RE: [cciug] [Q] CC4.0 & UCM

From: Rosendahl Sten - stro (stro@im.se)
Date: Tue Jan 11 2000 - 05:01:14 EST


alex.batlin@nomura.co.uk (Alex) wrote:

> UCM
> * Can be easy to implement out of the box if no SCM
> policy exists
> * Most likely will not be used by well established
> houses as it only
> allowes single branches

You mean single-level branching only? Or that a single branch type is
applied to all VOBs? The last and (much, much more limiting) a single base
label type is what we hated most about view profiles in CC 3.2.1 (and the
fact that any custom base rules are wiped out when activating a private
branch).

 -- Sten Rosendahl, IMI Corp.

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 06 2001 - 00:22:23 EDT