So sorry, I meant single level branching, too early in the morning! It is
not really an awful limitation. The branches are based on developer/activity
combination. This avoids a lot of confusion and as far as I understand
pretty much eliminates the need to write config-specs as the various UCM
wizards automate such tasks. You can then further customize the config-spec.
However with such automation you loose the ability to have a bugfix branch
off another bugfix branch etc.
Regards,
Alex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Alex Batlin | alex.batlin@nomura.co.uk
Nomura International plc, Nomura House| Phone: +44 (0)20 7521 3728
1 St. Martin's-le-Grand, London EC1A 4NP | Fax: +44 (0)20 7521 3686
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
The information contained in this message is intended for the named
recipients
only. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, you must not
copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on it and you should notify the
sender
immediately. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or
error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or
incomplete, or contain viruses, and Nomura International plc excludes
liability for
(1) any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as
a result
of e-mail transmission and (2) the transmission of any viruses. If
verification is
required please request a hard-copy version. Nomura International plc is
regulated
by the Securities and Futures Authority Limited and is a member of the
London
Stock Exchange.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
-----Original Message-----
From: Rosendahl Sten - stro [mailto:stro@im.se
Sent: 11 January 2000 10:01
To: 'Batlin, Alex'; CCIUG (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [cciug] [Q] CC4.0 & UCM
alex.batlin@nomura.co.uk (Alex) wrote:
> UCM
> * Can be easy to implement out of the box if no SCM
> policy exists
> * Most likely will not be used by well established
> houses as it only
> allowes single branches
You mean single-level branching only? Or that a single branch type is
applied to all VOBs? The last and (much, much more limiting) a single base
label type is what we hated most about view profiles in CC 3.2.1 (and the
fact that any custom base rules are wiped out when activating a private
branch).
-- Sten Rosendahl, IMI Corp.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 00:22:23 EDT