Just to ride on more on this topic, we are also in the process of setting up
interop here and I'm in the early stages of checking the feasibility/efficiency
of which setup to use: NFS Maestro on NT clients vs. TAS on the HPUX
server....can anyone give me more insights on both and suggest ways to better
set it up....BTW, I'm pretty new to NT Administration so I'd still have to learn
the ins and outs of domains, group env variables and other Window stuffs....
Thanks
Mervin
"navjeet swatch" <nswatch@hotmail.com> on 01/21/2000 08:34:06 AM
To: QUSERRE@am1.ericsson.se
cc: cciug@Rational.Com (bcc: Mervin Manangan/CTS/US/INSTINET)
Subject: Re: [cciug] Advice on choosing a UNIX server for Clearcase
>Navjeet,
>
>Before you decide to switch have you also factored in the required NFS
>client for each NT desktop?
>
>
>Eric R.
>
I'd probably go for TAS as it's a server solution and it seems the consenus
on cciug is that it's perfectly good. I don't think it's much different in
cost from an NFS client solution. Samba, I understand, is not supported by
Rational so I don't want to use it.
Nav Swatch
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 00:22:33 EDT