.com
> (PostalUnion/SMTP(tm) v2.2 (Build 22008) for Windows NT(tm))
> id AA-2000Jan27.224639.1196.1629326; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:46:40 -0500
> Received: from mailgw.per-se.com by medaphis.com
> (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id
> WAA04917; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:45:27 -0500
> Received: from mailgw.rational.com (mailgw.rational.com
> [130.213.254.1])
> by mailgw.per-se.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA22554;
> Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:45:26 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from mailhub.rational.com (mailhub [130.213.131.8])
> by mailgw.rational.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/RATIONAL-mailgw) with
> ESMTP id QAA04263;
> Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:30:32 -0800 (PST)
> Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
> by mailhub.rational.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/RATIONAL-mailhub) with
> SMTP id QAA12983;
> Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:30:18 -0800
> Received: by majordomo.rational.com (bulk_mailer v1.8); Thu,
> 27 Jan 2000
> 16:29:47 -0800
> Received: (from majordom@localhost)
> by mailhub.rational.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/RATIONAL-mailhub) id QAA12487
> for cciug-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:29:43 -0800
> From: cciug@iname.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Message-Id: <000127192934LF.13500@weba2.iname.net>
> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 19:29:34 -0500 (EST)
> Content-Type: Text/Plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> To: cciug@rational.com
> Subject: [cciug] Administering Unix VOBs from NT
> Sender: owner-cciug@rational.com
> X-Majordomo-Taboo: cciug
> Precedence: bulk
>
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 00:22:42 EDT