IBM®
Skip to main content
    Country/region [select]      Terms of use
 
 
    
     Home      Products      Services & industry solutions      Support & downloads      My IBM     
developerWorks  >  Blogs  >   developerWorks

author Technical and strategic insight on the present and future of the ibm.com website

Insights from the ibm.com team; a diverse group of people with a unique depth and breadth of experience in developing and managing a complex large enterprise site. The team will address many of the technical and managerial challenges associated with running such a large and complex website; focusing on the innovative solutions the team has or will be deploying. Topics covered will be diverse, ranging from asynchronous java and security to innovation in Agile and website accessibility.



Tuesday July 15, 2008

Ratings and reviews for business users ARE valuable!



OK, the results are in! During April and May I asked business users in USA, Denmark, and Sweden to tell me their experience of ratings and reviews (if you were one of them, thank you!). Given the focus and relatively short duration of the study, the sample rate was somewhat small (75 valid responses) which needs to be considered when looking at the results. However, some of the results are quite overwhelming so it should be possible to get a good pointer of the business users’ thoughts on the subject.

Overall, although not as mature as in the consumer space, ratings and reviews for business users is clearly seen as valuable. Most importantly, when looking at the results the findings from the study indicates that 93% of the respondents overall consider ratings and reviews for business users as Valuable or Very valuable.

Other findings include that ratings and reviews are highly rated as both reliable and trustworthy compared to other online information sources; it is seen as the most mature user-generated medium; and it is predominantly used in new-buy situations (96%).

Experience with ratings and reviews are greater for those respondents who participate in researching and evaluating new products or services in their job roles, and the medium is reported by a majority of the respondents to have influenced purchase decisions at some point. This latter point is of course of great interest for Marketers since it again indicates what affect ratings and reviews can have on purchase decisions.

The survey also asked business users about they perceived the benefits of ratings and reviews are:
- in looking for hands-on experience and transference
- in increasing trust, clarity and transparency in the manufacturer
- in minimizing uncertainty
- and providing information otherwise not available in the marketing text.

Some of the barriers reported are that respondents find it hard to know the experience and competence of the reviewer (89%), as well as distrusting if the reviews are authentic (69%).

To supplement the knowledge gained from the results of the study, key literature was investigated on topics such as:

Organizational buying - For the business user ratings and reviews are of course most likely used in the pre-purchase information stage when multiple sources of information are used, by multiple people. Here information is used as the key tactic to reduce uncertainty and risk, and helps the buyer in transference when judging potential partners or suppliers if they can be trusted. This online information (determined to be easily accessible and sharable) has also increased the customer power, affecting not only the Buying cycle but also the Selling cycle (Trailer and Dickie, 2007).

Word-of-Mouth (WOM) - The knowledge contained in the information is effectively spread through Word of mouth, and this is also related to the “age of advertising consciousness” since WOM is believed more trustworthy due to it not being connected to the manufacturer or service provider.

Trust - Several key factors in a 2-way communication are minimized in online ratings and reviews, and to bridge the gap in learning about competence, social bond, and reputation, characteristic-based and process-based trust-systems can be used – however, as studies shows, they are seldom used by B2B sites today, even though they rest on well proven theories and research (Son et al., 2006).

If you are interested in this subject I would be happy to learn about your thoughts! Perhaps you know of any good examples where ratings and reviews are being used in a B2B context? I would especially be interested in best practices when applying ratings and reviews to service offerings.

Have a good summer!


Christian C Carlsson
ibm.com Site Architecture team


Categories : [   buying_behavior  |  christian_carlsson  |  ibm.com  |  ratings_reviews  |  ratings_survey  |  research_results  |  reviews_survey  ]

Jul 15 2008, 10:37:44 AM EDT Permalink



Tuesday June 24, 2008

Under the hood of IBM’s next Web 2.0 Muscle Car, the Blue Business Platform



I’ve said it before – I’m not a technical person and the only code I know how to write is:

10 PRINT “BLUE BUSINESS PLATFORM”
20 GO TO 10

So when trying to explain what Blue Business Platform is from a more technical perspective I needed to find a way that makes it easier for me. Therefore I’ll try the Top Gear approach – taking a peek under the hood of IBM’s latest Web 2.0 Muscle Car.

But first, a re-cap: I wrote about the Blue Business Platform in May under the subject Enterprise 2.0. Since then there has been more press coverage, for instance here. In short, the Blue Business Platform is a marketplace where IBM partners and software developers can market and sell their solutions online to small and mid-size companies across the globe. This, of course, requires a flexible and innovative infrastructure. To learn more about the underlying technique, I sought help from Rosa Bolger who is one of the Site Architects involved in the project.

The engine is a V6.1 WebSphere Application Server which runs on fuel efficient IBM pSeries servers, delivering a Java application integrated with the current 1x2x features and functionalities (1x2x is IBM’s award winning corporate portal). In the trunk, the storage space is massive (DB2 v8.1 and its binary large object ‘BLOB’ support for large file attachments storage) and here you can easily fit much more than the standard 5 suitcases and a baby trolley! DB2 handles the need for scalability and Multilanguage support quite well (remember, IBM does business in 170 countries worldwide) and data is saved in UTF-8 (Unicode Transformation Format).

In the driver’s seat, IBM has teamed up with Endeca, delivering a powerful and integrated GPS and Navigation System (Endeca’s Information Access Platform [IAP]). Road Assist (Ask&Answer) is provided by Bazaarvoice who are also delivering a great Traffic Reporting System so other drivers can learn swiftly from the wisdom of others (Ratings and Reviews). And to make the passenger ride even smoother, Web Services providing APIs for enhanced user experience (i.e. Blinds; a form of personalized filtering) are available.

All in all, from a test driver’s seat, the Blue Business Platform looks very promising. It will be interesting to see how it performs on public roads later this summer, and I’ll try to get one of the lucky early owners their perspective. Until then, here are some screenshots of the application I managed to get:



Let us know what you think!

Christian C Carlsson
ibm.com site architecture


Categories : [   architecture  |  blue_business_platform  |  christian_carlsson  |  enterprise_2.0  |  infrastructure  |  rosa_bolger  |  web_2.0  ]

Jun 24 2008, 01:14:22 PM EDT Permalink



Friday June 06, 2008

Social web and the enterprise

Facebook, My Space, Twitter, Google FriendConnect, LinkedIn, Ning -- the list is long and continues to grow. All of this social activity on the web had advertisers and marketers excited, but as Eric Sylver says in his article, "Social networks continue to grow. But like a teenage crush, the excitement over the marketing possibilities in them has eased. And, as the social networking landscape diversifies, some of these companies are looking around for other ways to "monetize" their often sizable audiences." Does this mean that the social web is going to fade away? Should an enterprise like IBM bother with the social web?

I do not believe the social web is going away, but I do think the original "gated community" concept of trying to get as many people as possible onto your proprietary platform will not survive. (At least I hope we have learned a lesson from the way mobile phone networks evolved in the United States.) In recent weeks, Facebook, MySpace and Google have all made moves toward a more open social networking environment. I think this trend will make online social networking easier and more valuable for the enterprise.

One of the most valuable aspects of social networking coming to the web is that "word of mouth" opinions about your brand and products are now there for the asking/ searching. The more open and accessible this social networking data is, the easier it is for enterprises to mine and use. Additionally, this openness will make it easier for enterprises to join the conversation. Today, the prospect of going from Facebook, to My Space, to any number of Ning communities to the next "hottest" social network to engage your customers is daunting. With an open platform, enterprises can more easily find the conversations and participate. A company could even look at importing those conversations right onto their site -- you could show the posts from the Pacific Northwest IBM FileNet UserNet on Ning or the IBM Twitter feed or the IBM DB2 Group on Facebook or ... you get the picture. We have already seen the positive impact of exposing user input through online ratings and reviews.



I believe incorporating additional social capabilities into an enterprise site will further boost user engagement and the overall usefulness of a site. Rather than trying to constantly guess at the content people want on your site, why not open up some of your site and let users contribute the content they want.

There is, however, a word of caution here. As the gates to these communities open, even more people will be exposed to the activity within -- whether you choose to expose it on your site or not. If they are not already, every company needs to have a plan in place to monitor these conversations and respond accordingly in an honest and open manner. Acknowledge problems, take actions to correct and let people know that you are doing so. If it is simply misinformation, correct the record and thank people for taking the time to make their opinions known. The concepts aren't new, but the risks and rewards are now even greater. Now is the time for enterprises to know where their clients are and go engage them in an honest dialogue.


Garrett Hall
ibm.com Innovation and Strategy

Categories : [   Garrett_Hall  |  community  |  ibm.com  |  social_web  |  web_innnovation  ]

Jun 06 2008, 04:53:38 PM EDT Permalink




Friday May 16, 2008

Enterprise 2.0



I am – as many others – a keen communicator of the value web 2.0 has for the Enterprise. Some call this Enterprise 2.0 which, in short…

“… refers to the application of Web 2.0 applications and approaches inside organizations. In a broader sense, it describes the next phase of how organizations are creating value from the participation of their employees, customers, and suppliers.” (futureexploration.net, 2007)

And in today’s B2B world where Relationship Marketing and Sales is of greatest importance it becomes even more important to enable and integrate the discussion between us, our customers, our partners, and our suppliers. I still argue that the B2B environment is lagging behind the B2C environment in this regard (which there are reasons for) and I suppose many will agree. Nancy Davis Kho (eContent Magazine, 2008) recently wrote:

“The irony is that social media tools, properly designed and deployed, may actually bring a greater payoff to B2B users than in the B2C environment. The reason? Tools that enable faster and more personalized interactions between customer and vendor can enhance corporate credibility and deepen relationships. Those are all- important factors in B2B sales decisions, which tend to have a higher dollar value and longer-term impact than consumer sales.”

Her article is interesting reading and features some good examples on how to leverage the web for deeper customer engagement and uncovering new information. I recommend reading it if you also find this subject of interest.

We are, of course, working hard at IBM to be at the forefront of these changes in the B2B environment. Recently you might have seen communication of our new Blue Business Platform (for instance here and here) which is truly built up around an Enterprise 2.0 web philosophy, with online collaboration between customers, IBM partners and solution providers, and IBM. Frank Gens from IDC describes it this way:

“IBM is developing what may be characterized as an iTunes-like model for data centers that will enable a business to download the complete application stack, run it and even turn over server management to the vendor, which would run it remotely.”

It will be interesting to follow the development and launch of the Blue Business Platform. As soon as I get some screenshots or perhaps a working demo in our ibm.com/sandbox, I will share this with you, here. Until then – please share your thoughts or examples of Enterprise 2.0.


Christian C Carlsson
ibm.com Site Architecture team


Categories : [   B2B  |  BBP  |  blue_business_platform  |  christian_carlsson  |  enterprise_2.0  |  social_software  ]

May 16 2008, 05:44:07 AM EDT Permalink



Thursday May 08, 2008

Kristen Johansen’s, Creating Career Paths for UX Professionals

Get some useful ideas and tools for career planning

At the recent IA Summit 2008 I attended Kristen Johansen’s seminar, Creating Career Paths for UX Professionals. Although her presentation was geared toward managers, I attended in hopes of getting a sneak peak into what managers are looking for in an employee. If you are seeking advancement, this presentation could help you with career planning on many levels.

Kristen emphasized the importance of creating an exhaustive job description when looking for a new hire. Here she provides a Job description matrix (blank job description matrix) as a tool for managers for setting expectations. In turn, I think that this can be used as a personal tool for career planning. In her experience, competencies and scope of influence are most important in determining an employee’s position. Also, remember to translate generalities and traits into specifics and behaviors. In one case study the employee “annotated [the] job description for the next level up – “checking off” met requirements.” This could be a fabulous way to prove to your manager that you are ready for that promotion.

Be proactive by setting and tracking your own goals. Kristen said, “Tracking your goals will allow for introspection.” Have regular goal setting/check-ins with your manager and get it in writing if possible. Ensure that you and your manager agree on a clear path for advancement, including the requirements for each level of your role. Keep in mind that your manager is there to provide support and set objectives, not goals. I liked this analogy, “Objectives are the map.” She continued with the idea that managers are not there to give you the exact directions or back-seat-drive. You can find many more examples of ways that you can be proactive in her presentation.

Kristen included the questions below as a great starting point, which may be referred to on an ongoing basis.

Create SMART Goals:
  • Specific (Do my manager and I both clearly understand what the goal is?)
  • Measurable (How will my manager and I know if I was successful?)
  • Actionable (How will I do it?)
  • Realistic (Will I realistically be able to do it?)
  • Time-bound (When will I do it?)

Ask yourself these six important questions:
1. Do I know what is expected of me at work?
2. Do I have the materials I need to do my work right?
3. At work, do I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day?
4. In the last seven days, have I received recognition or praise for doing good work?
5. Does my supervisor, or someone at work, seem to care about me as a person?
6. Is there someone at work who encourages my development?
Source: First, Break All the Rules, Marcus Buckingham & Curt Coffman, 1999
(Note, there is a more extensive list in First, Break All the Rules)

Books that Kristen recommends:

  • First, Break All the Rules: What the World’s Greatest Managers Do Differently - Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman
  • 12: The Elements of Great Managing – Rodd Wagner and James Harter

I highly recommend taking a look at Creating Career Paths for UX Professionals!

Kimberly S. Knight
Art Director, User Experience Design, ibm.com



Categories : [   Kimberly_Knight  |  Kristen_Johansen  |  UX  |  career  |  ibm.com  |  management  |  planning  ]

May 08 2008, 10:22:38 AM EDT Permalink



Monday May 05, 2008

Mobile is coming, mobile is coming, mobile is coming...

Without much tangible evidence to support it, I have been hearing and parroting this for a few years now. I was not one who predicted annually, "okay, this is really the year when it finally takes off", but I would tell those willing to indulge me (or at least not cut me off) that mobile will have a profound change on how we work, play and interact. It is immediate, it carries location information, and it is always with you. Maybe I just want to believe it, but some recent headlines and announcements have me thinking mobile's day as part of the global mainstream is finally dawning. Just a few of them are:

Looking at these headlines in aggregate -- and in light of the fact that iPhones are so user friendly and people are generally comfortable texting on their phone -- tells me that functionality everyone can relate to and use is finally arriving. Most, if not all, can relate to seeing the price of an item on a store's shelf and wondering if it's cheaper on Amazon, or wanting to read some news while waiting for that habitually late friend to show up, or checking to see if your latest paycheck has been deposited.

What does this mean for enterprises like IBM who sell primarily to other businesses? From a research and product offering standpoint, IBM sees the promise of mobile -- see IBM Launches Mobile Web Initiative to Transform Consumer and Business Experiences . What is less clear to me, is exactly what mobile resources individuals will look for to support their "relationship" with an enterprise like IBM. At ibm.com, we have seen considerable interest in a wireless portal we deployed for business partners in Japan, and we can readily see some extensions to that. For individuals working at our clients, some of the desired mobile capabilities that come to mind are order status, issue resolution status, event information, special offers and quick access to sales and support personnel.

What else would you like to see? What mobile features and functions should IBM and others who sell primarily to other businesses offer?


Garrett Hall
ibm.com Innovation and Strategy

Categories : [   Garrett_Hall  |  ibm.com  |  mobile  |  web_innovation  ]

May 05 2008, 03:19:51 PM EDT Permalink




Tuesday April 15, 2008

IBM.com is a Webby Award Nominee!


ibm.com has been nominated as a top website for the 2008 Webby Awards. IBM's website is one of five finalists in the IT Hardware/Software division of the "Marketplace" category.

The Webby's are prestigious awards that symbolize success in web design, user experience, and interactivity; they have been the leading international award for the web since 1996. The 12th annual Webby Awards ceremony will be held at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City on June 10, 2008.

YOU are the People's Voice...
There are two Webby awards in each category -- one that the a panel of judges bestows and one where the public decides the winner. Public voting for the nominees takes place via the People's Voice Awards through May 1st (http://peoplesvoice.webbyawards.com/). You can help select winners in the Markeplace category via People's Voice voting, as well as being able to vote for all the other categories. The voting tool is a great way to see what is leading in the web for other industries.

New 1x2x Design
A new ibm.com design was introduced last June to move the site from a static experience to one that is dynamic and adaptive. The innovative design was validated with worldwide user testing and expert evaluation by user engineering professionals. Since its launch, it has been praised by industry analysts and has also driven increased traffic, reaching approximately 300 million visitors annually. IBM is also providing thought leadership through the further integration of personalization on the site with the addition of the "My IBM" feature. This new dynamic home page serves up a customized experience based on intelligent user detection. Roll-overs and dropdown menus are also an innovative addition to the IBM website. The ibm.com team was involved from the first steps of conception of this re-design to production, execution, implementation, and feedback. The entire ibm.com team is credited with this nomination, making ibm.com one of the leading competitors in the IT industry today.

Want a glimpse into our future....?
Our next plans involve driving emerging technology on the ibm.com in the area of communities and collaboration. Currently we have several projects under way to experiment, utilize, and create communities that users can build and network through. The ultimate goal is to have an underlying platform that encourages collaboration, the sharing of ideas, and the surfacing of relationships, while creating a participatory environment in which people find the right information and the right resources. Stay tuned to our blog for more information on this topic!

Don't forget to vote for ibm.com in the Webby awards - online voting is open until May 1st and feel free to spread the word!

Christina Hu
ibm.com User Experience Design Team

Categories : [   1x2x  |  awards  |  christina_hu  |  design  |  nominee  |  v16  |  webby  ]

Apr 15 2008, 02:15:43 AM EDT Permalink



Wednesday April 09, 2008

Research study on ratings and reviews for the business user



We have all used it – ratings or reviews by other consumers – written about a product or service we are interested in purchasing. Amazon has had this functionality available for years, and most online consumer stores have it. Now business-to-business focused companies (such as IBM) are also looking at how rating and reviews can help in for instance building trust and loyalty with customers.

But is it so easy to just move a "consumer success" over to the enterprise world? That was my first question I asked when I started making research study on ratings and reviews for the business user. Other questions that I find interesting are:

- Are the benefits the same for more complex products or solutions?
- Could reviews take over some of the value that customer testimonials or reference stories traditionally provided?
- Does the presence or absence of a ratings and reviews capability affect the buying behavior of our customers?
- What are the perceived benefits and barriers for business users in relation to ratings and reviews?

I have set out to try to answer this set of questions and more. If you are interested in this area and would like to participate in the research, please take the survey. It takes only 10-15 minutes and your input is much appreciated. As an added bonus, you can also sign-up to get the report findings sent to you when this is available.

Link to survey

Christian C Carlsson
ibm.com Site Architecture team


Categories : [   buying_behavior  |  christian_carlsson  |  ibm.com  |  ratings_reviews  |  ratings_survey  |  reviews_survey  ]

Apr 09 2008, 07:37:19 AM EDT Permalink



Wednesday April 02, 2008

Why is IM different than e-Mail?

Digital convergence is hitting the living room. It needs to hit basic communications tools too.

The distinction between instant messaging, e-mail and discussion forums is increasingly artificial:
  • Why aren’t my chats with someone simply stored in my e-mail history?
  • Why can’t I open a chat window with somebody who isn’t on-line and have my message just appear in their in-basket?
  • If I’m looking at an e-mail from someone, why can’t my reply appear in front of them as a chat window?
  • Why do I get replies to my forum posts as e-mail but I usually have to visit the forum in my browser in order to reply?
  • Why can’t a complete discussion thread be accessible in my e-mail client?
  • Why can’t a long e-mail thread be viewable, and with the same display options, as if it were a discussion thread?
  • Why must each email in a long thread repeat in its body all the previous messages in the thread?
  • Why isn’t editing, formatting, inserting graphics, spell-checking, selecting text or navigating around the body of a message absolutely identical whether typing a message or an e-mail or a forum post?
Clearly, there is huge and growing overlap on these three paradigms, but the overlap is so imperfectly managed that it’s turning into a serious productivity bottleneck as their usage becomes ubiquitous. And the immediate future poses additional common sense questions:
  • Why can I record voice and video chats but I can’t create a simple voice e-mail…simply?
  • Why isn’t all voice mail (land and mobile) delivered via email?
  • Why can’t I use my computer to email a voice message to someone?
Then look a bit farther and even more questions appear:
  • Why aren’t business telephone conferences automatically recorded and instantly made available as podcasts that can be replayed, emailed, chatted and discussed?
  • Why can’t Web conferences?
So with all these seemingly obvious questions, are they about to merge? Will Apple be the only company who can accomplish this?

What do you think?

Jeff Schaffer
ibm.com site architecture

Categories : [   IM  |  e_mail  |  ibm.com  |  jeff_schaffer  ]

Apr 02 2008, 10:38:51 AM EDT Permalink



Tuesday March 25, 2008

Has Agile software Development really "hit the wall"?

Hello, everyone, my name is Matt Ganis. I’m with the ibm.com site architecture team and a heavy proponent of Agile Development methods. For those that aren’t familiar with Agile methods, it’s a development methodology that stresses rapid iterations, small and frequent releases, and evolving requirements facilitated by direct user involvement in the development process. These methodologies include Extreme Programming (XP), Scrum, RUP and DSDM (to name a few).

There have been many studies looking at the adoption of these techniques by various development teams, and many surveys that look at who has adopted. Scott Ambler (a fellow IBM’er and friend of mine) conducts such a survey in Doctor Dobb’s Journal. Scott recently spoke at the SD West conference in Santa Clara, California about some of the results of his recent survey, and he postulates that the adoption of Agile among development teams has “hit the wall” – implying that fewer teams are adopting these methods and more specifically that agile adoption “has peaked."

Now, I’ve been teaching Agile classes lately to some of our teams in Poughkeepsie (the large Operating system, hardware, and firmware teams) and it got me thinking about Scott’s statements:

I wonder if Agile hasn’t so much “hit the wall” but that it’s been adopted by all those teams that could easily adopt the methods (about 70% of the survey respondents), however, now it’s time to work on the other 30% (the last mile, if you will) that have some serious issues in adopting these methods. So it’s not that they can’t (or don’t want to adopt) – it’s more that they don’t know how to adopt given their environment.

Working with the large operating systems guys, it’s clear that the traditional Agile approaches won’t work (well) for them. Given the complexity of these systems making small changes in two week iterations can be difficult (if not impossible) for these teams. I know what you’re thinking: “just do longer iterations” – or the shortest iteration they can. But when you listen to other practioners, they claim you’re not Agile if your iterations are too long. However, for these types of groups, maybe it doesn’t mean that they can’t be Agile, it just means they can’t conform to the traditional definition of Agile. For these teams, working in increments of 6 weeks would be considered Agile (as opposed to a traditional 2 week iteration) – after all, 6 week iterations would be far better than 6 month or 1 year “waterfall” releases. So I wonder if the 70% referenced by Ambler is the “easy” part, and the final 30% is the “tougher nut to crack”.

So why do you all think these 30% aren’t adopting agile? A few things come to my mind:

  • They have a large number of dependencies on external teams (or processes)
  • The systems are highly complex (like an Operating system)
  • There is a large amount of Legacy code
  • Some of these systems just aren’t built to change often.
None of these reasons should prevent a team from adopting an Agile development methodology, but I would think it would make them very cautious in their approach.

But I’m curious what you all think: how can we help get that last 30% “over the hump”?

Categories : [   Agile  |  ibm_com  |  matt_ganis  |  software_development  ]

Mar 25 2008, 11:15:00 AM EDT Permalink




Thursday March 20, 2008

Test environments on the enterprise web

I was reading an interview the other week with Andreas Weigend explaining the evolution from e-business to me-business and, now, we-business. Andreas seems to have a lot of experience in this subject, on how customers make decisions using information and how corporations should position themselves strategically.

He used a simple pyramid to explain his thinking, and even though the term “we-business” risks becoming a well hyped word, there is no doubt that collaboration and integration will increasingly drive a change in how business and organizations communicate with their customers – and vice versa.



Andreas’ thoughts on e-business are that people should discover products and services together, through a community where they are connected by conversations. But before companies can get to that Community level in their relationship with the customer, there are fundamental levels that need to be explored and used. This puts a lot of constraints on the enterprise. Not only does it take time and a lot of resource to change large, complex web structures such as ibm.com, it also requires major changes in culture, behavior and leadership. I believe we all recognize that many enterprises talk a lot about the Participation stage, but do we see enough real action? While it has never been easier to test how the customers react and behave in their engagement with a business, this opportunity is still used at very limited level and, at least in the B2B environment, experimentation and testing is limited (Andreas’ ‘Experiment stage’). Companies selling to consumer seem to be much better at this.

Experimenting widely across an entire enterprise portal is not the best solution due to several reasons like stability, business impact, and stakeholder and sponsor involvement. This is why a more controlled, yet open environment is needed. Many traditional online companies already do this, for example, eBay’s Sneak Peek and Playground, and YouTube’s TestTube, to mention some. The common objectives for these “playgrounds” as stated by the companies are constant testing, testing, testing, and change, change, change!

However, the use of these types of testing environments does not have to be limited to companies who came into being since the advent of the web. At IBM, we have recently launched our own testing site called ibm.com Sandbox. Our objective is to create a collaborative environment for testing of new designs, functions, features, applications and emerging web technologies. Hands-on experimentation with hands-on results will also help us drive internal change in our own web culture, creating a better visitor experience. There are nothing like hard facts to convince others!



The Sandbox is still in its early days with new features being developed for testing as I write. But we are already using this environment to collect both qualitative and quantitative feedback which is then used when making decisions on developing or deploying new functions or designs on the IBM web site.

Working on the Sandbox project, I would be interested in hearing and learning from others on this topic. After all, IBM is not facing the challenges of keeping up with the fast changing world of e-business alone. So, let’s follow Andreas Weigends lead and make that we-business instead!



Christian C Carlsson
ibm.com Site Architecture team



Categories : [   beta_testing  |  christian_carlsson  |  ibm.com  |  sandbox  |  testing_environment  |  web_experimentation  ]

Mar 20 2008, 05:09:20 PM EDT Permalink



Tuesday March 18, 2008

Why do avatars sit? An IA looks at Second Life

As an information architect and general introspective type I tend to look at life and cyberspace in terms of questions. Today I’m pondering “Why do avatars sit?” I wonder, how can they be tired? Is it a social construct? Is it just a habit? Or is it just the need for the duplication of the real life current position? But when I found myself beginning to explore Second Life (http://www.secondlife.com), my thoughts began to coalesce around three fundamental IA questions and their evolving solutions.

Where am I? On websites the company logo is prominently in a corner or at the top of the page. In Second Life, how do I know where I am in greater detail than the map? I need repetitive signs or common design elements, interior design that matches the corporate identity, and consistent landscaping to signal my current location.

What can I do here? Unlike the web where click-and-watch or click-and-listen are the only choices, I can interact with elements and create things in the Second Life. I need standard visual indicators for which items hold interaction capabilities.

Where can I go next? Teleporters, sometimes clickable images that transport me, could offer a preview to see where I’m going before I get there. Some type of virtual navigation controls or options might be a way a user can see “what else” there is to see in the world at all times.

A strong information architecture puts us closer to developing an optimal 3D internet user experience. A great user experience can help us continue to support, educate and participate in collaborative relationships with our customers and partners in the virtual world. I’m excited to be working in an evolving world; I think I’ll pull up a chair.

Ginger Poole
Information Architect, User Experience, ibm.com
Client experience lead, Virtual Business Center, ibm.com

Categories : [   ginger_poole  |  ibm.com  |  information_architecture  |  second_life  ]

Mar 18 2008, 01:12:00 AM EDT Permalink



Monday March 17, 2008

Welcome to the ibm.com web innovation blog!

Hello and welcome!

So, who are we? We are a group of technical folks, with some business skills mixed in. We are spread across the globe, but happen to belong to the same organization inside IBM. Our job titles may be "information architect", "web developer", "site architect", or "user experience designer" but it all boils down to one thing: every day, we try to think of new and innovative ways to improve the visitor experience on the ibm.com web site. Today, we're introducing this blog as one way to do precisely that.

The topics in this blog might range from "Is Open ID as good as it gets?" to "How to use Ajax to improve site performance" and we welcome your input on all of them. Some posts might be technical, others philosophical. Some will be long, some short (hey, we could go Seussical with this :). Sometimes we will be specifically looking to get feedback from you on particular ideas and sometimes we will just be "thinking out loud" or sharing some stuff we have done that we think is pretty cool. Some of us already blog and, for some of us, this is a brand new experience. But we do promise one thing: we'll read what you write, if you read what we write!

Looking forward to the adventure! Tune in tomorrow for our first entry: ""Why do avatars sit in Second Life?".

Monica Piccinini
ibm.com site architecture manager, former programmer, current blogger

Categories : [   ibm.com  |  intro  |  monica_piccinini  |  web_innovation  ]

Mar 17 2008, 11:57:06 AM EDT Permalink

Previous month
  June 2009
Next month
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    
       
Today

RSS for

RSS for

Favorites

Categories
1x2x (1)
Agile (1)
B2B (1)
BBP (1)
Garrett Hall (2)
IM (1)
Kimberly Knight (1)
Kristen Johansen (1)
UX (1)
architecture (1)
awards (1)
beta testing (1)
blue business platform (2)
buying behavior (2)
career (1)
christian carlsson (5)
christina hu (1)
community (1)
design (1)
e mail (1)
enterprise 2.0 (2)
ginger poole (1)
guidelines (1)
ibm (1)
ibm.com (10)
ibm com (1)
information architecture (1)
infrastructure (1)
intro (1)
jeff schaffer (1)
management (1)
matt ganis (1)
mobile (1)
monica piccinini (1)
nominee (1)
planning (1)
ratings reviews (2)
ratings survey (2)
research results (1)
reviews survey (2)
rosa bolger (1)
sandbox (1)
sarah goldman (1)
second life (1)
social software (1)
social web (1)
software development (1)
tagging (1)
testing environment (1)
v16 (1)
web 2.0 (1)
web experimentation (1)
web innnovation (1)
web innovation (2)
webby (1)

Recent Entries
Ratings and reviews for business...
Under the hood of IBM’s next Web...
Social web and the enterprise
Enterprise 2.0
Kristen Johansen’s, Creating Car...
Mobile is coming, mobile is comi...
IBM.com is a Webby Award Nominee...
Research study on ratings and re...
Why is IM different than e-Mail?
Has Agile software Development r...
Test environments on the enterpr...
Why do avatars sit? An IA looks ...
Welcome to the ibm.com web innov...

Blogs I read

Special offers
Cloud Computing: IBM and Amazon Web Services
Hey there! developerWorks is using Twitter
Get recognized!
dW Author 
Program

More offers


 
    About IBM Privacy Contact