Anatomy of Linux journaling file systems

Journaling today and tomorrow


You can define journaling file systems in many ways, but let's get right to the point. Journaling file systems are for people who tire of watching the boot-time fsck, or file system consistency check process. (Journaling file systems are also for anyone who likes the idea of a fault-resilient file system.) When a system using a traditional, non-journaling file system is improperly shut down, the operating system detects this and performs a consistency check using the fsck utility. This utility scans the file system (which can take a considerable amount of time) and fixes any issues that can be safely corrected. In some cases, the file system can be in such bad shape that the operating system boots into single user mode to allow the user to further the repair process.

So, now you know for whom journaling file systems were created, but how do they obviate the need for fsck? In general, journaling file systems avoid file system corruption by maintaining a journal. The journal is a special file that logs the changes destined for the file system in a circular buffer. At periodic intervals, the journal is committed to the file system. If a crash occurs, the journal can be used as a checkpoint to recover unsaved information and avoid corrupting file system metadata.

To sum up, journaling file systems are fault-resilient file systems that use a journal to log changes before they're committed to the file system to avoid metadata corruption (see Figure 1). But like many Linux solutions, more than one option is available to you. Let's take a short walk through journaling file system history, and then review the file systems available and how they differ.

Figure 1. A typical journaling file system
A typical journaling file system
A typical journaling file system

Linux journaling file system history

The first journaled file system was the IBM® Journaled File System (JFS). JFS was first released in 1990, but the current version supported in Linux is the later-developed JFS2. In 1994, Silicon Graphics introduced the high-performance XFS for the IRIX operating system. XFS was ported into Linux in 2001. The Smart File System (SFS) was developed for the Amiga in 1998, but then released under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) and supported under Linux in 2005. The most commonly used journaling file system, ext3fs (or third extended file system) is an extension of ext2 with journaling capabilities. The ext3fs has been supported in Linux since 2001. Finally, the ReiserFS journaling file system blazed many new trails when it was introduced and found wide adoption. Its evolution is now diminished because of the legal issues of its original author.

Variations on journaling

Journaling file systems use a journal to buffer changes to the file system (which is also used in crash recovery) but can use different strategies for when and what is journaled. Three of the most common strategies are writeback, ordered, and data.

In writeback mode, only the metadata is journaled, and the data blocks are written directly to their location on the disk. This preserves the file system structure and avoids corruption, but data corruption can occur (for example, if the system crashes after the metadata is journaled but before the data block is written). To solve this problem, you can use ordered mode. Ordered mode is metadata journaling only but writes the data before journaling the metadata. In this way, data and file system are guaranteed consistent after a recovery. Finally, data journaling can also be supported. In data mode, both metadata and data are journaled. This mode offers the greatest protection against file system corruption and data loss but can suffer from performance degradation, as all data is written twice (first to the journal, then to the disk).

The journal commit policy can also differ in the various approaches. For example, is the journal committed when it nears full, or through a timeout?

Journaling file systems today

Today, several journaling file systems are actively used. Each has its own benefits and disadvantages. Here are the four most popular journaling file systems available today.


JFS2 (also called the enhanced journaled file system) was the first journaled file system and has many years of use in the IBM AIX® operating system before being ported to Linux. JFS2 is a 64-bit file system that, although based on the original JFS, was enhanced to be more scalable and support multi-processor architectures.

JFS2 supports ordered journaling for high performance with sub-second file system recovery. JFS2 also provides extent-based file allocation for performance. Extent-based allocation means that instead of allocating a single block, a contiguous set of blocks is allocated. Because these blocks are contiguous on the disk, there's better read and write performance for them. An additional advantage to extent-based allocation is minimization of metadata management. Allocating space by block means metadata updates per block. Using an extent, metadata is only updated for the extent (which can represent many blocks).

JFS2 also makes use of B+ trees for fast directory lookups as well as managing extent descriptors. JFS2 has no internal journal commit policy but instead relies on the timeout of the kupdate daemon.


XFS is one of the other early journaling file systems that was originally developed by Silicon Graphics for the IRIX operating system in 1995. XFS was ported to Linux in 2001 and, therefore, was already mature and reliable.

XFS supports full 64-bit addressing and provides very high performance using B+ trees both for directories and for file allocation. XFS also uses extent-based allocation with variable block size support (from 512 bytes to 64KB). Along with extents, XFS uses delayed allocation, in which allocation of disk blocks is delayed until the blocks are to be written to disk. This functionality improves the chances that sequential disk blocks are allocated, because the total number needed will be known.

Other interesting properties of XFS are guaranteed rate input/output (I/O—through bandwidth reservation for file system users) and direct I/O, where data is copied directly between the disk and the user space buffer (rather than being staged through multiple buffers). XFS uses the writeback journaling policy.

Third extended file system (ext3fs)

The third extended file system (ext3fs) is the most popular journaling file system and is the evolution of the popular ext2 file system. Ext3fs is actually compatible with ext2fs, because ext3fs uses the same structure from ext2fs and simply adds a journal. It's even possible to mount an ext3fs partition as an ext2 file system or convert an ext2 file system to an ext3 file system (using the tune2fs utility).

Ext3fs permits three types of journaling (writeback, ordered, and data) but uses ordered as the default mode. The journal commit policy is configurable but by default is based on filling 1/4 of the journal or through timeout of one of the commit timers.

One of the primary disadvantages of ext3fs is that it was not designed from the ground up as a journaling file system. Being based on ext2fs, it lacks some of the more recent advanced features found in other journaling file systems (such as extents). It also typically scores worse in performance when compared to ReiserFS, JFS, and XFS but requires less CPU and memory than competing solutions.


ReiserFS is a journaling file system that was developed from the ground up with journaling in mind. ReiserFS was introduced in 2001 in the mainline 2.4 kernel (the first journaling file system to be adopted by Linux). The default method for journaling is ordered and supports online resizing to grow the file system. ReiserFS also included tail packing to dynamically reduce fragmentation. For smaller files, ReiserFS tends to be much faster than ext3fs (when tail packing is enabled).

ReiserFS (also called ReiserFS v3) includes many modern features, such as B+ trees. The fundamental format of the file system is based on a single B+ tree, which makes search operations efficient and very scalable. The commit policy depends on the journal size but is based on the number of blocks to commit.

ReiserFS was plagued by several issues—most recently, by the legal troubles of its author (see Related topics for details).

Journaling file systems tomorrow

Now that you've seen the journaling file systems of today (and yesterday), let's look at what's ahead (and what's not).


After successfully getting ReiserFS merged into the Linux kernel and adopted by many Linux distributions, Namesys (the company behind ReiserFS) began work on a new journaling file system. Reiser4 was designed from scratch as a new journaling file system with many advanced features.

Resier4 was designed for better journaling through the use of wandering logs and delayed allocation of blocks until the journal is committed (as was done in XFS). Reiser4 was also designed with a flexible plug-in architecture (to support capabilities such as compression and encryption) but was rejected by the Linux community, as these capabilities were viewed best in the virtual file system (VFS).

Since the conviction of the owner of Namesys, all commercial activity on Reiser4 has stopped.

Fourth extended file system

The fourth extended journaling file system (ext4fs) is the evolution of ext3fs. The ext4 file system is designed as a backward- and forward-compliant replacement for ext3fs but with many new advanced features (some of which break the compatibility). This means that you can mount an ext4fs partition as ext3fs or vice versa.

First, ext4fs is a 64-bit file system and is designed to support very large volumes (1 exabyte). It has also been designed to use extents, but if this is used, then compatibility with ext3fs is lost. Like XFS and Reiser4, ext4fs includes delayed allocation to allocate blocks on the disk only when needed (which reduces fragmentation). The contents of the journal are also checksummed to make the journal more reliable. Instead of the standard B+ or B* tree, ext4fs uses a variation of the B tree, called the H tree, which allows much larger subdirectories (ext3 was limited to 32KB).

Although the delayed allocation method reduces fragmentation, over time, a large file system can become fragmented. An online defragmentation tool (e4defrag) has been developed to address this. You can use the tool to defragment individual files or an entire file system.

Another interesting difference between ext3fs and ext4fs is the date resolution for files. In ext3, the minimum resolution for timestamp was one second. Ext4fs is looking toward the future: Where processor and interface speeds continue to increase, better resolution is needed. For this reason, the minimum timestamp resolution in ext4 is 1 nanosecond.

Ext4fs has been in the Linux kernel since 2.6.19 but is yet to be called stable. Development continues on this next generation; given its heritage, it will be the next generation in Linux journaling file systems.

Going further

Journaling file systems provide reliability and protect against corruption in the face of system crash or power loss. Additionally, the crash recovery time for journaling file systems is dramatically reduced compared to more traditional file system methods (such as those that rely on fsck). Development of new journaling capabilities continues to look to the future at new algorithms and structures as well as to the past, where features of JFS and XFS are incorporated. How journaling file systems will evolve in the future is unclear, but their usefulness is clear, and they are the new file system standard.

Downloadable resources

Related topics


Sign in or register to add and subscribe to comments.

ArticleTitle=Anatomy of Linux journaling file systems